So if the CEO and Founder of Apple says that the iPhone uses the same OS as my Mac Pro, should I automatically start calling my iPhone a crippled Mac Pro?
But the last thing I'll say about the iPod Touch is that by stripping out the phone features and the Bluetooth features, the iPod Touch can never be a mobile phone.
Well, these are opinions, so neither side will give in! I used the word 'crippled' as I am convinced the absence of these programs is purely a marketing decision. This is an omission of existing SOFTWARE... of course software has a cost, but it is not the same as having different hardware.
I think the iPod touch is an awesome iPod for someone in the market - but for someone like me who already has bought 4 since they came out, I would prefer something that could also save me a few trips to the computer - often I am only looking at a couple websites and checking my email. I sure don't want the hassle of typing in my credentials each time using webmail for this simple task. Having Google maps would be excellent for when you need to check an address quick before leaving - I've woken up the computer many times for this solo task too.
Hardly essential requirements, but they would be features that make the iPod touch just that much more compelling and cool - knowing that Apple has made the best product they can. Instead, I feel that they will add these features later and screw the early adopters. I had no problem with the lack of bluetooth and camera hardware.
The iPod touch has a touch keyboard - is there any other device out there with a keyboard that does not have even a simple notes application? This is purposeful omission by Apple, and I will not support it!
Imagine that Address Book and Mail were integrated on the Mac Pro, but not if you owned an iMac. If you complained, would you want someone to say "Oh well, then buy a Mac Pro?". There is nothing to suggest the iPod touch is not completely capable of running those missing iPhone apps!