They need it to work well: especially as some of the first customers (those who camp out to get it) will visit MR straight away...
from their iPhones
They need it to work well: especially as some of the first customers (those who camp out to get it) will visit MR straight away...
from their iPhones
The only problem I see with that browser ID string is the "Safari/419.3". Safari build 419.3 is the Safari build that comes with OSX 10.4.9. I highly doubt the OSX running on iPhone runs the same build of safari build as the OSX 10.4.9 does. And webkit 420 is the webkit that ships with OSX 10.4 .. again, I doubt the iPhone will have the same build of WebKit as the full blown OS.
I'd say somebody at apple is playing practical joke on people. Who could it be, Steve himself?
update: ok, so i'm a bit wrong. WebKit build with 10.4 is 419, OmniWeb currently supplies with 420. Still, I'd expect the iPhone (as well as Leopard) WebKit build number to be higher.
I wonder if it makes phone calls too?
Well, it was confirmed some time ago (by the mods) that Apple employees occasionally browse the site.
The only problem I see with that browser ID string is the "Safari/419.3". Safari build 419.3 is the Safari build that comes with OSX 10.4.9. I highly doubt the OSX running on iPhone runs the same build of safari build as the OSX 10.4.9 does. And webkit 420 is the webkit that ships with OSX 10.4 .. again, I doubt the iPhone will have the same build of WebKit as the full blown OS.
I'd say somebody at apple is playing practical joke on people. Who could it be, Steve himself?
update: ok, so i'm a bit wrong. WebKit build with 10.4 is 419, OmniWeb currently supplies with 420. Still, I'd expect the iPhone (as well as Leopard) WebKit build number to be higher.
I don't think Steve would take advice on how to run his company from a stranger. But what if...
Look into my eyes not around my eyes! 3 2 1 *Click fingers* Your under. You will first class mail an 8GB Sim free iPhone to my house now! 3 2 1 your back in the room!
If you don't know what I am on about click here or here
I thought that Macrumors was blocked from use at Apple, unless its a legit test by R&D.
It might not be blocked as such, just not aloud to be used.
Besides I do not believe that Apple stated that it was going to run Leopard or did they?
Makes sense that it is Tiger based.
They were probably checking to see if the iPhone was still shipping at the end of June.
See 2007/05/19 01:34 c-24-7-124-164.hsd1.ca.comcast.net Mozilla/5.0 (iPhone; U; CPU like Mac OS X; en) AppleWebKit/420+ (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/3.0 Mobile/1A530a Safari/419.3
831919
Anyone knows who from apple attended Virginia college?
mymowser.com shows they were visited.
More at ualberta.vmitchel looks like same unit
... Windows NT 5.1; SV1) 675695 2007/05/19 01:05 c-24-7-124-164.hsd1.ca.comcast.net Mozilla/5.0 (iPhone; U; CPU like Mac OS X; en) AppleWebKit/420+ (KHTML, ...
If I find more ill add it to this post
Anyone find it odd that the second one is Windows NT 5.1 ??
It's just a missing line break. That would be the end of the previous log entry.
If this proves that folks at Apple look at MacRumors, then they clearly must have some idea of what users really want. Hopefully, they read the thread that was a nearly unanimous negative on the demise of the Mini, because it can't go away.
Well, it was confirmed some time ago (by the mods) that Apple employees occasionally browse the site.
* waves to Apple employees *
And, it's news because it proves there are actual functional units roaming around, and we can determine some (but not much) information from the browser string.
I bet Apple Employees also want to know what the rumors are. They probably don't know everything that's behind closed doors at Apple either.
As for the testing... good. Let's hope they're testing the iPhone browser 24/7... to make sure it works on as many sites as possible.
Apple would be insane NOT to have functional units being tested within a month of the product's launch.
It might not be blocked as such, just not aloud to be used. Plus I bet this visit was just to test how the iPhone can deal with forums and the layout of Macrumors (a lot of people who are going to buy the iPhone are most likely going to visit MR).
why would the traffic come from an apple internal ip (17.*.*.*) address? surely if the phone is on cingular/at&t's network, the ip address of the phone would be an ip address assigned to cingular or at&t?
32 more days till the iPhone launch can't wait till the announcement next monday!!!
why would the traffic come from an apple internal ip (17.*.*.*) address? surely if the phone is on cingular/at&t's network, the ip address of the phone would be an ip address assigned to cingular or at&t?
... No, it was never explicitly stated that the iPhone will run Leopard. However, it was stated in the keynote that the iPhone uses Core Animation, which is a Leopard-only technology (as far as we know).
why would the traffic come from an apple internal ip (17.*.*.*) address? surely if the phone is on cingular/at&t's network, the ip address of the phone would be an ip address assigned to cingular or at&t?