Wow - 16 km a day is impressive! But have you tried running with Bluetooth Headphones? I use the Beats sports ones - they are the only ones that I found to be comfortable, sweat resistant and to actually stay in my ears; and it's liberating to have no cable...
Yes, and with an adapter, you'll be able to plug your headphone into any device; lightning and 3.5.
Oh really? iPhone and good quality is an oxymoron
I could agree more. I also owned every iPhone since 5s (except 6), but time has come to say goodbye and move to far superior Android. It was a nice ride.
You'll be back in Sep 2017
Thank you.
The only problem with Bluetooth headphones - at least for me - is that I do not get the same sound quality as I'd get from wired ones. I briefly used Jaybirds, but always keep on coming back to my good old Bose SoundSport (wired). Maybe its in my head, but I can't help noticing that, albeit minor, difference in the sound quality.
You remind me of my kids when they were younger and thought "I know you are, but what am I" was a good comeback.
Sorry when I have to get a device replaced under apple care I want a new one not a refurbished one.? And I've seen people have to replace their phones multiple times. Quality control is down.You remind me of my kids when they were younger and thought "I know you are, but what am I" was a good comeback.
I doubt I am in the minority, for a few reasons:
First, the majority of the population (at least in the US) lives in cities. In cities, I see people walking or on public transit with headphones everywhere. Even in cities that don't have great public transport, people walk with headphones. I bet that the total number of people-hours spent walking or in public transit with headphones is far greater than the total number of people hours spent listening to bluetooth or in cars.
Second, even though I use my camera daily, I never use it for more than like 3 seconds, 5 seconds tops. Anything longer turns into creepy. However, even listening to one or two song per day already means I use headphones 100x longer.
Anything that is meant for society to consume is better than Ghostbusters.at least this is gonna be better than Ghostbusters
Yep it will still sell more than any other phone
You're forgetting that Apple has a very rich and very engrossing ecosystem. You can't just simply jump ship for an Android device as easily as you make it out to be.The nice thing is we're talking about consumer electronics. Not a religion or marriage.
If you have loyalty to any company you buy toys from you're a fool. If the 2016 iPhone is a dud, buy an android. It doesn't make you a lifelong member of the android religion. If the 2017 iPhone is better, buy one in 2017.
Owning a cell phone does not make you a member of an exclusive cult.
I have owned iPhones since 2008. I have only had to replace one and that was due to a very small crack it received when I dropped it on concrete.Sorry when I have to get a device replaced under apple care I want a new one not a refurbished one.? And I've seen people have to replace their phones multiple times. Quality control is down.
Galaxy s7 and s7 edge outsold iPhone 6s and 6s+ in the US.
Looking at next month's iPhone rumors and the galaxy s8 rumors (4k AMOLED screen for starters), the next generation will be even more in the Galaxy's favor.
You're kidding, right? Serial ports, parallel ports, and floppy disk drives had 100% market share when Apple got rid of them. And describing USB as "a replacement ready to go" is hardly accurate - there were very few USB accessories available at the time. There was a bit of a gold rush as every peripheral/accessory manufacturer scrambled to fill the void.Serial ports, floppy disks, cd-roms, etc, none of these had 80%+ market share at the time Apple got rid of them, all of them had a serious limitation, and there was a replacement ready to go and affordable at that time. None of those factors is true here.
Galaxy s7 and s7 edge outsold iPhone 6s and 6s+ in the US.
Looking at next month's iPhone rumors and the galaxy s8 rumors (4k AMOLED screen for starters), the next generation will be even more in the Galaxy's favor.
How is using a camera for more than 5 seconds creepy? You are a very strange fellow.
Yes. Still ultimately worth it.First, it's not single purpose. It's used for right channel, left channel, mic, play, pause, volume up, volume down, answer call, hang up call, next track, previous track, etc. Some accessories use it for an IR blaster. Some podcast makers plug high quality mics into it to record interviews. Credit card swippers use it.
Second, what about it is "legacy" exactly? According to this article recently, 3.5mm headphones still represent 83% of unit sales last month. That means 83% of people who bought new headphones in June will be disappointed by Apple's move. And probably more from every month before that. That is a large pool of potential buyers that Apple would be alienating.
Third, in total, the bluetooth or lightning headphones plus an iphone will probably weigh more than 3.5mm headphones plus an iphone. Extra battery, extra circuitry, extra amp, etc. Lots of redundant components in the supposedly "improved" system. In sum it will weigh more, so lightness is not true.
Fourth, no one wants more thinness.
Fifth, we'll see what "improved features" Apple proposes, but I expect it will be mostly marketing fluffery. In terms of audio, there is nothing Apple can show that isn't already being done with 3.5mm headphones as well.
Didn't the 6s come out like a year ago, though? Not really a fair comparison.
Please provide a source for this. And don't link to that Kantar study that provided percentages without giving any actual numbers. If they can't give numbers then they're just making stuff up (probably by taking a survey and extrapolating from that).
I think you may be overestimating your need for a headphone jack. Apple will either include lighting EarPods or an adapter with traditional EarPods.
Either way, you're not losing the ability to plug in headphones at the expense of a better camera.
I could agree more. I also owned every iPhone since 5s (except 6), but time has come to say goodbye and move to far superior Android. It was a nice ride.
So... You didn't read the comment I referred to, because I already explained why I'm less than enthusiastic about paying $1000 for a device and it being less convenient than what I'm using now (even if the adapter is free, which it might not be). Would it be cool if I needed an extra peripheral to make a phone call or use a text?
I know it's not a huge deal, but I want my new devices to be more usable and convenient than my current ones, not less.