For €1.129 for the top-of-line model, I'm a bit disappointed that it does not have the unique feature of exploding at will, like the Galaxy Note 7. I mean, isn't that the ultimate data security feature that we all want?
That will make a great tagline for Samsung's next print ad!The Galaxy S7 edge is only 10 seconds slower than the iPhone 6S Plus
Profits. Apple can license out Lightning, but they can't do that with USB-C.
Yes,That will make a great tagline for Samsung's next print ad!
The first one is free. It comes in the box with the iPhone. There's no kitten in the box, so if you want a free kitten, you'll have to look elsewhere. Apple apparently doesn't believe in free kittens, but they will give you a free adapter.
[doublepost=1473307644][/doublepost]
Simple. Charge your phone in the daytime. That leaves the night free for listening to music with your lightning headphones.
What would be the point of that? They could get the same for cheaper, by using USB-C.I know that Apple has licensed Lightning to various 3rd-party manufacturers that make adapters and Lightning-compatible products for iPhone. But curious, has Apple licensed (or plans to license) Lightning to handset manufacturers like Samsung and LG to specifically allow those companies to use Lightning ports on their smartphones?
Wired connection will be 0 latency. W1 will compensate for wireless lag where it can (videos already compensate for BT lag, but that's of course impossible with games).Does anybody know what the latency is using the lightning headphone verses the analog port?
I know Bluetooth has this problem. I hate playing games or watching videos and the sound is just slightly out of sync with what is going on in the screen.
Here we go : http://www.apple.com/iphone-7/specs/Has anyone else noted the twin speaker grills on the bottom? Remember the rumours Apple were going to replace the headphone jack with fake speaker holes.... Let's see what ifixit finds behind those grills... If it's nothing then Apple really has reached an all time new low.
They damn well better have put a speaker behind one and microphone behind the other!
Right, I was thinking the same thing. I was waiting for Phil to say that the audio coming out of the new dongle was even better quality and sampling rate than the old analog port helping to sell the idea of the new lightning headset.Sorry if this has been discussed already, just trying to catch up. Can anyone please point me to any reviews of the sound quality via airpods and particularly via lightning/3.5 jack adapter? I'm desperately hoping it's not apple against the music. ...
Why would you sell a feature that literally no one can detect in a double blind test?Right, I was thinking the same thing. I was waiting for Phil to say that the audio coming out of the new dongle was even better quality and sampling rate than the old analog port helping to sell the idea of the new lightning headset.
If you would understand anything about audio, you wouldn't make such comments.
1. There is no digital audio. At some point you have to go analog. If it happens inside the phone or inside the headphones doesn't matter as long as we are looking the same DAC.
2. Apple and Beats headphones are pretty average and not worth their price.
3. Wireless means losing quality.
New chip + improved camera + same form factor = S upgrades.
Apple should have called it the iPhone 6SS.
Or the iPhone 7 ZZZ.
That will make a great tagline for Samsung's next print ad!
Sorry if this has been discussed already, just trying to catch up. Can anyone please point me to any reviews of the sound quality via airpods and particularly via lightning/3.5 jack adapter? I'm desperately hoping it's not apple against the music. ...
No, people expected the price to be higher because Apple will be Apple. I'm not complaining about the price of the adapter. I'm shocked because the price is decidedly un-Apple like.So people are complaining that Apple didn't set the price higher, like, because that challenges your expectations? Would it have been preferable if the adapter was set at $£30 so we could shoot Apple down for ripping us all off?
Damned if they do. Damned if they don't.
Only the black version. The piano black version is too glossy and will be spotted easily by aerial surveillance.iPhone 7 ISIS edition?
Since Apple is positioning the AirPods as the "introductory product" to the new wireless (jackless) world of audio…. they really should have priced it more reasonably in order to lure enough "adopters".
I understand that the engineering, the W1 chip, is not cheap, but I'm sure they still could have shipped this AirPods (at some small profit) for around $119 or $129. But at a price point of $159….. it will take years for the masses to be "sold" on the wireless audio thing.
Why not USB-C? Why the disconnect between macbook and iOS products? Can't seamlessly switch headphones or chargers between their own products. Sigh!
Wow, I would never have surmised that the price is what it is - thanks for pointing that out.The price is what it is, given it is more computer than many people have already, or for some people it is their only computer. And for those that use an installment payment plan, it is a brilliant way of getting the latest and greatest and only paying it off if they absolutely want to keep the iPhone and not upgrade.
Yeah, that's something I hadn't thought of before; good catch!Why not USB-C? Why the disconnect between macbook and iOS products? Can't seamlessly switch headphones or chargers between their own products. Sigh!