Ahh, spend more money and get a model with what you want…Having only one camera is a terrible decision because this product will probably have a decent demographic and without a second camera there won't be spatial photos/video, which doesn't help them build up that ecosystem that Apple Vision Pro is really kind of lacking. I hate when Apple makes decisions like that.
Disappointed to see the raised camera island on the rear again. In previous renders only the lens was raised which looks so much cleaner.
The market already said people want a bigger displayPlease, please, please... use 5.4 inch display...
Be our new mini!
If those rumors are true, iPhone 15 will disappear as soon as the “16E” will be launched. iPhone 14 was already removed from EU websites.dont be surprised if they stop selling the 14 and 15 completeley.
all in on apple intelligence.
Very unlikely. If there is a Dynamic Island, FaceID will be there.My thoughts are that these will not have a "dynamic" island - just a dynamic Island shaped cutout.
That the island will only house a regular camera, not Face ID.
Touch ID on the power button like the IP Air.
MagSafe is missing too.Why would anyone buy an iPhone 16 over this? The only difference that’s noticeable to the avg user is the second camera, and how many base model purchasers even caree
Consumer complaining ? Where ? Only on MacRumors consumers complain about Dynamic Island. I’m perfectly fine with it.It's still a notch! Apple even calls it that internally.
"Dynamic Island" is just the marketing term that Apple boffins came up with after years of consumers complaining about the gap.
It seems that people really do have their rose colored glasses on when it comes to the Apple bubble.
iOS 13 is working perfectly smoothly on my son’s iPhone 13 and on my other son’s iPhone 13 Pro.You should stay away from iOS 18 and beyond even though it wouldn’t bog down your iPhone:
iPhones 13 and older only have 4GB RAM (or less).
And in my view that’s just enough to run iOS 18 but not enough to do so smoothly.
iOS 18 also doesn’t offer much additional features that iOS 17 didn’t have.
Only Apple Intelligence is a genuine addition that isn’t available in iOS 17.
But your iPhone doesn’t support AI so there’s no reason to move to iOS 18.
MagSafe could be missing.I wonder what the trade-offs will be compared to the base 16, because this will 100% replace the 14 and 15.
- One camera
- Apple modem/no mmWave
- Probably no U1/U2 chip? Or if anything it'll get the U1
- No action button
- No camera control
I really don't think this will ditch the Dynamic Island or MagSafe, especially if it's based off the iPhone 14. I also don't think they'll ditch Face ID for a side button Touch ID solution a la iPad, because that hasn't been done on an iPhone and the SE is the last place where they'd develop a new component like that.
My worries are that Apple will do something *really* drastic to keep prices low, like starting at 64GB storage or using an LCD screen.
“It’s not the customer’s job to know what they want” - Steve JobsThe market already said people want a bigger display
? Just compared my 13 Pro with my 15 Pro, the notch is bigger than the dynamic island.
In a private social media post, Blass shared an image
Say what now? Private and social...in one sentence?
“It’s not the customer’s job to know what they want” - Steve JobsThe market already said people want a bigger display
This is pretty much an iPhone 16 without the ultra-wide camera and Camera Control. Seems too good for an SE.
Since MagSafe has been there on iPhones 12 through 16, and this SE 4 is based on one or a combo of those, it would be very unlikely that Apple doesn’t include it in the SE 4.Surely they won’t have a new phone that doesn’t have MagSafe?
unknow leaker but yet they say his name lolIt's cute.
But the regular 16 doesn't have ProMotion either, unless they're strictly thinking ahead to the 17.The catch is the camera and the Apple 5G modem. And no 120Hz promotion etc.
Its basic ergonomics. Large phones cannot be used comfortably with one hand for the 95th percentile of people. We've all done that weird finger-fu thing required to just summon notifications. I guarantee the majority of dropped phones (and cracked screens) are someone taking a bump from a passerby whilst doing it. People will point out bigger screens are better for consuming social media but don't stop to consider whether this is even a good thing.“It’s not the customer’s job to know what they want” - Steve Jobs
Hmm… The market is a convenient fiction. “People” do not universally want a bigger display. Many want a return to the mini or the original iPhone SE size.
The Minis sold a fair amount, but didn't make as much money as the higher margin, high-end phones did. Same thing happens when national chains close certain locations. They were often profitable, but not as much as HQ wanted.
Apple should bring back a small phone — just as they should release an M series 12” MacBook. After all, if they can sell an iPhone SE, #X, #X Plus, #X Pro, they could certainly sell a Mini as well. It would generate enormous buzz and good will.
Lose the notch & DI, and bring back a real home button, too! (Alas, that last ship has sailed!)
I didn't find the 2nd or 3rd SEs too good. As you said the battery and some of the specs didn't quite keep up. The original SE I totally agree, it actually got higher battery life rating by Apple than the 6S that came out just months before.Each SE that has come out so far seemed "too good for an SE" at the time it launched.
Having owned both the first and second generation SE, the single biggest drawback was the poor battery life compared to its more expensive siblings