Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
How about we wait until September to find out what benefits and costs this move will have. All we know right now is the cost, and you're ASSUMING the benefit is "nothing" and deeming it a "slap in the face" because we don't know the whole picture yet. Do you honestly think Tim or Phil are going to walk on stage and go "we removed the headphone jack, and in its place, are 6 additional ornamental holes that do nothing"?

I think everyone needs to take a deep breath - everyone's talking about their minds being boggled, a slap in the face, this being a crazy move and a betrayal of good design. That we're losing something is a near certainty - but we have no idea what the actual tradeoff (benefits) will be.


This site is called "macrumors" why do people's feelings get hurt when we speculate on "rumors"? Apple has a current track record of deleriving us half baked products
 
Dual speakers on one edge of the phone wouldn't be any different than just having one speaker anyway.
Unfortunately, most people commenting on this non-story don't understand acoustics. 2 speakers would be mere marketing with no substance. The many "advantages" of the competition are distinctions without a difference, and just mean that they are hoping to create marketing hype rather than providing real value. What everyone is missing is that the real advantage of Apple products is the simplicity of setting up an ecosystem where all of the machines that are supposed to make your work and life easier actually do that. It's in the way they seamlessly work together, the ease of use, simplicity of tasks, freedom of organization that they provide the user, not the me-too gimmicks of the mediocre.
 
Nothing new here.
Even cars have dual exhaust exits but only one with an actual exhaust pipe...

Age of the looks fellas...

xj7sn9nxk5vqplelsnrd.jpg
Except when you buy the real deal which is what I thought Apple was?
C63_coupe.jpg
 
Nothing new here.
Even cars have dual exhaust exits but only one with an actual exhaust pipe...

Age of the looks fellas...

xj7sn9nxk5vqplelsnrd.jpg
They really want you to know that it's a POS.

The easiest way to tell if something is an EV from a distance is to just look for a tailpipe. If any are present, it's a POS. If there's not, it's an EV (which doesn't rule out the possibility that it's also a POS, but it does reduce the probability to be less than 100%.)
 
  • Like
Reactions: Sandstorm
So we put fake speaker holes in the bottom for looks and symmetry, and we leave the giant pimple surrounding the camera lens? LMFAO.
If the new design is verified, the metal surrounding the lens is part of the whole unibody, whereas earlier it was a steel/chrome ring(which IMHO, looked much better ). The current one looks ugly in comparison.
 
If this is true, it seems counter to Jony Ive's overtures about a material or product needing to 'be true to itself'. There's nothing less 'true' about a purely cosmetic feature appearing to be something it isn't.

http://hypercritical.co/2013/05/03/beauty-truth-and-jony-ive

IMO you are taking that sentiment too far. Of course materials will be altered and ornamental bits will be added for aesthetics. The iPhone 5 had the same holes (they weren't all microphones). The 15-inch MacBook Pro and MacBook have speaker grille holes that don't affect acoustics. They're their height and width so they line up with the keyboard and look tidy. Sometimes engineering makes things asymmetrical or ugly in order to function; I don't think it's untrue to follow up and make things neat.
 
  • Like
Reactions: speedyyellow
This site is called "macrumors" why do people's feelings get hurt when we speculate on "rumors"? Apple has a current track record of deleriving us half baked products

I don't mind speculation on rumors: The iPhone 7 will likely remove the headphone jack next month. Fine.

I just think it's irrational, premature, and short-sighted to take offense when we only know the cons and not the pros of a design choice. I'm reacting to "Slap in the face" and other sentiments of hurt feelings from others getting worked up on incomplete information.
 
This may sound like sarcasm but it's not: is there actually any benefit to having two speakers that close together?

Yes. There are three benefits that I'm aware of: (1) potentially better volume, (2) potentially better sound quality as the result of more resonant space, and (3) avoidance of an issue where sound is muffled because one speaker is covered (e.g., by a thumb).
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.