my receivers second zone can work on a different device as the main device. Most 1000$+ receivers will be able to do this. Keep all your devices in one spot and run wiring for the rooms. Its nice having my ps4, 4k blu ray player and shield in my room. Been doing this for 10+ years now.
I think you are talking about something totally different than what I and many others need.
Maybe you missed a post:
In the US it is very common to have multiple TVs in a home. If the choice is between buying an ATV4K or Firestick 4K, a multi-TV home could be fully equipped with streaming devices for the price of one ATV4K.
Run cables to each room and have main devices then. I control all my living room devices in my bedroom with one HDMI cable.
What if two different things are playing at the same time?
This wouldn't work at all with my family.
If I am following you correctly, you are talking about using a device like the ATV that is in your living room, and playing or displaying it elsewhere in your home. This would not work for most families.
I have six people in my family, and this requires multiple devices, not just one to serve the whole house.
I am unsure if you are in the US, but it is very common to have multiple TVs throughout a US household especially with a large family. If you have four TVs, and want to watch four different things at the same time, then you would need multiple streaming devices.
Using one device for all TVs just wouldn't work unless everyone wanted to watch the same exact thing.
In my home currently, I have an ATV4k, ATV4, FireTV 4K, and Firestick. I would prefer to have all ATV4K, but then you are talking about $800+. Or, I have the ATV4K on my main TV, and use the old ATV4 on another one, and much cheaper devices for my kids. Everything is just a fraction of the price of getting all ATV4Ks.
I understand people like cheap even if they work like crap.
Well, "crap" is subjective.
I told you before that I prefer the ATV4K over the competition, but it is easy to see why the cheaper alternatives are more popular, as they can basically do everything that the ATV currently does.
Not as fast, and not as nice, but performs adequately for what they are looking for.
It is like getting an expensive sports car to get groceries twice a week. Yeah, it is faster, nice looking, and more fun to use, but maybe not worth that price foe what it is being used for.
They just see an expensive streaming box and don't get why it costs more.
This is Apple's fault. Maybe the Apple TV 4K would sell more if they would give it a little more attention.
In a months time, I see more advertising for Apple TV+ shows than I have ever seen for the Apple TV since its launch in 2007. It would be nice if Apple cared more about the ATV4k, then maybe it would be more than just an overpowered, but overpriced streaming box.