xsnightclub said:back of ipod
on anti static wrap
siting on faux wood
in front of an Apple Keyboard
(L) said:Is this problem unique to me?
xsnightclub said:back of ipod
on anti static wrap
siting on faux wood
in front of an Apple Keyboard
CoMpX said:Hmm, it seems to be. Mine says page 35, I don't know about others.![]()
pdpfilms said:Ohh my G0D!!!
I really hope you're kidding.
TMA said:Boardslippy -
It's already been discussed a little in this thread. I suggest you go back several pages and read up.
mmmmark said:Apple's mob squad lawyers would be all over every site that posted these pictures IF they indeed were real.
They've descended on sites in the past for simple information, let alone photos.
We would have heard about this in the mainstream media if they HAD fired up the lawyers. Have you heard anything? I didn't think so.
And before you say, "well, they haven't had time," it seems like they have pounced in mere HOURS in the past.
I'd love for these to be true, and who knows, maybe this ONE TIME, Apple hasn't sicked their legal eagles on everyone, but how likely is that?
CaptainValor said:Also, I don't find it the least bit ironic that one of the copy/paste lines is by the upper left black block.
cr2sh said:Why must you insist on tellings others "This has already been discussed so please don't talk about it anymore." For the record, its annoying... I suggest you knock it off.
Templetalker said:Mmmm delicious point. I think what you think. One thing that could further lament this discourse? Well, I'm wondering if, if, Apple listed a job search and patents recently that relates to the touch screen technologies, why would this puppy be out of the kennel wagging its tail just a couple of moons later?![]()
mazola said:Steve Jobs is a vengeful god.
As reprucussion for the leak of the video iPod (MacPod?) photo, he will decide not to announce it on Tuesday.
Instead he will unveil a new line of iPod socks and try to convince us that they are 'fun'.
And we will believe him!
![]()
nagromme said:Interesting things to think about. But tour average unretouched photos doesn't have SELF-illuminated objects in it.
I see both sides, but here's where I end up:Boingy said:Are you serious? If people are too lazy to look through the thread and instead innondate us with questions that have been answered a hundred times we shouldn't tell them to RTFT?
cgingrich said:1. It's deffinately a B
2. Chinese says "this side" possible it's for a QC station to make things faster/less likely to get broken
3. Pic is VERY detailed (reflection, screen through label)
4. Deffinately some sort of ipod, not tablet or pda, although might have some pda functionality, (see second pic, it's held by 2 fingers so it's not a tablet)
My guess....A new TRUE video ipod with limited pda functionality....wireless/bluetooth capabilities would be amazing (connect bluetooth keyboard accessory for typing)
My hope....A new front row interface![]()
Maybe. But what do they mean?nagromme said:* Back on topic: does anyone think those markings on the brown tape are Chinese characters?
nagromme said:* Back on topic: does anyone think those markings on the brown tape are Chinese characters?
nagromme said:* Back on topic: does anyone think those markings on the brown tape are Chinese characters?