That's literally the only post I've made about this where I didn't preface it with "If true…" or "If this is the case…". Go back through this conversation and you'll see. I was having a conversation with someone. I'm also looking forward to further confirmation as I was thinking about going caseless—although the revelations about the Jet Black scratching came out, so I've got a backup case just in case. Case closed.You don't know that it isn't sapphire and just simply has a coating on it. Stainless steel Apple Watches have an anti-reflective coating over sapphire that can scratch. iPhone screens have an oleophobic coating that helps to prevent fingerprints staying on the screen and that can also scratch (the screens aren't sapphire but the coating will scratch long before the screen does). It stands to reason that since it's so easy to test the authenticity of sapphire (anyone can buy a mineral hardness testing kit on Amazon for less than $20) that it's more likely that there is some coating on the home button/sensor and camera cover than it is Apple falsely advertising them as sapphire. It's not at all a stretch for this to be the case. On the home button, said coating would increase the accuracy of each fingerprint read since the surface would be less likely to retain oil from the skin with each press. Likewise, pictures would be clearer with each photo shot due to less need to wipe off the lens.
People around here need to stop taking the first YouTube video they see as gospel. It's not Apple apologia to not to so.
I'm so sorry…