Why though?
No it's not. Take the Macbook Pros for example, or the iMacs. Yes, CPUs may differ, but the general functionality is the same. Whereas in the iPhones, e.g. iPhone SE vs. iPhone 6/6+/7/7+ or no in the iPhone 7 vs. iPhone 7++ is merely artificial. They COULD provide the same functions to the smaller models, if they WANTED. I'm not talking about speed etc but things like 3D touch, camera, ... it just feels like they're pushing people to the larger (and more expensive

) phones if they want certain functions. Is it really so hard to understand that I might WANT those functions, but simply do not want a huge a** phone? Because it's simply too big for my hands?
Well, they offer "choice", it's just no real choice. See above.
Yes, for some people and that's perfectly fine. Yes, some people might prefer a bigger screen. Some DON'T! I'm not saying "don't offer a big phone", all I'm saying "offer a smaller screen, too". And btw. the number of people wanting smaller screens can't be that tiny or they wouldn't have offered the SE...nor would they have made record sales.
For me the iPhone is a PHONE, yes, with some nice additional functionality. But if I really care about the screen (e.g. for longer reading, movies, etc. pp.) I use my iPad. I personally am a fan of specialized products because I always feel trying to fuse different dive categories only results in compromises...
Well, I must be that odd outlier, then. My hands are too small even for the normal 7, I can't hold it comfortably, I can't really nicely use it with only one hand....wasn't that a pretty successful add way back "you thumb goes from here - to here"? Well...folks at Apple must have strange hands ...
Observation over the years. Also, I wasn't talking about future specs but at those supposed "options" nowadays which aren't really comparable options because of - you guessed it - specs.

