Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
In the end, I really hope the iPhone SE 4 will be based on the iPhone 13 mini, but with only a small cutout for the front selfie camera, Touch ID on an enlarged power button, and a single rear camera sensor.
 
I have a feeling Apple is going to come out with their version of a flip phone and that will satisfy the “small” phone market.
A flip phone doesn’t provide two features that make small phones attractive: lighter weight, and thumbability (reachability). Also, they have to be flipped open to use them, which is somewhat less convenient.
 
  • Like
Reactions: OJK
A flip phone doesn’t provide two features that make small phones attractive: lighter weight, and thumbability (reachability). Also, they have to be flipped open to use them, which is somewhat less convenient.
Yes but if you look at the Z Flip 4, you can perform various every day tasks in clamshell mode on the front small screen. The Z Flip does weight more though at 6.60 Ounces.
 
All 3 of you are only slightly correct touching on the surface.

The first iPhone SE, which did stand for Special Edition officially, was modeled exactly after the iPhone 5S. As
Greg “Joz” Joswiak, Senior Vice President, Worldwide Marketing stated back in 2016 this device was created because Apple realized a LOT of iPhone users love the design of the iPhone 5S and chose NOT to upgrade to the iPhone 6/6S at that time.

People forget that SPECIFICALLY - and wonder why the iPhone SE/SE 2 and now SE 3 have yet to grow in physical size - yet consistently keep saying it's not about being small and small is just a trade off of least cost of manufacturing. Although the latter is true, you forgot this is Tim's Apple and highest AFP or profits/units sold - should be the highest!

iPhone 12 mini and 13 mini each have higher profits per units sold than the SE2/SE3 the latter having the same chipset as the 13 mini.

Since the SE OG model is no longer around to be used it cannot be used to be the cheapest. The iPhone SE 3 probably, imho not getting the sales numbers as the SE 2 did?? Most than likely the marketing team (a joke in my opinion) has decided the new 'Small' is 6.1" screen - just like they figured to right an iPhone mini "sales mistake" is to make a larger screened base iPhone vs actually facing the real sales mistake is their utter incompetence to NOT market the mini's as their own devices:
iPhone 12 launch showcased the 12 mini, straight with James Bond theme as an aside to Sony Picture Studios (owns 007 movie rights) and Sony Mobile (whom cancelled making the 'xperia compact' lineup just 3yrs prior). Not the first time Apple has selected Sony to pick on (aka Jobs 'they got the sex' Vaio laptop lineup reference when launching the TiBook G4).

We'll see if this product choice comes to fruition, something I hope will not occur, and how successful it'll be.

I'll hold Kaianne and Vitor Silva responsible if the 14 Plus fails and this upcoming iPhone SE 4 does as well. They are at fault for the mini's sales failure. Most iPhone users didn't even know about the mini's and many that did was due to iPhone 12 launch mention and all the youtubers busing out about how good it was.

The name was the problem with the mini. Also it needed to be another $100 cheaper. A $100 upgrade to get away from something labeled “mini” is really no choice at all.
 
  • Sad
Reactions: DeepIn2U
I told ya! This was always most likely. I probably won't want to buy it unless it's made a more neat size and weight like the iPhone 12 6.1". But the 6.1" form factor is a huge cash cow.

It has been too many years since the iPhone 6-8 shape and that 4.7" or even 5.5" screen is nowhere else in the market - look at it from Apple's point of view as a company. The same goes for compact sizes. We won't see either of those things again, as much as we wish for them.
 
No, no, no. The mainstream consumer will settle for a smaller smartphone like an SE if the price is low enough.

But settling is not the same as preferring.

Go talk any consumer electronics store or phone carrier across Europe or the U.S. -all of them have struggled to sell 12 and 13 mini even after they’ve been discontinued due to their 6.1” counterparts outselling them.

Price always comes before other considerations, and a vast section of consumers either can’t or won’t pay $699-$799 for a new iPhone. So they settle for a $429 one.

But if they could get a new 6.1” iPhone for $429 essentially all of them would get the 6.1” over one that is smaller.

Why? Because the average, mainstream consumer wants as much smartphone for their money as they can get -Between a bigger iPhone and a smaller one, the bigger will have a bigger display and a bigger battery.

There’s no way around the physical limitations that size differences put on smartphones.

The average, mainstream consumer needs the display size and battery life of a 6.1” smartphone. You’re not going to spend all day on socials like TikTok or do emails, video calls and texts for hours at good brightness on a SE or mini sized iPhone. It’s physically not possible.

Look at Apple’s decision to put out a Plus size version of it’s mid-tier iPhone and then tell me again how there’s a significant demographic that wants a smaller than 6.1” iPhone?

Smaller iPhones, regardless of high-end internals, read to mainstream consumers as older, less capable, less social capital smartphones compared to 6.1” and larger.

mini is dead. SE is only popular because a real, contemporary, full-sized iPhone starts at $799. Case closed.
Yes, yes, yes. Because people who want and prefer a smaller phone most probably don't spend time on TikTok all day.
 
Thinking about it further, adding this iPhone SE4 in the XR design would mean there would then be three 6.1" iPhones in the line up - SE4, regular 6.1" iPhone and then the iPhone Pro also with a 6.1" screen ... i mean that would be utterly pathetic from Apple if they actually did this. Great variation in sizes there Apple LOL.
 
Yes, I think SE should now stand for Secondhand Edition :)
Switcher Edition, or Senior Edition seem to work too. It makes sense to give a performant taste of the ecosystem to those curious users, and helps utilitarian seniors on a budget not gravitate to samsung.
 
there would then be three 6.1" iPhones in the line up (…) i mean that would be utterly pathetic from Apple if they actually did this. Great variation in sizes there Apple LOL.
Well, they already did it on the (much lower-volume) Macbooks. ;)
helps utilitarian seniors on a budget not gravitate to samsung
I think many of them would actually benefit from a bigger screen. Not saying that eyesight or tactility was a huge problem when seniors bought iPhones 4 or 5, but with increased usage of apps on phoned, some should appreciate bigger screens.
 
In 2 years, make the iPhone 12 mini the se, and the regular iPhone 12 the se plus.

This is cheaper to produce than another lcd based iPhone, just make everything oled, seems cheaper to me.

Apple is just worried that their upsell strategy won’ t work as good, with a better(and cheaper to produce se) .
 
It would seem the market for small phones is quite small, sadly. I just ordered a 13 Mini to replace my 11 Pro though.

Did Apple ever produce a tv commercial for the Mini? What was the advertising budget, did Apple put any effort into selling them?
 
A flip phone doesn’t provide two features that make small phones attractive: lighter weight, and thumbability (reachability). Also, they have to be flipped open to use them, which is somewhat less convenient.
I never got that thing with not reaching the top left. I can reach it easily on any iPhone max by holding the phone on my fingers. This is only an issue when someone grips his phone very tight but again I don’t get why they do that.
 
I never got that thing with not reaching the top left. I can reach it easily on any iPhone max by holding the phone on my fingers. This is only an issue when someone grips his phone very tight but again I don’t get why they do that.
The issue is that with a large phone you cannot do anything else in parallel... In your example you also need to change position of the phone in your hand to be able to reach upper left corner. So it becomes a bit unstable and inconvenient.
I am sometimes on the bike while eg quickly checking google maps or so… very troublesome with anything bigger than an iPhone 8. And easier with a mini sized phone.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: klasma
It’s interesting that your argument is based on a theoretical privacy invasion as opposed to an actual demonstrable privacy violation

Theoretical violations are certainly a concern here. To be clear, I am not thinking of the contents of the secure enclave leaving the device - I'll assume Apple are correct about that, and similar data could probably be found elsewhere. Insights derived from querying the facial recognition sensors are what I'm thinking of; more along these lines: https://www.theguardian.com/media/pda/2010/sep/27/advertising-billboards-facial-recognition-japan

Are they already doing it? Can I prove it? I don't consider that this matters, for they have put in place a system that would allow them to do things I dislike, and I'd be reliant upon their goodwill to not abuse it.

I can't find it right now, but I recall a tweet at the time the iPhone X was launched saying something along the lines of "normalizing that your phone looks back at you is the real harm Apple has done, despite good intentions and care".

Of course, most of us tolerate some sort of invasive technology for its convenience or out of necessity, such as having a Facebook account because it's the only way to keep in touch with a particular relative, and so on. We must each choose where to draw the line; having my phone watch me is one I won't cross.
 
  • Like
Reactions: OJK
Would it not make more sense just to keep the 13 Mini around for a few years with just a chip upgrade every two years? I say this as a Mini fan. The design is fine, IMHO. It could work as a niche product for a long time..
 
  • Like
Reactions: OJK and klasma
I never got that thing with not reaching the top left. I can reach it easily on any iPhone max by holding the phone on my fingers. This is only an issue when someone grips his phone very tight but again I don’t get why they do that.
See this iPhone 5 ad:

And then this iPhone 6 Plus parody:

You can’t reach all of the screen on a bigger phone one-handed without changing you grip and moving your palm towards the front of the phone, instead of keeping it at the back with a safe grip.

Or maybe you have spider fingers. ;)
 
Last edited:
  • Haha
  • Like
Reactions: Gudi and OJK
Is temporal dithering as much of a problem for people as PWM is, or is this much more of a rare issue for people out there to encounter?
Just curious as I have heard of plenty of people (here online, and even myself to a degree) with PWM sensitivity, but hadn't heard about sensitivity to temporal dithering.
It seems to be affecting a subset of the people already sensitive to pwm.

Here’s the weird thing for me personally. I’d been getting headaches and eye strain from SOME OLED displays and none on the iPhone 11 and SE 2022. BUT, twice now, I’ve noticed after prolonged use of Apple LCD phone displays that there’s a white shimmer in the left side of my left eye’s vision. After almost a year of majority LCD use, the shimmer was overtaking my left vision.

I got my 14 Pro Max and put the LCD phones in storage and my vision is almost back to normal. I did go to my opthamologist with this problem and he assured me my eyes are very healthy. Now I just have to get myself on a waitlist for an appointment with a neurologist.

As far as pwm is concerned on the 14 Pro Max, I seem okay.
 
Would it not make more sense just to keep the 13 Mini around for a few years with just a chip upgrade every two years? I say this as a Mini fan. The design is fine, IMHO. It could work as a niche product for a long time..

Sure. If Apple‘s data analysis determines that there is opportunity for more profit in an iPhone like this, they can add it to the lineup as a separate product.

But, assuming the rumor holds, no, this apparently could not be demonstrated to be a better business case for the fourth generation SE than using the XR/11 form factor. As a Mini owner, this naturally disappoints me, but it certainly does not shock me.
 
I’m not sure what an SE would offer at this point if it’s not even a smaller firms factor.


I want a 15 mini or mini pro.
The SE historically was about repurposing a previous gen chassis with updated internals for a cheap price. Size was not specifically the factor.

What a hypothetical SE 4 would offer is the ability to get a bargain for an Apple product. The day before the SE 3 was announced, I bought an SE 2 from my carrier for $199. Sure, it's locked in to the carrier. But I've got a great no-contract plan and have no interest in changing providers, so $199 (total and final cost of the phone) is a great deal.

When the SE 4 is released, the carrier will sell that for $199 as well.

Given that you are interested in the 15 Mini or Mini Pro, it is pretty obvious that you aren't the target market for the SE.
 
  • Like
Reactions: MartyvH
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.