See you in 2008. Seriously, release things when they are promised.
Apple "promised" iPhone in June. What is your evidence that Apple will not deliver that? Even this latest "dire" rumor says late June.
See you in 2008. Seriously, release things when they are promised.
Apple "promised" iPhone in June. What is your evidence that Apple will not deliver that? Even this latest "dire" rumor says late June.
Rebello speculates that the delay in Leopard was prompted by an unexpected shift in personnel from Leopard to the iPhone
There goes my stock!
Don't blame Apple for the shortcomings of other companies.
why is everyone in such a rush? Apple should get it right and if that takes longer then so be it. You'd hate to be the first one with the phone and have to return it or wait for some software update...wouldn't you? Hey if it takes until the Fall, that's alright by me.
Sure. When Leopard is delayed - it's because of other companies. When Vista is delayed - it's because of Microsoft is piece of junkIt's hard to do that when you depend on other companies to supply the components.
It's just like when Apple claimed the G5 would be at 3Ghz, but due to IBM's fab problems, they never got to their declared goal.
Don't blame Apple for the shortcomings of other companies.
It's Apples product.
They're responsible.
For making things happen, getting things in, making judgments of when they can get it released and setting release dates.
Now they promise that iPhone will be shipped in June, and believe me, somewhere on 20's of June they'll say that it'll be delayed because of third party something.
Sure. When Leopard is delayed - it's because of other companies. When Vista is delayed - it's because of Microsoft is piece of junk
I doubt iPhone will be delayed, there's too much publicity surrounding it. If worse comes to worst they'll just launch without a few features and release a software update later.
This is not news. It appears this "rumor" came out a week too late. The first sentence in Apple's Statement clearly mentions:
"iPhone has already passed several of its required certification tests and is on schedule to ship in late June as planned."
They have always said June, but have never specified when in June. I'm so tired of people twisting rumors into reality and then claiming Apple is late when their "new reality" doesn't pan out.
People are doing the same thing with iLife and iWork rumors. Apple has never admitted to new versions even being planned, yet people are complaining that they are now late. Just because Apple released previous versions at a certain time in previous years does not guarantee that future versions are to be expected at the same time, folks.
That's something Microsoft and others have been criticized for. I do NOT want to see Apple make the same mistake. There's a book on this very mistake:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Mythical_Man-Month
Doubling the number of programmers or engineers does NOT halve the time to complete a project--especially when they are dumped in after the fact. Throwing late staff additions at a product can actually reduce quality and make the project even more behind until features have to be cut.
"Assigning more programmers to a project running behind schedule will make it even later, due to the time required for the new programmers to learn about the project, as well as the increased communication overhead."
All this speculation is why Apple doesn't pre-announce products. Makes you wonder why they have done this with the iPhone, AppleTV, and Leopard. Maybe it's a strategic decision, but all this idiotic speculation and commentary makes me wish Apple would go back to keeping everything a secret until it's released.
All this speculation is why Apple doesn't pre-announce products. Makes you wonder why they have done this with the iPhone, AppleTV, and Leopard. Maybe it's a strategic decision, but all this idiotic speculation and commentary makes me wish Apple would go back to keeping everything a secret until it's released.
It's hard to do that when you depend on other companies to supply the components.
It's just like when Apple claimed the G5 would be at 3Ghz, but due to IBM's fab problems, they never got to their declared goal.
Don't blame Apple for the shortcomings of other companies.
Why does Apple not just hire a few more engineers/developers/QA people? Sounds like they could use them anyway in the long term.
According to the analysts, the component suppliers are delivering on time, though. Unless they are wrong on that count as well.
It's not an AAPL stock price drop, it's a buying opportunity
*I realize the proper grammar is "Think positively," but I just wanted to riff off Apple's grammatically-(ahem!)interesting slogan.