The cost is the least of my concern when it comes to having a phone that's way too big.Save your time and money for the bigger model, it's cheaper than rioting.
The cost is the least of my concern when it comes to having a phone that's way too big.Save your time and money for the bigger model, it's cheaper than rioting.
Ahhhm...dual camera phones has already been made by androids manufacturers for over a year now. LG G5 gas been rumoured well before the iPhone 7 to have dual cameras.and now we sit and wait for the top android phone manufacturers to rush and release a dual cam phone within the next 2-3 months...
If this does turn out to be true and is limited to the plus model only.
Is anyone willing to riot with me ?
Save your time and money for the bigger model, it's cheaper than rioting.
If this does turn out to be true and is limited to the plus model only.
Is anyone willing to riot with me ?
Samsung camera has been protruding since the s3. You know that right? Smh.Didn't stop Samsung from copying Apple on the lens protrusion. Cracked me up...
Quit ****in crying. All of you.Yes! ...I'm already pissed about the cam...the Plus is not a phone, too damn big...I want the best cam in the 4.7" iPhone!!!
I'm confused. What exact benefit do the dual lenses offer? How do they provide optical zoom?
I said the same thing and after about 3-4 months, the 6 plus felt small in my hands...
No Macs or iPads in my post. iPhones until 5c were "unapologetically" top dogs without any doubt. Now you have to choose size or portability or best camera or lowest price. You remember me Phill Schiller explaining how the new iPod without light sensor was obviously better than the previous one. Never believed him.Not all of them can deliver the best technology available. That's why there are two models of iPhone, several for Macs/iPad.
Or are you saying that a Mac Mini and a Mac Pro should be identical?
I hope Apple doesn't go Larger = Better way, I'd hate to miss out this tech just 'cause I don't want a large sized phone.
As a consumer I agree. But from a corporate perspective all companies must have multiple differentiators between models to "encourage" customers to rationalize buying a more expensive model than planned. Hard for Apple to justify the extra $100 price tag of the plus for just a larger screen. At best that alone is a $50 bump. There has to be additional features or you get a lot of customers asking themselves if they want to buy it. It also forces some customers to buy up if they want a feature in the higher model that are conveniently excluded from the down model. Every company's strategy is to get the customer to a more expensive product or service package. That's how they grow revenue, especially when their biggest products are mature.
[doublepost=1453906427][/doublepost]
Yes.![]()
It sounds like some people want Apple to artificially keep possible features OUT of the larger iPhone if they cannot back port them to the smaller ones. Those are the people I cannot understand. The smaller phone is the same either way, why do they want the larger phone to be worse?
I think we need to change the name of the forum to "Apple Complaints" from "Mac Rumors".
Ugh. No... nobody wants vr in its current state. Too bulky
Great. Glad it worked out for you. I carried a 6 for a year, and I've had a 6S since September. I still hate the size, and wish it was smaller.
And the stupid side power button drives me insane.
Apple will not further break up the Plus line. Just not happening. Small, medium, large. That's it. Keep hardware as close as possible, but because of sheer room, the plus will have a few extra perks. Just how physics works. Dual lenses will be sweet, the tech from Linx can simulate a DSLR that costs thousands... it's actually good IP that only Apple has now