Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
The 14 is the smallest phone on the market right now.

If people left iPhone for Android, they’d be going to larger phones.
The 14 is the smallest high class smartphone on the market right now. There are smaller, cheaper ones from mostly chinese manufacturers.

Why would Apple want that? It’s an entire extra production line, requires more deals with more manufacturers, needs a lot of R&D, extra support. Their entire business model is to keep all those factors as simple as they can get away with and charge premium prices for the products they do sell to off-set conquering the entire market against low profit margins.

Apple could get into the business laptop market too, easily, but then they’d ruin their reputation as premium laptop builders so instead of catering to 95% of the markets, they just up the profit margins on the devices they do sell and are still doing better than all other laptop manufacturers combined.

“Well enough to make a profit” is not what Apple wants to be known for amongst shareholders.
Not wanting to cater to the "cheap" market is something else than simply not selling a device class.

If you include the iPad line Apple is selling everything from a rather compact digital assitant (iPad mini) to full blown workstation laptops. None of them are cheap, but they cover pretty much the entire range. Same for desktops, where they offer everything from the Mac mini, which is considerably inexpensive even for PC standards, up to a (currently a bit lacking) Workstation PC.

If you consequently applied your R&D, support and supply chain centric logic .... Apple should only sell the iPhone and maybe the Pro Max, since every other model they offer pales in comparison, especially the Plus, which sells almost (if not) as bad as the mini. Even more so: with this logic applied selling the SE doesn't make a hint of sense. Even if most of the hardware is basically old parts: since you actively cater to a market that is not willing to buy your high priced options you willingly compromise on margin, while still having to manage an albeit mostly existing supply chain and support an additional device 5 years down the line - plus there is some R&D even in the SE.

So, no, I respectfully reject that logic as flawed. There is a market for smaller phones, and I believe if the new SE really is basically the 14 all over again this will become very much apparent. The one thing I am willing to concede is that there is no room in Apples lineup for both the SE and the mini. Since it's inception the SE basically functioned as the "small" phone. The SE1 was the small alternative to the 6 to 10 era, and the SE2 and 3 filled that role since then. Cramming in a high priced flagship mini was the problem.

People that prefer a smaller phone are more utility centric. You want a portable device that works for communication and organisation, allows some basic time killer games or basic video consumption, works for navigation and to look up the next restaurant in a yiffy, and that has a camera to capture a nice moment, scan documents or document a car crash. They are the same crowd of people that are fine with buying basically a 3-4 years old phone with reduced features if it only does those things, has a decent few years of software support and costs a good bit less.

The SE crowd IS the mini crowd. And yes, two devices for one demographic .... that really ain't the way Apple does things.
 
I'm still hoping for a mini size. But, I think those hopes were squashed many years ago.
 
I just ordered a new SE 3 while Apple still sells them.

I wanted to look at the price and they are not sold anymore here, same for 14 and 15, because of Lighning...

I bought a refurbished (not by Apple) 256GB SE2 for less than €250 and a 256GB SE3 for less than €400 last year in April. Hope I can get one or two SE3 for the same price as the SE2. At the end of the year the prices were still similar.

I only remember there were refurbished SE3 in the Apple Store at the same time and even the 64GB was more expensive.
 
Weird how a SE model will have same amount of ram as the pros
If the AI cannot be turned off (I don't know), it could be permanently allocated to the AI. So the available RAM for other tasks could be small, or even worse than before. Something to keep in mind.

And if the AI can be turned off, I think it will not be in the future. Apple will consider it an integral feature of the iPhone, totally embedded.
 
The 14 is the smallest high class smartphone on the market right now. There are smaller, cheaper ones from mostly chinese manufacturers.
Really? So lots of people are going to go from a secure iPhone to a Chinese spyware device with inferior cameras, processors, screens and no OS upgrades?

SCR-20250208-nrpf.jpeg
 
I hope I am wrong, but there certainly is a history of SE not exactly matching the current mid-tier on either RAM or (baseline) storage:
  1. 2016 SE was 2/16 versus 2/16 in iPhone 6S
  2. 2020 SE was 3/64 versus 4/64 in iPhone 11
  3. 2022 SE was 4/64 versus 4/128 in iPhone 13
Considering that parts and r&d expenses are substantially higher for a mid-tier than for an SE, I can't see iPhone 15 getting cut from the lineup entirely. But if a 8/128 SE 4 out-specs it, how will an 6/128 iPhone 15 sell at $599-$699 altogether?

Knowing how SE is commonly lower spec'ed than the current mid-tier(s), it seems much more likely that iPhone 15 gets lowered to $599 and that SE 4 only gets 6/128 but then keeps the $429 price. Without 8GB RAM, neither will run Apple Intelligence.

Keeping SE 4 at 6/128 is a good upgrade compared to the 4/64 SE 3 but will leave plenty of incentives to spend more and get an $599-$699 iPhone 15 instead, like (far superior) rear dual-cameras, Dynamic Island, (more) premium "infused glass" finish, U2 Ultra-Wideband chip, brighter display, and more.

Again, I hope I'm wrong. The 8/128 SE 4 with AI is just too much value at <$599-$699 compared to a 6/128 $599-$699 iPhone 15 without AI. The line-up falls apart with that much value/$ in the budget, SE option.
6GB RAM is effectively obsolete thanks to AI. They're highly unlikely to put it in a product that's designed to stay in the lineup for several years.

The first SE also had better internal specs and camera than the iPhone 6 it was sold next to. This SE reminds me more of that idea than the souped-up iPhone 8 variants.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Tagbert
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.