OLED displays? They're 'awful,' says Apple's CEO Tim Cook
http://www.cnet.com/news/oled-displays-theyre-awful-says-apples-ceo/
http://www.cnet.com/news/oled-displays-theyre-awful-says-apples-ceo/
Yes most people say the colours no matter what it's display don't look naturally - more artificially enhanced but if you look at the same thing with the human eye you noticed world's of difference. As far as I know samsung's oled panels are locked as far as saturation goes, as I don't believe you can even adjust it in any way to even come close to say lcd - it's basically all or nothing. It may be an inherent feature of the technology where you cannot tweak it. As my previous post indicated, anything with a white background on oled will drain power pretty quickly. The major advantage of oled is no backlight so the display can be thinner.
So if you have no idea what the lifespan of the technology is your point is irrelevant right? The "life of the device" may be much longer for some than others. Since processors are getting so fast now, new iPhone's aren't going to become obsolete for a decade unless Apple forces iOS updates that slow down the old hardware. If an OLED screen failed after 3-4 years of regular use it'd be a nice form of planned obsolescence for Apple's bottom line.
Hope this isn't true, or else that Apple finds a way to get around the shortcomings of these displays. Working at T-Mobile, I noticed there's burn-in on the Samsung Galaxy display phones because OLED displays basically act like plasmas.
I use iPhone 5, but get my iPhone 6s next monthThe Apple website says it is LED backlit.
I'm waiting for the day when they drop the numbers and just call it iPhone.
The point is if it last the 99.9 percent anyway it doesn't matter. No device has an unlimited life time. And I'm sorry if someone is still using the original iPhone is 2018 they have no right to complain. Even computers people shouldn't complain about 10 years. These things aren't cars.So if you have no idea what the lifespan of the technology is your point is irrelevant right? The "life of the device" may be much longer for some than others. Since processors are getting so fast now, new iPhone's aren't going to become obsolete for a decade unless Apple forces iOS updates that slow down the old hardware. If an OLED screen failed after 3-4 years of regular use it'd be a nice form of planned obsolescence for Apple's bottom line.
Oh great... In 2018 we'll have a new "displaygate" involving LG and Samsung with people going crazy because they ended up with the wrong brand of display.
Remember back in the day when the iPhone was cutting edge?
This doesn't help.
OLED displays? They're 'awful,' says Apple's CEO Tim Cook
http://www.cnet.com/news/oled-displays-theyre-awful-says-apples-ceo/
i'm thinking they will start calling it applePhone soon
I agree. The 6S will probably be usable for five years.
At what frequency a led is considered "no-flicker"?Samsung's AMOLED screens are a PWM nightmare. Their flicker pattern includes drops to zero brightness at most settings, and at many brightness levels it isn't even fast enough to mask the flicker..
LG's TV panels are PWM-free like Apple's current LED backlights (Apple is one of the few companies that insists on no-flicker LEDs BTW). It's hard to say what will happen at the mobile scale though; The PWM of Samsung's AMOLED is used to reduce power consumption.
Question: Will this help with the yellow tint?
As they all don't. I never had any such issues with my S3.Until after a year and the display begins turning a sickly yellow brown, as they all do. I've been hearing about how perfection in OLED is almost here, for ten straight years. It is BS.
Well, considering that lifetime in 2008 was 14,000 hours (OLED) [vs. 25,000 - 40,000 (LCD); each to half brightness] which would be 4.8 years with 8 houres usage per day...considering that back then there were prototypes with more then 62,000 hours...I think it's safe to assume that with an average expected lifetime of a smartphone of 2-5 years (and most likely less then 8 hours of active display per per day) I think it's rather unlikely taht one will run into lifetime problems with OLEDs even in 2015...They said they are looking to fix those problems which is why it wouldn't be till 2018. Regardless, if the screen lasts 10 years instead of 20 it's pretty irrelevant in a phone. Do keep in mind I have no idea what the life times of each technology is. I'm simply saying if it last the life of the device it really doesn't matter.
That may be true for the original owner, but I hand my devices down to family. I have the phones for 2 years, then trade up, and hand down. I've seen some over 5 years. Would this effectively kill that?Well, considering that lifetime in 2008 was 14,000 hours (OLED) [vs. 25,000 - 40,000 (LCD); each to half brightness] which would be 4.8 years with 8 houres usage per day...considering that back then there were prototypes with more then 62,000 hours...I think it's safe to assume that with an average expected lifetime of a smartphone of 2-5 years (and most likely less then 8 hours of active display per per day) I think it's rather unlikely taht one will run into lifetime problems with OLEDs even in 2015...