Yeah, but think of it this way: If they sell 2nd tier LCD models for a decent price, and OLED flagship models at a high price (but hopefully not quite as high), they can steer customers toward the flagships, while keeping the cost of the 2nd tier models down for those who buy them.Record-breaking profitability lauded just days ago (again) seem to imply that there is abundant profit in this very model... the bulk of the record results were attributed to this model driving up average price paid for an iPhone.
So I kind of buy your thinking, but it would seem there's some room for it to shift into former model at lower price and still yield plenty of profit for Apple... especially based on how popular it is per stories like this.
Again, some of you are getting fooled by the way the numbers have been framed. As mentioned before, reports were that OLED sales were less than expected.So... the pre-earnings call cries of doom are proved to be simple blather of know-nothings. Now they'll turn around and say Apple's earnings are a sign of pending bankruptcy.![]()
This makes perfect sense as the iPhone X sold way, way less than the iPhone 7 in the corresponding quarter last year, and also significantly less than the iPhone 7 Plus too that quarter. The iPhone 7 sold a whopping 30%+ more units in 2017 Q1 than the iPhone X did in 2018 Q1.
Also, total unit sales of the 7 and 7+ outsold the total unit sales of the X, 8, and 8+.
Last edited: