When they announced that Leopard will be delayed, they said that the iPhone is shipping in late June.
Well, maybe they meant 10 PM of June 11. That's kinda late.
When they announced that Leopard will be delayed, they said that the iPhone is shipping in late June.
The total price of the package is what matters, not just the price of the phone, which by itself is irrelevant.
if you were planning to sell it in July then maybe you'd have a problem but if you keep it for ten years or longer like most shareholders used to. You will have a very nice nest egg.
That's something Microsoft and others have been criticized for. I do NOT want to see Apple make the same mistake. There's a book on this very mistake:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Mythical_Man-Month
Doubling the number of programmers or engineers does NOT halve the time to complete a project--especially when they are dumped in after the fact. Throwing late staff additions at a product can actually reduce quality and make the project even more behind until features have to be cut.
"Assigning more programmers to a project running behind schedule will make it even later, due to the time required for the new programmers to learn about the project, as well as the increased communication overhead."
See you in 2008. Seriously, release things when they are promised. If Apple would, from the onset, add three months to their 'original' ship estimates and then release things *cough* early, Steve would look like a hero, and the stock would soar. Just a thought.
this is just great
apple delays leopard and now the iPhone
apple really needs to stick to what they say
See you in 2008. Seriously, release things when they are promised. If Apple would, from the onset, add three months to their 'original' ship estimates and then release things *cough* early, Steve would look like a hero, and the stock would soar. Just a thought.
They never said ready june 11th, just ready in june. Since they also reconfirmed that in their recent press release I bet they will realease it on time (in June) since i can't wait to get my hands on one, june does still feel like a long time
They gotta make sure the iPhone is insanely great and insanely punctual.
What you said is absurd. Apple being responsible for their own products ship time is not.
With "great" being the more important of the two, if anything should interfere with achieving both![]()
Update 2: A speculative Mac Observer post by John Martellaro (ex-Apple employee) attributes some of the timeline issues to poor staffing by Apple.
Apple, despite being a large and wealthy company these days with likely more than 18,000 employees, is actually a very lean organization. And that lean configuration has been maintained, even though the demands of the iPhone, the Apple TV and Leopard would have suggested a moderate increase in staffing. Despite all better judgment, Apple hates to ramp up to meet these kinds of expansions in the product profile.
this is just great
apple delays leopard and now the iPhone
apple really needs to stick to what they say
That's something Microsoft and others have been criticized for. I do NOT want to see Apple make the same mistake. There's a book on this very mistake:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Mythical_Man-Month
Doubling the number of programmers or engineers does NOT halve the time to complete a project--especially when they are dumped in after the fact. Throwing late staff additions at a product can actually reduce quality and make the project even more behind until features have to be cut.
"Assigning more programmers to a project running behind schedule will make it even later, due to the time required for the new programmers to learn about the project, as well as the increased communication overhead."
Now long term do I think the iPhone will rock? Yes. Sure. No doubt. But I want to see two things. Real world use of this thing by real people and Apple get some real experience under their belt. Wake me on G 2.0. Actually maybe even G 3.0.