Now OTOH, i wouldn't put it past them to coat the antennas on the newer phones and replace later for those who still drop a lot of calls.
Well if they do that I am glad I got mine when I did. I wouldn't want a coating on the metal band.
Now OTOH, i wouldn't put it past them to coat the antennas on the newer phones and replace later for those who still drop a lot of calls.
Yes, and thats called a bug.
Thats not an intentional misrepresentation of the facts. Just think, why on earth would Apple be interested in artificially increasing the reception readings? What could they gain from such an action except for the financial, PR etc. losses and problems? You have to be nuts to do something like that deliberately.
Wow. I can't believe how non-thinking some people can be.Yes, and thats called a bug.
Thats not an intentional misrepresentation of the facts. Just think, why on earth would Apple be interested in artificially increasing the reception readings? What could they gain from such an action except for the financial, PR etc. losses and problems? You have to be nuts to do something like that deliberately.
I don't think there is real evidence out there of defective hardware or even of a flawed design. If you read that Anandtech analysis, they concluded that even with the problem, the antenna gets far better reception. Honestly, you have no idea how the signal level that gets reported for the bar display affects whether the phone drops it's connection and how it attempts to maintain it.
We can only wait and see what the results are after the fix. I'm confident that no matter what happens we'll see posts claiming it did nothing other than make a cosmetic change whether that's true or not.
[snip massive image]
![]()
So if youre still experiencing low signal, and you have the thing in a freaking case, that means its not the issue everyones talking about, and youre just in an area with bad signal.
Doesnt that make more sense?
jW
Use your common sense: no single public company could survive such a blunt lying campaign youre accusing Apple of. You dont get the second largest company just by accident. Apple is not that plain stupid.
Yes...yes they are.
Yes, and that’s called a bug.
That’s not an intentional misrepresentation of the facts. Just think, why on earth would Apple be interested in artificially increasing the reception readings? What could they gain from such an action — except for the financial, PR etc. losses and problems? You have to be nuts to do something like that deliberately.
MY GOD... something you and I can agree on!!!
YES THEY ARE!!!
where did you get that stat?..what are you basing that on?
Apple is #73 on the Fortune 500
Everything Apple said today was mentioned and verified by an independent reviewer 2 days ago.
Apple is absolutely correct, and the press release is fine.
You shouldn't be allowed to post this ridiculous banter without having read the anandtech review.
http://www.anandtech.com/show/3794/the-iphone-4-review/2
Did you read the same anandtech review I did?? Apple's press release does address the problem of misreporting the strength of the signal, but it does nothing to address the 20dB of signal loss! The previous iPhone had a loss of 2dB. You're telling me that's not a problem? It's a freaking order of magnitude!
No YOU are insulting our intelligence.
RETURN THE ****ing phone you damned whiners!
Seriously, go return the phone! And leave the rest of a super majority of us who don't have the issue alone. Obviously there isn't enough reception in your area regardless of how you hold the phone.
RETURN THE PHONE and stop insulting our intelligence by insisting Apple's wrong but keeping the phone anyway!
Put your freakin' money where you mouth is!
Why do you think you're in a super majority? The two polls I've seen puts the numbers at about 50-50 for those who have experienced the problem and those who haven't.
Why do you think you're in a super majority? The two polls I've seen puts the numbers at about 50-50 for those who have experienced the problem and those who haven't.
As for there not being "enough reception," that's part of the complaint: the reception was better on the 3G and 3GS.
Did you read the same anandtech review I did?? Apple's press release does address the problem of misreporting the strength of the signal, but it does nothing to address the 20dB of signal loss! The previous iPhone had a loss of 2dB. You're telling me that's not a problem? It's a freaking order of magnitude!
Really? Internet polls!? LMAO!
RETURN THE PHONE!
The fix won't fix your issue because it's a reception issue not a design issue. If you can't get calls now, you ain't gettin' them after the fix.
A poll shows nothing. People actually tested it and said although the phone does drop more reception than some other phones it doesn't drop it enough that it matters. If you're not getting the reception now, you ain't never getting it.
Return the phone and quit bitching.
I believe the review also said that the iphone 4 could hang on to calls much better at lower signal levels. They also said it ultimately has better reception than the previous iphones. Just use a case. For some people I think the new phone will have better reception in the places they frequent and for others it will be worse. If you are unhappy, then return the phone. Personally, I have experienced the death grip issue at work but I had bad reception with my old iphone there anyways so I dont worry about it.