Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
I don't mean you specifically but your response made me laugh. I remember when rumours started. People were demanding that Apple better give them an adapter or they're done. Now we want a full other set of headphones too. Just made me realise that no matter what they do, they're damned.

Think of it this way, apple launches the Lightning port, ships a 30pin cable , with an adapter.....or do you just package the Lightning port cable as they did
 
For all the people opining that this doesn't make sense...actually it makes perfect sense. Apple probably needs to get rid of tons of headphones. Secondly they need a way of getting adapters into peoples hands and look effortless doing it. There are plenty of people with expensive headphones that will need an adapter and be furious at the thought of having to buy one if a lightning headphone cord was included they'd be less angry. Third, they introduce wireless and/or improved lightning adapter headphones later to drive sales a few months after the phone is introduced.

Makes more sense to me to do it that way than include the lightning headphones when the phone is introduced.
 
If Apple includes an adapter it is an admission they made a mistake by removing it.

...except they've still removed a major weak spot from the design, replacing a half-inch crowbar sticking into the guts of the phone with a much smaller lightning connector designed from scratch to support the weight of the phone by spreading the force over a relatively large area of metal.

Now when your 3.5" jack goes all crackly you just buy a new adapter instead of sending your phone in for repair.

One question is whether the adapter actually is a D-to-A converter, of if they're simply using Lightning's "smart" feature to output analog audio when it detects an analog device - which would be the smart thing to do if you wanted to offer a cheap Lightning-to-3.5" adapter. The phone already has D-to-A to drive its speakers. In that case, the adapter could be really small.
 
Yay! Two stereo speakers at the bottom of the phone where it makes absolutely zero sense...
 
I do not want a lightning jack to be my headphone or earphone port. Furthermore, i have too many devices with 3.5 mm headphone jacks. Does apple want us to disenfranchise our other devices and please dont take the 3.5 mm headphone jack away from the future ipads either? Also, a separate adapter is just too much inconvenience and dangling when the 3.5 mm jack is the all-in-one solution...
 
For all the people opining that this doesn't make sense...actually it makes perfect sense. Apple probably needs to get rid of tons of headphones. Secondly they need a way of getting adapters into peoples hands and look effortless doing it. There are plenty of people with expensive headphones that will need an adapter and be furious at the thought of having to buy one if a lightning headphone cord was included they'd be less angry. Third, they introduce wireless and/or improved lightning adapter headphones later to drive sales a few months after the phone is introduced.

Makes more sense to me to do it that way than include the lightning headphones when the phone is introduced.

I'd make more sense to ship bluetooth EarPods.
I understand they have tons of old EarPods in stocks, but they'll continue to sell iPhone SE and 6s for a while so they could place their old EarPods with those products.
Apple likes to sell expensive adapters, they make tons of money that way
 
Doesn't apple give us macOS, iOS, watchOS, tvOS, Pages, Keynote, Numbers, iMovie, and Garage Band for free?

Yep they are just giving you all that stuff for free. I can't think of any other manufacture that gives "Free" upgrades to their software. Also I don't really consider Pages, Keynote, and Numbers to be usable.
 
This is not going to happen, this would be like changing to the Lightning port but still shipping with the 30-pin cable with an adapter.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Beerstalker
This is not going to happen, this would be like changing to the Lightning port but still shipping with the 30-pin cable with an adapter.
The difference was the 30-pin connector was exclusive to Apple 3.5mm is a standard everywhere else so it would make some sense to maintain compatibility.
 
  • Like
Reactions: AsherN
You wouldn't last a day at Apple CFO's office.

Yes, and you wouldn't last at any other position at Apple.

With your logic, no company would ever spend it's funds to push the industry forward, we would be stuck with the same exact products and features year after year. Great logic right there. :rolleyes:
 
And with that, circling the wagons is now complete. At this point, whether the phone ships with 3.5mm headphones or Lightning headphones, we'll be sure to hear how reliable these sources are because they got it right. :rolleyes:
[doublepost=1466514345][/doublepost]Well, what if I want to charge my phone and listen to my headphones at the same time? This doesn't make a whole lot of sense to me....o_O
 
  • Like
Reactions: Benjamin Frost
[doublepost=1466514345][/doublepost]Well, what if I want to charge my phone and listen to my headphones at the same time? This doesn't make a whole lot of sense to me....o_O

You can't - but Apple thinks you will pay a thousand dollars for that inconvenience anyway.
 
It certainly does not seem like something Apple would do, to keep the headphones with a 3.5mm jack and include an adapter. For the new iPhone they should just include Lightning headphones and an adapter, for those that want to use their own legacy headphones.

They'll keep selling the SE and 6s iPhones so those could use up any excess inventory of old headphones, although I doubt in Apple's case they would be overstocked in anything.

This likely shift away from the old 3.5mm headphone jack headphones, although it will cause some people huge amounts of angst, it will create a whole new set of products for people to lust after and then when the shift away from Lightning happens and headphones (and charging) go wireless, we will hear the same complaints all over again.

That's how it works, whenever significant change happens. Just think how the entire market reacted when Apple introduced the iPhone. No physical keyboard, a glass screen, desktop class web browsing. Huge numbers of people actively panned Apple and the iPhone. Yet here we are today and no one thinks twice about smart phones and the huge shift that happened.
 
Very soon, after most people have upgraded with the latest Apple products in most categories, we will be able to set up a unique contest with the title: "How many adapters do you have? ". Now, that would be the event.
 
That is a very un-Apple move.
Is there any leadership at Apple?
It seems like one faction (Ive?) is intent on getting rid of the industry standard jack.
Another faction is insisting that pain on behalf of the consumers needs a band aid.
It is very strange to me that they would not just ship lightning headphones instead. A kind of proof of concept "see guys it works!". Shipping an adapter and Apples cheapo earbuds is nice for people that want to use their Beats or Skullcandy or whatevs, but it also seems very kludgy.

Either way I think it's the mother of stupid Apple moves.
"no innovation my ass"




ps. I will not buy an iPhone with no earphone jack.
 
I can't see Apple ever making Lightning only headphones, if only because they would break compatibility with their own devices; remember that their brand new MacBooks still have a headphone jack to go along with the USB C port. Unless they did something really bizarre like ditching the headphone jack and adding a Lightning port to the next MacBook refresh, the only way to go from here (from Apple/Beats anyway) is wireless or a dual cable setup, whether that be a regular 3.5mm end so they can sell you an adapter or two separate detachable cables (think Audeze EL-8).

If anything I'm surprised they won't offer a pair of Bluetooth buds in the box, as an upsell of course.

You really think Apple will make their own customers use an adapter in order to listen to their new Lightning headphones with their new MacBook? They'll add a Lightning port mid-cycle the way they did to the iPad 3. And there are a number of other benefits to adding Lightning, besides essential compatibility with Apple's other products.

...except they've still removed a major weak spot from the design, replacing a half-inch crowbar sticking into the guts of the phone with a much smaller lightning connector designed from scratch to support the weight of the phone by spreading the force over a relatively large area of metal.

Now when your 3.5" jack goes all crackly you just buy a new adapter instead of sending your phone in for repair.

One question is whether the adapter actually is a D-to-A converter, of if they're simply using Lightning's "smart" feature to output analog audio when it detects an analog device - which would be the smart thing to do if you wanted to offer a cheap Lightning-to-3.5" adapter. The phone already has D-to-A to drive its speakers. In that case, the adapter could be really small.

Do you really think Apple is going to inconvenience customers making them use an adapter that does nothing more than change the shape of the connector? You don't remember the original iPhone headphone jack controversy do you? Besides size is the least of it, take a look at the Audeze Lightning headphones I posted on the previous page.apple will have to sell the removal of the jack, and they won't do it by offering a different analogue connector in place of one nobody has particularly been having trouble with to date.

The difference was the 30-pin connector was exclusive to Apple 3.5mm is a standard everywhere else so it would make some sense to maintain compatibility.

The difference is all mobile phone makers will likely be dropping the 3.5mm Jack too. So compatibility with 3.5mm just became meaningless on mobile devices, which is arguably the largest user base of 3.5mm adapter.

[doublepost=1466514345][/doublepost]Well, what if I want to charge my phone and listen to my headphones at the same time? This doesn't make a whole lot of sense to me....o_O

Really!? You really think this thought occurred only to you and not once to Apple? And now that you and millions of others have been pushing this ridiculous meme around the internet, Apple still has done nothing about it? There are so many rumored and existing practical solutions to this problem, I'm sure if you apply yourself, you'll figure it out.
[doublepost=1466516044][/doublepost]
You can't - but Apple thinks you will pay a thousand dollars for that inconvenience anyway.

Source for this "fact"? What is it with you people spreading FUD?
 
Well is not a bad idea at all, I often use my earbuds with my mac so with this solution I can continue doing it.

I don't understand. Your current earbuds work with your Mac. Any changes won't affect that...at all. Your Mac suddenly won't lose a 3.5mm port.
 
The right move woul;d be to have the 3.5mm jack but ship with Lightning earbuds. You provide compatibility to all our existing gear, but include a way to try yhe sound from the Lightning adapter.
 
  • Like
Reactions: MaloCS
I am not saying the new mouse is a bad product per se. But the charging process was designed in a very sloppy way. It's not what I'd expect from a premium product, to lay like a poor dead piece on its back. Not being able to use it immediately after it ran out of battery just adds to it feeling unfinished – it would fit a prototype or 10 bucks item from some Chinese rippoff seller. Apple didn't design the new mouse with all important aspects (which charging is for a mouse on battery) in mind – it feels like they realized last minute: "damn we need to find a way to charge this thing actually…"

I plug mine in once every other week while I use the restroom.

It's such a non-issue that anyone who complains is just grasping.
 
At least they'll include the adapter, instead of forcing you to pay some ridiculous price for it separately. They probably realized that building an ADC into the crappy white earbuds will cost as much as just including an adapter, so they might as well go with a free adapter, despite how much they love charging extra for those.

Since the vast majority of headphones use 3.5mm jacks, and it will probably remain this way for a very long time, you're likely going to have to use that adapter all the time. It better be small and rugged.

As for the earbuds you get with Apple products, who cares? They suck in every respect, I don't think that adding an adapter to them will be your biggest issue. You'll probably have to use that adapter on whatever else headphones you want to use anyway.

Let's just hope it won't look like this:
Headphone-Lightning.fw_.png
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: 147798
I just wonder how am going to listen to music through my headphones while charging my phone. I do that every night at bedtime.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Benjamin Frost
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.