Let us dreamPeople wanting this to be redesigned are missing the point. This phone exists specifically to fulfil a price point. They won't want the development and retooling costs involved with designing and manufacturing a new phone.
Let us dreamPeople wanting this to be redesigned are missing the point. This phone exists specifically to fulfil a price point. They won't want the development and retooling costs involved with designing and manufacturing a new phone.
Yes I jumped in Apples trap. I don’t want Apple to set up traps.Have no idea what people are expecting to gain from the latest iOS on such an old device. Apple set up a trap and you just jumped?
If it looks like the iPhone 5 again, then that design won’t be dead until 2020. That’s insane!
Thanks for letting us know.I would love a new SE, but won't buy an India-manufactured device.
Four-incher lovers, rejoice!![]()
When they first released the SE it was with the processor and camera from the just released iPhone 6S. I think they’ll do the same this year with the iPhone 8 processor and camera. Gives it that wow factor, takes away from the budget stigma, and will last two years before the next update
![]()
![]()
https://www.gsmarena.com/weekly_pol...rred_but_not_overwhelmingly_so-news-26455.php
I wouldn't be 100% confident for an SE based on the X design. I have used Sharp Aquos Crystal and Samsung Galaxy S7 edge only to realize I don't like edge-to-edge. Bad ergonomics.
What functional benefits do bezel-less or taller displays have? It's a COSMETIC GIMMICK like curved displays and LG V-series' second display are! Buyers are falling for Samsung's display trap that is curved like on their TVs and smartphones.
Oh wow! I can see more info in portrait. I can see the entire photo of the diplodocus on this page without the need to gently swipe up to scroll down! So beneficial! LOL!
![]()
![]()
^ After my Street Fighter II reference, just had to do one for dinosaurs. Loved dinosaurs, wildcats ("ThunderCats, Ho!") and astronomy as a child. Diplodocus, my fav dinosaur, next to Bob Barker (a straight Herbert the pervert) and Betty White (thank you for being my friend).
There is nothing beneficial from a taller display no different than a curved one or an LG second display. It makes reachability more useful. That's all. After 2.5 years, users realize what a gimmick a curved display is. The only thing the SE3 might benefit from having the X design is gaining Face ID.
Right now, the X design is the buzz but people will eventually grow tired of it like they did to James Cameron's Titanic and Avatar. It's like checking a movie's high IMDb score before it goes down. I could eventually live with an SE based on the X but the novelty will wear off like playing the Nintendo Wii after a month.
It's like loving the iPhone 6 Plus at first before growing wary of it and its awkward size. Looks fade on people. I don't find Jessica Alba attractive at all because she lacks talent. I came to realize the only iOS devices that will offer a metal back are iPads! An iOS device that doesn't change the design much.
I would be 100% content if Apple doesn't change the design and just update the SE specs every two years like they do to their iPad minis and MacBooks. Just give gesture controls via software update, and I'm good.
Your "common sense" may differ from other peoples "common sense".Common sense. How many years have SE been on the market so far? How many people do you know that actually talk about it or own it compared to how many own 6/7/8? I could tell you right away that profit margin for resellers on SE is even worse than on regular iPhone. It's iPod like.
You have nothing to back up the above.They have tried with 5c and then they tried with SE, it's not working. To me SE is the best phone they have cause it's still a phone first everything else second and it doesn't cost arm and a leg AND it has that timeless design that Apple abandoned within just two generation to try to blend in with Androids.
I assume if they go with an A10 rather than an A11 it will be cost/ economy of scale related, or maybe even a result of limited A11 capacity that’s currently being taken up by the iPhones 8 and X. They’re putting the A10 and A10X in a huge number of devices, similar to the A5 - the A10 is in the iPhone 7 series, rumoured to be in the iMac pro, adding in the SE, maybe the ‘2018 ipad’ and/or ‘iPad mini 5’ and perhaps a 7th gen iPod touch would mean they can bulk order the chips as they’re already likely reducing in price anyway due to being ‘older tech’. The more devices they use the chip in, the thinner the cost of its design is spread and the higher the margins they begin to make on the devices. Having only 4 cores it’s likely inherently cheaper to make than the A11 with 6, even leaving aside the smaller process and all.Still, I see no reason the SE shouldn't get the latest internals. They did it last year.
And if I remember correctly, people were predicting that the SE would originally get the A8 chip. So maybe they're wrong this time too.
invest is wrongly used... invest is to put money into sth. that multiplies the money... an iPhone, a car will never be an investment (the value is depreciated out of the box)... in large, you are right... I just say that, we over emphasise on design (and pay too much for it) and forget about the basic utility and functionality of the product (we start not to see the forest for the trees)... in our case, the hardware without software is just a brick... the problem with computers nowadays, with this type of architecture, have nowhere to evolve... we reached a threshold... people want new things every year and that's the reason design is a gimmick used to sell... we will see what future withholds... voice activated devices are nowhere to go unless AI is becoming the norm... in the fast moving world you don't have time for Siri's errors or basic tasks that it does... we have to forget about turning heads... a Mac, an iPhone doesn't have to be the big gold neckless, an expression of a poor person trying to impress... a Mac and iPhone is about one thing only: SOFTWARE = functionality, usability, UI, UX... put the best hardware in the market, make a nice case and stop fulling me with face ID to open my phone at $999... and coming back to the topic, Steve Jobs, again, was right... an iPhone (portability, ease of access, one hand access in a split second in a tube, quick pictures when you move, split seconds to e-mail, music, web, maps and so on) should have the screen no more than 4" (a compromise - from 3.5")... for home, office, library, coffee shop etc buy a tablet or a laptop or a desktop... I want to keep my phone and operate it with ONE hand...That’s an oversimplification. For one, consumers don’t invest in cars with the same cadence as a phone or computer, nor is automobile obsolescence so rapid. And even car designs evolve over time whereas the current iMac design has not. I don’t dislike it but it doesn’t exactly turn any heads the way it did 5 years ago.
As for the inside, I would like to see Apple return to modular hardware or at least give their computers a decent heatsink that will not destroy the chipsets in a couple years’ time, instead of pulling impossible stunts like the iMac Pro. And overhaul the MacOS in more meaningful ways than shoehorning Siri.
Let’s face it, since Jobs’ passing its been a disaster for the Mac and maintaining (re)design cycles.
He does not need anything to back himself up. We are not in a court. We are on a rumor forum where people give their opinions.Your "common sense" may differ from other peoples "common sense".
Common sense is not a measurable factor, and in your comment amounts to nothing more than an "anecdotal experience", which is meaningless.
You have nothing to back up the above.
Yeah. I hope this rumor is wrong because it's too soon. We need the rest of the iPhone lineup to transition to the bezeless design before the SE gets its a major redesign.
Then the phone isnt for you!!! Seriously though if they keep the $350 price point that would be a good deal for a fairly high performance phone.Those specs aren’t that compelling
yeah. agree. probably someone who’s parents buy their phones for them posting.Only the shallowest most irrelevant of people think some person's level of "lameness" is in any way factored by what year their pocket phone was designed in.
I guarantee you the owners and users of such handsets, do not care.