The physical button is alot of wasted space.
The physical button is one of the best design features in iOS products and the lack thereof one of the most annoying things about Android devices. Ergonomics matter.
The physical button is alot of wasted space.
Thanks for being a faithful reader
Ford: "We've decided to do away with the brake pedal on all future cars, instead, replacing it with a touch sensitive glass pad which is integrated into the foot well"
Yeah? no. These people clearly do not know Apple very well AT ALL.
The physical button is one of the best design features in iOS products and the lack thereof one of the most annoying things about Android devices. Ergonomics matter.
Single function device - it's a remote.Normally I would agree. But given the decline of good design at Apple (see Siri remote) it wouldn't shock me to see this happen.
Directional force detection, remember the "nub" on IBM laptops? Think that in the home button. Great for cursor control, even better for an analog joystick for games.Isn't TouchID already touch sensitive? Reachability? Apple Pay?
Isn't TouchID already touch sensitive? Reachability? Apple Pay?
For a huge, cash-rich company, Apple seems to be doing very little in terms of innovation, design, and maximising the potential and delivery of its products, or it is doing a heck of a lot behind the scenes.
Has Apple become a lazy, rudderless, commonplace producer of lamely fashionable tat, or is it going to surprise us with a move that will let it and technology take a giant leap forwards?
All this parsimonious mediocrity is so underwhelming.
For what earthly reason?
VERY few people understand simple design which is carefully considered and made to feel comfortable, and people asking Apple to align it's design philosopy with the "current trend" in Android devices... wow, that is laughable. I can put my hand in my pocket, hold down the home button and say "Set timer, 5 minutes" - my fingers know that dimple, so simple!
[doublepost=1461594848][/doublepost]
Single function device - it's a remote.
I hope thats not all the innovation that Apple could have come up with, otherwise I will hold off to replace my iphone 6.
Lets sum up all the rumors:
- Thinner (not for me, I am happy with the current thickness and prefer a bigger battery)
- Waterproofing (wow, what an innovation, most android flagship phones have this already for years)
- headphone jack removal (please no!)
- some changes to the homebutton (IMO, get rid of it completely and integrate touch-id in the display = innovation)
- Updated design (depending on how it will look, I don't care too much since my phone is in a case anyway)
- Spec bump & camera improvements (as usual)
I really hope for Apple that there will be more then this...
True. But the problem there is that a car will take them into niche territory: fewer people can afford to buy cars, the buyers tend to be older, and the market is heavily fragmented.They're making a car, dude. Chill.
Increasingly finding that people are falling out of love with Apple: messy product lines, glib designs and accessories, and underwhelming miserly products. No longer cutting edge and desirable, but achingly dull and fashionably risible.
*respected and great analystThis news is irrelevant unless corroborated by the great analyst Ming Chi-Kuo. Then, and only then, will I believe it.
Stale. It's also rather difficult to draw a comparison to something that is replaced as often as a phone. Or something in the fast past tech world vs. a mature product like a car. Or something that cost $600 vs. $60,000.Stale and predictable... or iconic? There's a reason that car manufacturers have kept the same grille design for decades. Can you imagine a BMW without the kidneys?