No, you referred to a section regarding "illegal hacking" which is in no way synonymous with "third party installation"
You're free to modify software yourself for personal use. You are not free to distribute or engage in the commercial use of said modifications if they violate laws respective to the original software, nor are you granted any defensible legal right to the operation or execution of infringing third-party software. In the case of the iPhone, that would be, at common law, breach of contract, and pursuant to 17 USC §§101, 103, 109, et seq. along with 35 USC §§101, 271 et seq., infringement of property rights, for starters. It hardly ends there.
I guess some people dig this, but I've never been one of those "winamp skinning, turn your cursor into a laser gun" type of guys.1) The ability to completely customize my phone to make it unique - icons, sounds, colors, etc. easily.
True. Actually, iCal should be updated with this functionality first, which would eliminate this need somewhat. There are some decent webapps for this stuff out there right now.2) ToDo List
No question here: some people could really use this. This is one of those things where if Apple won't let 3rd parties do it, they need to do it themselves.3) VNotes - voice recorder
eBook reader seems logical too. Same as above. I don't think I'd ever use it though.4) Books - Bible software and other ebooks of my choice.
This strikes me as one of those "native IM" situations. The web stuff is pretty much doing the job unless you have no wi-fi and no EDGE for some reason.5) weDict - reference library
To die for...no. More useful than wifi iTunes? Any day. It's not what we have now that excites me most...it's what will surely come if Apple doesn't screw this up.
I am sure everyone appreciates how you know what is best for them.I guess some people dig this, but I've never been one of those "winamp skinning, turn your cursor into a laser gun" type of guys.
True. Actually, iCal should be updated with this functionality first, which would eliminate this need somewhat. There are some decent webapps for this stuff out there right now.
No question here: some people could really use this. This is one of those things where if Apple won't let 3rd parties do it, they need to do it themselves.
eBook reader seems logical too. Same as above. I don't think I'd ever use it though.
This strikes me as one of those "native IM" situations. The web stuff is pretty much doing the job unless you have no wi-fi and no EDGE for some reason.
This is my main beef with the current hacker situation: it's like a catch-22. Apple should open the iPhone becuase it will spur some great 3rd party apps. But there seems to be very little need to *hack* the iphone because the benefit isn't worth all the trouble: the apps just aren't there yet. Only when Apple opens the iPhone would their be apps worth hacking to get: but then we wouldn't need to hack the phone to get them.
My head spins.
You might have to update your iTunes. I did.
I miss my ringtones already!!! arg. No good reggae ringtones on the ITMS. So bummed....
iBricking iPhones is another way for Apple to make money. They knew that literally 200,000+ thousand iPhones have been unlocked. Rage against the machine, but I love the wit of Apple. Apple is laughing their asses off right now. They realize that so many people are going to have to purchase new iPhones from this, they know that people won't make such an expensive mistake twice.
Don't be so sure that the iPhone will get hacked anytime soon either. Even if it does, people hacking it immediately are going to be test mice for the hackers and this will equate to more iBricks.
Apple is going to progressively make it harder and harder to hack the iPhone to a point where the benefits won't outway the hassle.
Jobs' is cracking up right now and knows that it's really the hackers that are the idiots. Talented idiots, but nonetheless, idiots in his book. It all generates more sales and more PR.
iBricking iPhones is another way for Apple to make money. They knew that literally 200,000+ thousand iPhones have been unlocked. Rage against the machine, but I love the wit of Apple. Apple is laughing their asses off right now. They realize that so many people are going to have to purchase new iPhones from this, they know that people won't make such an expensive mistake twice.
Don't be so sure that the iPhone will get hacked anytime soon either. Even if it does, people hacking it immediately are going to be test mice for the hackers and this will equate to more iBricks.
Apple is going to progressively make it harder and harder to hack the iPhone to a point where the benefits won't outway the hassle.
Jobs' is cracking up right now and knows that it's really the hackers that are the idiots. Talented idiots, but nonetheless, idiots in his book. It all generates more sales and more PR.
iBricking iPhones is another way for Apple to make money. They knew that literally 200,000+ thousand iPhones have been unlocked. Rage against the machine, but I love the wit of Apple. Apple is laughing their asses off right now. They realize that so many people are going to have to purchase new iPhones from this, they know that people won't make such an expensive mistake twice.
Don't be so sure that the iPhone will get hacked anytime soon either. Even if it does, people hacking it immediately are going to be test mice for the hackers and this will equate to more iBricks.
Apple is going to progressively make it harder and harder to hack the iPhone to a point where the benefits won't outway the hassle.
Jobs' is cracking up right now and knows that it's really the hackers that are the idiots. Talented idiots, but nonetheless, idiots in his book. It all generates more sales and more PR.
It's not a myth; it's the law. Your own modification is personal use, as has already been discussed. Once you take part in the distribution of materials in violation of law, you have entered the stream of commerce and are no longer protected by "personal use".Wow you've certainly bought into the myth of 'intellectual property'.
If you knew anything about the relevant issues of law, you'd know that no one, absolutely no one, endorses the idea of "owning knowledge".Its losing sight of the fact that all patent and copyright laws are for the benefit of the citizens not the creators as per the US constitution that we have come to the silly notion that individuals can own knowledge as property.
What a NASTY post - are you really happy because some people are having problems with a $400 - $600 dollar purchase?
I hope you dont have children......
'Test mice' WTF? The iphone dev people made excellent unlocking software for free - and it works perfectly.
The 'bricking' taking place today is mostly legit AT&T users who have had trouble with Apple's crazy 'update' and their foolish attempt to subvert the law.
NO unlockers are updating after all the warnings not to. Think about it.
FACTS:
(a) Legally, AT&T (or Apple) MUST unlock the iphone after 90 days if a customer asks them to.
(b) You can do what you want with your iPhone software as long as you dont sell it.
Iphone dev are giving the unlock away - no problem.
(c) In trying to 'lock' the non-phone parts of the iPhone, Apple have got themselves in a legal bind - the iPhone 'phone' part MUST be unlocked soon, even if Apple want to keep the rest of it locked.
These are the real issues, and its because the iPhone is COMPLETELY DIFFERENT form ALL other phones.
Its a COMPUTER with a phone in it - its the first to do this, and Apple will, hopefully, learn that 'locking' is illegal and foolish fairly soon now.
The PR is good, but ONLY if Apple unlock the iPhone. If they dont, the PR will turn very quickly against them, which would be a shame for such a GREAT product.
Chances of a class-action law suit are VERY high unless Apple backs down.
The customer is ALWAYS right - even if you think he/she is wrong.
I think Steve Jobs is asking how the f*** this mess happened, not laughing at all.....
*
Wrong on every point.
1) I question your 200K unlocked number. I find it hard to believe that many people unlocked their phones. Hacked, yes. Unlocked, no.
Hacked or Unlocked, the update is clearly taking care of 3rd party apps, iNdependence, ANYsim. You tell me:
iPhone Dev Team's response to their warnings. Here it is:
"Based on download numbers, the iPhone Dev Team believes that, worldwide, several hundred thousand people have unlocked their iPhones. That number continues growing every day. The removal of the lock, a bug, was a major step forward in the iPhone development. It made the iPhone free and useful to anyone, not only to those in certain countries.
Apple now announces that the next firmware update, expected later this week, will possibly break the handset of all of us free users in the World. It speaks of "damage" done to the firmware and "unauthorized access" to our own property, The removal of those firmware problems, which were built in in favor for AT&T, does not cause "damage" as they want to make us believe.
We will provide you with a tool in the next week which will be able to recover your nck counter and seczones and even enables you to restore your phone to a Factory-like state.
In the meantime we advise you not to update your free iPhone with the upcoming firmware. Wait for the next version to be fixed to work properly with your carrier and not break your phone.
2) The vast majority of those that unlocked are smart enough to read the clear warnings from Apple and not install this update. Those who did receive no pity from me. It couldn't have been more clear. Thus, I doubt that many phones got bricked. We're only hearing about the few that did. How many of those will run out and buy a new phone now? Not many, I'd bet.
If you're iBricked, you were warned. Unless you want to use your iPhone as a door stop, contemporary art piece, or curio, it's very likely if you want to use that iPhone, you'll have to buy another because you'll be SOL.
3) The phone will get hacked again, and I'll bet it's only days...maybe a couple of weeks at most. Perhaps I'm overly optimistic, but it's only a matter of time.
It may, but it may also be such a pain in the a$$ to hack, most people won't even mess with it. Think of all of the anxiety people had with this update, it's just going to get worse from here on out.
4) Why would they do this, exactly? Makes no sense. Eventually, they will realize the futility of this foolishness and come to their senses.
They did this because of contractual obligation and lost revenue. Why should Apple let people do what the hell they may? Just because you buy the technology, this certainly doesn't mean you own it. Some however feel different and Apple WILL WIN in the end, no matter how much people hack the iPhone, the iPhone architecture will only continue to improve in future revisions making it harder and harder to hack.
5) Hackers are idiots? Right........
Anyone dumb enough to buy another one after Apple's tantrum broke their current one needs therapy. The first step to moving on is to admit the abuser doesn't love you and doesn't want to get better. Apple doesn't want to make the phone extendable and they are actively working to block your ability to do the same. Until the inevitable lawsuit compels them to knock it off or enough people vote with their wallets they will not change. You are nothing but a revenue stream to Apple. Hopefully Google will destroy the iPhone business with an open GPhone.
I like the Mac, and I put up with the crappy hardware choices available to the consumer, but Apple releases an update that breaks my Mac it would not be replaced with another one.
GD! i updated because people on here stated that ringtones converted via the mp4 to m4r way or whatever still worked. well... they don't! i'll admit the speaker is louder and that was the only reason i wanted to update. the wifi music store is pointless since i don't buy music from itunes. i want a few apptapp programs, but am sick of missing call after call because of the low speakerphone/weak vibrate alert.
so thanks for the misinformation people.
FACTS:
(a) Legally, AT&T (or Apple) MUST unlock the iphone after 90 days if a customer asks them to.
*
Please show me this law.
Oh wait, you can't, because it doesn't exist.
You're missing the point. The software is no longer compatible with the device. Apple stated that they're not supporting third party apps, which means that some might work, some might not. They're being up front about this. Now it's up to the third party software community to update their software. This is no different than when an OS is updated and an application stops working.
In the case of the iPhone, that would be, at common law, breach of contract, and pursuant to 17 USC §§101, 103, 109, et seq. along with 35 USC §§101, 271 et seq., infringement of property rights, for starters. It hardly ends there.
Yes, that is true. What I am calling into question are the claims of illegality.
Makes me wonder if you had read all the posts... First of all, it's the .m4a files that still works, and for it to work, you have to have iTunes 7.4.2, and you also have to assign them to your contacts first before you update to 1.1.1
after the update, you cannot go and check if your ringtone still shows up in the list, if you do, it will revert back to default. As long as you don't click on the ringtone to change, it will remain in the phone.
So, it's not misinformation, you just need to read more carefully, there is no time restriction on updating your iPhone...![]()
Does anyone know how to adjust the alert volume? I thought this feature was part of this update.
And by "bricking" your phone there is none.
This is not a case where Apple transmitted something with the sole purpose of disabling your phone (similar to what the US cable companies wanted to do in the 80's to cripple people who hacked their boxes), but instead, you as an user hacking your phone and then allowing Apple to install software that expects the phone to be in a particular state (not hacked) when the update is sent.
It's not their (Apple's) fault that we, as users, opted to hack our iPhones, now is it. And they did give everyone ample warning of what might happen, now didn't they.