You mean like giving a laptop one port and then selling tons of adapters. Then again the new MacBook is only good for emails and the internet, and watching videos. Hmm a tablet can do that for a LOT less...
The innovation was creating a fanless MacBook logic board design
Thunderbolt is intel technology, Apple did not make it or give it to anyone. The thunderbolt connector is based on the Mini DP standard which means displayport devices work when plugged into a thunderbolt port.
Fair enough. But it should be priced around $999.I think the idea is that people will store and share everything through iCloud and other online services like DropBox. Doing that means you don't need adapters for external drives and such. This is basically a netbook in my opinion and not meant to be a workhorse. A computer for people who could get by on an iPad but want to the feel of a normal laptop (Keyboard, etc).
I'm pretty sure Apple helped develop it.
http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thunderbolt_(interface)#Description
A computer, like almost almost all products, is teamwork, Apple couldn't design and offer this MB without Intel producing those processors. There are other ultrabook designs out there with the same processor that do have a fan. So, merely putting this processor into any laptop won't allow that laptop to go fanless, the motherboard and case design needs to be able to act as a good enough heatsink (Apple using aluminium cases very likely helps or might even be crucial).Oh, I thought that was because Intel made the low power cool running low wattage chip.
So it was Apple that did it yes?
I see.
So when Microsoft use the same Intel chip for a fanless design, it will be Microsoft who created it. Yes?
That is part of the commercial genius of Apple. They don't price stuff where most people are happy, they price stuff where it maximises their profits.Fair enough. But it should be priced around $999.
They could only create a workaround for the current Macs with two TB connectors. That excludes the 13" non-retina MBP and two MBAs. And it would exclude the wished-for MBA with retina screen (ie, the current MBAs upgraded with retina screens keeping their existing ports).Most likely not but it would be possible if Apple wanted too. If Dell could make a work around, I'm sure Apple could. 5K will most likely have to wait for Thunderbolt 3.
Just so you know, running OS X to just check your email is an idiotic argument.
Stand is open source not proprietary.
Well, because it still is a "Universal Serial Bus".
Apple may well have been a major force behind the adoption of USB C standard, it doesn't mean it is proprietary. They don't own USB C. It's not like Lightning where you need to pay a fee to Apple to make an accessory.
I always love it when people claim exclusive meaning(s) for a certain word. In practice, the meaning of a given word is whatever it is used for with some minimum frequency. This gets particular entertaining when excluding the use of a certain word for some function or physical object is done for the mere purpose of making this function or object appear in a better light. It doesn't make squat difference for usability whether an object is called dongle or adapter.Adapting the signal to Ethernet and Display methods is changing a hardware function, not unlocking additional software features. Display features are NOT locked. Is there software installed on a mini-display port to VGA adaptor? No. True dongles unlock SOFTWARE features, like license protection does. Physical dongles let people use highly regulated software without having to get use authorization over the internet. But I erased what I said before because there is too much confusion about things. It WOULD be nice if people distinguished between the two so other people knew what they were talking about.
Dongles also almost always just plug into the computer and they don't pass a signal through or have a second thing physically attached to them. But it's confusing because bluetooth adapters are usually called "dongles" because they just plug in and nothing physically attaches to them to transfer a signal but they ARE transferring a signal wirelessly. They aren't unlocking a service because the bluetooth services isn't locked to begin with. So, really, it's a bluetooth adapter, not dongle.
Yes, but I thought thunderbolt was also open? I've seen Surface uses it, but that's about it.
----------
They also made Thunderbolt open, and look how well that turned out.
It can give insight into Apple's internal planning in regard to technologies it wants to use. If Apple 'invented' it, it could indicate that they thought alternatives to TB earlier then we previously might have assumed.LOL, does it really matter who invented it? Seriously!!
Tablets are no good for programming, word processing, note taking, spreadsheets, or certain kinds of games, and they're not as good for web browsing. I mean, you CAN do all that if you really try, but at that point, you're working for the machine, not the other way around. I'd much rather have the MacBook.
I always love it when people claim exclusive meaning(s) for a certain word. In practice, the meaning of a given word is whatever it is used for with some minimum frequency. This gets particular entertaining when excluding the use of a certain word for some function or physical object is done for the mere purpose of making this function or object appear in a better light. It doesn't make squat difference for usability whether an object is called dongle or adapter.
Coming back to the word dongle. In computer terms it is used for stuff that is added and (usually) sticks out. USB memory sticks, if they serve as storage devices only, are normally not called dongles. Its origin might be the verb dangle, something that is attached but is flexible or at least is flexible at its attachment point. Merriam-Webster defines it as:
- a small device that plugs into a computer and serves as an adapter OR as a security measure to enable the use of certain software
Wikipedia concurs and includes adaptors as things the term dongle is used for.
Besides security and adaptors, it is also commonly used for stuff like wireless modems.
But we all know that needing a headphone adaptor would have been ridiculed with equal measure (that doesn't necessarily mean that it would not have been a good idea, just that whenever there is something people can complain about, they will complain about).The MacBook would still be an infinitely better machine with a second USB-C, though (I'd have dropped the headphone port and sold a USB-C to headphone dongle).
The intention of the EU was to reduce the number of chargers landing up in landfills (or incinerators). Already decoupling the charger from the charging cable reduces the amount of material (and valuable metals) potentially ending up as waste by a very large amount. Thus Apple's chargers already fulfilled the EUs target to a large degree.I think the EU regs specify micro-USB (and now we're seeing why that was a stupid idea vs. just mandating a USB-A connector on the wall-wart so that the power supplies were universal). They're more likely to revise the spec to allow USB-C than Lightning)
Where first refers as used on a computer (not a tablet). It is not coincidence that Apple announced their computer a few hours before Google announced theirs. Google gave Apple that spot for some reason, which could very well be that Apple was one of the leading people behind USB-C.Just going to leave this here in case no one actually watched the keynote... John Gruber who?
"The technology behind this is a brand new standard called USB-C, and Apple along with a number of other companies have all worked together to create this new industry standard. And you're going to see it appear in more products. But first you see it here, on the new Macbook." - Phil Schiller.
But once you add other innovations like water-free alcohol, the savings can add up to something noticeable.I agree. You won't feel that weight difference, especially slung over your shoulder.
Which is why you would never say anything publicly that cannot be verified, even if some people would interested in here it.the guy should know when there is absolutely nothing to be gained by releasing info that cant be verified.
I'd say there is a correlation between (1) using your laptop away from your desk, (2) only having a charging cable plugged in and (3) the likelihood of the charging cable being in a location where people trip over.Hmmm. So people trip over their MagSafe cable saving their laptop, but never seem to trip over a USB, DVI, FireWire, Thunderbolt.....hmmm. Quite a mystery.
Tablets are no good for programming, word processing, note taking, spreadsheets, or certain kinds of games, and they're not as good for web browsing. I mean, you CAN do all that if you really try, but at that point, you're working for the machine, not the other way around. I'd much rather have the MacBook.
I think the idea is that people will store and share everything through iCloud and other online services like DropBox. Doing that means you don't need adapters for external drives and such. This is basically a netbook in my opinion and not meant to be a workhorse. A computer for people who could get by on an iPad but want to the feel of a normal laptop (Keyboard, etc).
Where first refers as used on a computer (not a tablet). It is not coincidence that Apple announced their computer a few hours before Google announced theirs. Google gave Apple that spot for some reason, which could very well be that Apple was one of the leading people behind USB-C.
Did they say that? Do you have a link?
Where's that information coming from?
There have been computer with USB type C for over 2 months, Apple was not the first.
Not the first USB-C Product(Nokia), not the first USB-C computer(MSI), And not the first USB-C Laptop available (Chromebook).
That is part of the commercial genius of Apple. They don't price stuff where most people are happy, they price stuff where it maximises their profits.