And I'm in almost all AP classes,
How can you be successful in life if you can't cheat? It's called teamwork. In business, that's how you become successful! You can't run a successful business by yourself; you can't be an expert all by yourself in business laws, tax laws, interpersonal skills, financial skills, etc. You need other people who can help you. What they teach you in school is the opposite of how life and business works. In business or life, you don't have all the answers. You need help from others. So what are you trying to teach your students when you tell them they can't cheat?
It's only natural people want to come together and help each other to build a stronger business, community, or team. But in school, that's called cheating. Your local high school/college football teams practice and work together, trying to win upcoming games. Aren't they cheating?
It's no wonder why people leave school dumber than they enter it.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yCUu9OO5a10
What? Trying to say teamwork is cheating is utter nonsense. There is a massive difference between the two. One is pooling resources to get things done in a legal way, the other is intentionally bypassing the rules to get something you don't deserve.
So the rule is that in one case, you can work together, and in another case, you can't?
Have you ever made an achievement all by yourself, completely independent of anyone else's effort?
Most people in the western world can't even get to work by themselves, they depend on their car, which is a result of teamwork by thousands of people, putting in millions of hours of research, development, engineering, and experiences. Not to mention all the people who drilled for oil, ship, refined, and supply it to you, so you can use it as fuel for your car.
THAT IS NOT CHEATING. Wow....
And yes you totally can have situations in which you can't use teamwork...you know...like your actual final exam (you can use teamwork in study sessions and the like).
Again, that's what school teaches you, but that's not how real life works.
Hate to break this to you...but it does.
http://www.washingtonpost.com/world...5eaffa-b5e0-11e3-b899-20667de76985_story.html
No, that's a false cover story. I've been following that. The officers refused to blow up a nuclear bomb in Charleston, SC. Instead, they blew it up in the Atlantic ocean. So what did Obama do? He had to let them go.
Final exams are inherently independent in nature, therefore, not a test of collaborative efforts or teamwork. So to contemplate cheating or to actually successfully cheat on any type of exam, in my opinion as a public school teacher of 27 years, is to cheat yourself out of the value of being able to individually assess a problem, critically analyze what is needed to solve the problem, and then apply the skills you have gained throughout your education to successfully solve a problem on your own.
Teachers and College Professors are just lazy and don't want to do their jobs. They want the students to teach themselves. Now they'd rather punish everyone because of the possibility someone may or may not cheat. How about going with a project based approach that encourages people to be good at finding out information rather than trying to mandate a non cheating policy simply by banning smart devices? The most useful people are those who can find out information the fastest and apply the concepts rather than those who are good at memorization.
So the rule is that in one case, you can work together, and in another case, you can't?
Have you ever made an achievement all by yourself, completely independent of anyone else's effort?
Most people in the western world can't even get to work by themselves, they depend on their car, which is a result of teamwork by thousands of people, putting in millions of hours of research, development, engineering, and experiences. Not to mention all the people who drilled for oil, ship, refined, and supply it to you, so you can use it as fuel for your car.
Those information you studied in your textbook doesn't just appear out of nowhere. The discoverers had their own inspiration, they learned from others and pushed science and knowledge further. You don't go from being a caveman to learning how to build a spaceship in a day. It takes lots of learning from all your previous peers, generations after generation. The textbook is just a condensed version of it. All you really need to do is try to memorize some of it and re-apply it's theories or methods onto examples that's been done over and over. Why try to figure out a problem that has already been solved a million times already? Get help so you can get it over with it quickly, and move forward with innovations.
...and you seem like the type of professor who doesn't want to be graded on their merit but would rather take tens of thousands of dollars from students and parents while not teaching anyone anything.I'm sorry I don't recall meeting you. You just made a huge blanket statement about all educators at every level of academia. I'm a professor and I currently teach at several universities. I love teaching and wouldn't trade it for the world, and I work very hard. Having set rules and expectations for codes of conduct and ethics are important throughout life. How is that "punishing" everyone? Espouse your views to your future employers when they are trying to assess your ability to follow the rules of that agency, and see how sympathetic they are to your lamentations.
Unlike whatever field you are studying, my field of Social Work has an understanding of rules/ethics and their importance in society, even if it is to help advocate for change. Do you really want someone who is training to be a therapist cheating on their exams? Do you want that person you are talking to about your traumatic experiences checking their smart watch to find the information to see what they should say to you to help you work through that?? Would memorization at that time have been a bad thing in learning their therapeutic techniques? (We also complete internships to have hands on experience)
In my classrooms there is already a limitation of the use of electronics unless it relates to what we are actually doing, or as an academic aide for those with special assistance needs. This would include any electronics.
Your statements sound very similar to the students I teach at an Ivy League university who pay a lot of money for an education, but when held to rules and standards they cry foul. It also doesn't help that there a "B" is considered getting an "F", so as instructors we do not have many options. Any time I have attempted to grade a student on the "actual" quality of their work, that would be met with a lack of support from the administration "hmmm they seem to have "A's" in their other classes...), push back from families who expect the "A's" that they have paid for, or in the case of non-tenured faculty, not being asked back to teach.
I really tried to not respond in this thread, but your laments pushed an already absurd thread to new heights.
What you call "expecting student's to teach themselves" I call being able to show you can apply learned concepts through critical analysis, not by being spoon fed. And about the memorization, please don't go into law, engineering, science, mathematics, or medicine as I do expect those professionals to be able to work independently and have a significant portion of their learning memorized.
slighty OT: are exams in the US really multiple choice most of the time like in these HS and college movies lol?
I'm skeptical. Everyone has help. I can't think of another situation outside of academia where you were in a final exam type of situation....minus maybe the interview but studies show interview tests etc are unpredictable with relation to the success of individuals who are put through these tests. Tests don't show if someone can apply the knowledge or concept. They show how good someone is at test taking. That's it.THAT IS NOT CHEATING. Wow....
And yes you totally can have situations in which you can't use teamwork...you know...like your actual final exam (you can use teamwork in study sessions and the like).
Again, that's what school teaches you, but that's not how real life works.
In business, let say I'm good at running a business but I have little knowledge on taxes. So what do I do? I can hire a tax professional.
In school, you can't do that, right? Because that's cheating. You need to know it or you'll fail the exam.
You're a tool. An uneducated one it seems as well. . . rationalize away. Cheating is simply cheating. Your Mom must be saint to put up with you. Good luck in life.
...and you seem like the type of professor who doesn't want to be graded on their merit but would rather take tens of thousands of dollars from students and parents while not teaching anyone anything.
I never said students didn't need to put in the work themselves. I said the teachers and professors are lazy and don't want to put in the work when they are being paid to teach. They expect the students to teach themselves....but always have their hand out for more money and there isn't much benefit in the real world that justifies the cost of education going up way more than everything else.
Since you brought it up, I was the guy in class who actually read the the materials and came to class prepared. I skipped a whole month of class and still outperformed students who actually had to put up with listening to the professor when it came time for the final. I didn't have my parents there begging for a higher grade on my exams. I worked 3 jobs and was on scholarship.
What's the point of having a professor if the students like myself don't need them for anything and wind up teaching themselves? By and large most college professors aren't useful for anything other than trying to get themselves published...along with the various consulting jobs they take on the side. If the professors actually got graded on how well they taught students like grade school and hs teachers are you'd see a big difference in the performance of students. Instead people are grading on a bell curve rather than giving people what they earned for marketing purposes.
The bottom line is rather than trying to prevent cheating by micro managing students many of whom are grown adults...maybe just maybe it's better to challenge them. Teachers want to be able to run the answers through a machine and call it a day rather than actually grade projects and presentations that will be infinitely more valuable in the real world than how good of a test taker someone is.
teaching students /= spoon feeding students
The "I can't teach the students because that's spoon feeding them" is the lamest excuse for a teacher or professor not doing their job I've ever heard. Of course like many professors you resorted to blaming the parents because the failure of the professor/teacher/student. If the professor can't motivate students to learn, then maybe they are in the wrong profession and if the students don't want to do their part they should flunk out regardless of their parents monetary investments.
Definitely. I test horribly in math because of math anxiety. Planning on keeping the formulas on it.
To clarify: my programming courses require a C+ in math to take them. I'm great at programming, good at math, terrible at testing. I missed a C+ by two questions on the final. Not letting that happen again. I'm sick of spending money without needing to. Had we not had a final, I would have had an A