Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.

Attachments

  • moto360_2.jpg
    moto360_2.jpg
    12.7 KB · Views: 462
How do we know that Steve didn't come up with stuff that was rejected? Remember he didn't want video on iPods, didn't want to bring iPods to Windows, didn't support an App Store for iPhone, didn't support a smaller iPad. He wasn't always right.

It is well known that Apple was really "Steve's Apple". So if it went to market, Steve said "Yes". Period. Whether or not stuff he came up with was rejected behind the scenes is irrelevant (we don't see those products as customers). But I don't think Steve came up with designs, I believe he came up with requests. The designers designed and submitted samples to him, the Steve would say "no, no, no, yes but.., no, tweak this...", until the device was what he liked

Also, no one said Steve was always right. That is a knee-jerk response. He wasn't always right, but he was rarely wrong with end-item products.

That said, we still have a visible and comparable design shift at Apple upon his departure, and the results are clearly polarizing, whether you fall in the "like" or "don't like" camp. It appears the farther we get from his influence (time wise), the more obvious this becomes.
 
Not Revolutionary IMHO

For me, the idea of smart watches is not a revolutionary idea and falls into the making everything "smart" mentality.

I would have much rather seen Apple go into a new direction for wearable digital sensors in a different vehicle for those technology compared to a watch. Many in the current generation do not even wear watches anymore since one can read the time on their phone.

Just my opinion and $0.02.
 
For me, the idea of smart watches is not a revolutionary idea and falls into the making everything "smart" mentality.

I would have much rather seen Apple go into a new direction for wearable digital sensors in a different vehicle for those technology compared to a watch. Many in the current generation do not even wear watches anymore since one can read the time on their phone.

Just my opinion and $0.02.

Apple didn't design it for the technology. Primarily the Apple Watch is basically just Apple fashion, and a smart watch second.

Tim Cook was asked about a watch. He said it was difficult because your phone is a watch. So he knows the phone can do everything already.
 
Under pressure? Can't wait to see what the iphone 7 looks like. This iphone 6 is poor. It's literally just a big iphone 5 with bumped up specs. Apple is really loosing it's mind here. I'll still be purchasing the iPhone 6 Friday but we need a Truly revolutionary phone now. Furthermore, a watch that does everything my phone does but starts at $349? Are you crazy? Again, I'll be buying the product as a collection but that's just ridiculous.

I am 100% positive you have never seen an iPhone 5.
 
Under pressure? Can't wait to see what the iphone 7 looks like. This iphone 6 is poor. It's literally just a big iphone 5 with bumped up specs. A.

You are such a troll. My ***** iPhone 5 don't have good camera even compared to 5S, no Touch ID, no NFC, no co-processor for fitness apps and can't ever use Apple Pay. iPhone 6 is a huge upgrade to iPhone 5. That's why it's sold out everywhere and back ordered until Oct. Continue to troll as much as you want. At least Apple make things useful in every update, not gimmicks like Android devices.
BTW, smartphone is mature now. You won't see much different from one to another upgrade. Just like laptop in the last 10 years.
 
People who want to show off to their friends and have $400 to blow on notifications for their wrists will buy one.

I have blown off way more money for my Omega and Tag Heuer watches.

Actually the apple watch does exactly what I was looking for - an iPod that I can use with a Bluetooth headset without wires for running. That's what I hoped for Apple would release and they did. And I do not need GPS tracking as I know where I did run...
 
That is the Moto 360 with ios photoshopped on top. It does look pretty amazing. A circular watch seems to compliment the iOS watch interface much better than a rectangular one.

Too bad there are no circle screens. Especially the moto 360. It's display is an abortion.
 
Now, you know the Apple Watch 2 is going to be one of the thinnest watches in the world. Apple is obsessed with thinness. I'm surprised the Watch isn't thinner, but then again, Apple needs to give us a reason to upgrade to the Watch 2. Lol.
I'm holding out for the 5.5-inch Apple Watch so that my Android friends won't make fun of me.
 
Scott was a arrogant prick and his design was good at the beginning but awful after iPhone 4. He needed to go. The world is flat now.

I said Steve didn't know about design, not Scott. Scott just made everything skewmorphic


FACT: The world is spherical.

SUBJECTIVE: Steve, Scott, and Ive "knowing" design.
 
I have blown off way more money for my Omega and Tag Heuer watches.

Actually the apple watch does exactly what I was looking for - an iPod that I can use with a Bluetooth headset without wires for running. That's what I hoped for Apple would release and they did. And I do not need GPS tracking as I know where I did run...

My wife has an iPod nano. Does just as well.

Sony has a really nice sports walkman. You can even go under water with them and listen to the radio and all your MP3s. It sounds crystal clear under water. Try doing that with an apple watch.

There are so many other better choices out there for a lot less if you just want to listen to music during a workout.

Most people can't blow $1,000 on a Tag Heuer watch. But you are the sort of person apple is aiming at. They know you'll buy it. Because you blow $1,000 on a stupid watch anyway.
 
Since development began three years ago, Steve Jobs was no longer around to oversee the development, but he was around when decisions were being made to define their goals and start the development. We can only speculate whether the :apple: Watch would have turned out differently with his direct involvement during development.

Sure, if we're into living in the past.
 
Don't get me wrong, the tech is great inside it (though not for me yet. Pebble has a longer battery life and that's on top of my most-wanted feature list on a smart watch) and I don't dislike what it's trying to do.

As long as they are making a "Sport Watch" that I can not swim or even shower with and have to pray that the battery lasts a day..... I will not buy that thing for $100.-, What good is it?
 
On one hand you have people saying the watch is too bulky; on the other hand people are complaining it can't function without an iPhone. You can't put into it a cell antenna, GPS antenna, etc., a battery to power it all for 168 hours, and have it still be small. Unfortunately we don't have the ability to create pocket universes yet.

1. Small and Thin
2. Long-Lasting Battery
3. Stand-Alone

Pick two.

I think the debates about thinness and ram on this site have told us that most people don't understand product engineering is about balancing compromises.
 
...and they show no example of the cutoff text.
I can see text getting cutoff near the top/bottom but once the text past the top/bottom, you would think all text is viewable.

See text cutoff near the top/bottom is like getting a preview before you see the entire text.

Not just text that is scrollable.

moto360heartrate-2.png
 
it's bulky, Steve wouldn't like that.

Looks smaller than my Garmin Forerunner 405 (these are not my pictures but they are pictures of Garmin GPS watches that I have owned in the past or do currently own/use daily for running). I might decide to buy an Apple Watch to replace my 6 yr old 405. I may wait until the Apple Watch 2 comes out though before spending that kind of money.

Garmin Forerunner 405 pictures.
garmin-405.jpg


IMG_5048.JPG


IMG_5042.JPG


Next to the Forerunner 305 that I had before the 405 (305 was stolen from my car).
garmin-forerunner-405-in-depth-review-60-thumb.jpg
 
People should re-watch the keynote. Huge cheers and standing ovation from some of the Apple employees in the crowd. Bob Mansfield was in the front row for this event. Do people really think someone like Bob Mansfield would come out of planned retirement to work on a dud, to work on something he didn't believe in? And how can anyone dismiss the technology in this product when we know very little about it? I'm fascinated to know more about the S1 chip that powers this thing.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.