I'd prefer if he was not involved in software design. Stick to hardware Jony.
Me too, UI has taken a usability down-turn under him. Especially iOS.
I'd prefer if he was not involved in software design. Stick to hardware Jony.
I use to think Steve had assembled a passionate team who cared almost as much as he did about making great products, but that's clearly not the case. They probably couldn't wait to get rid of him so they could scrap of all Apple values and take the company in their own direction. Either that or they're just useless at their jobs. They took a company that had the best software, hardware and UI of the entire industry and they've managed to undo everything within just a few years. Just goes to show you what a difference one person can make.
Alan Dye really is the one to blame for iOS 7. Look at some of his designs from 2009:![]()
This leads me to believe that Jony Ive actually didn't any responsibility for the icon designs.
Found here:http://www.wired.com/2009/11/st_thompson_startups/
Also note that Apple's page says Dye worked on iOS 7, iOS 8 and watchOS. Not OS X. That may explain why OS X didn't get too strictly minimal and kept some of its soul after Yosemite.
Apple senior executive Jonathan Ive has officially assumed the role of "Chief Design Officer" at Apple effective today, after being promoted from his previous role of "Senior Vice President of Design" nearly six weeks ago. Apple has updated Ive's executive profile on its leadership website to reflect the design chief's new position as Apple's third active C-level executive alongside CEO Tim Cook and CFO Luca Maestri.
![]()
Apple announced in a company-wide email last month that Ive would be promoted to Chief Design Officer on July 1 and turn over his day-to-day management of the company's design teams to Richard Howarth and Alan Dye, who have both been elevated to vice president positions. Ive will remain responsible for all of Apple's design, with a focus on redesigning Apple Stores and other larger projects.Apple has also added executive profile pages for design vice presidents Howarth and Dye.
![]()
Ive spoke with The Telegraph journalist Stephen Fry last month about his decision to relinquish some of his control, stating that he is still in charge of Apple's design departments without needing to focus on administrative and management work, responsibilities that will now fall under his lieutenants Howarth and Dye. The move had been widely expected for several years.Ive has been a full-time Apple employee since 1992, and rumors about him scaling back at the company have gained momentum over the years. Ive in the past has expressed his desire to spend more time in his native England, where he grew up, and his promotion will enable him to travel more often and possibly work remotely at times. Ive and his family currently live in an upscale neighborhood in San Francisco.
Article Link: Jony Ive Officially Takes 'Chief Design Officer' Title at Apple
OK, Congrats!
Now that that is settled, could we please have a new official portrait that depicts Mr. Ive not looking as though he is in pain, or is a smirking juvenile.
This wasn't a sarcasm?
2 hand agree @Lets face the truth guys. Jony Ive is a worse designer without Steve Jobs. If Steve would be still around there is NO WAY this would be presented on the stage.
![]()
![]()
![]()
A face begging for a pie.
Apple senior executive Jonathan Ive has officially assumed the role of "Chief Design Officer" at Apple effective today, after being promoted from his previous role of "Senior Vice President of Design" nearly six weeks ago. Apple has updated Ive's executive profile on its leadership website to reflect the design chief's new position as Apple's third active C-level executive alongside CEO Tim Cook and CFO Luca Maestri.
![]()
Apple announced in a company-wide email last month that Ive would be promoted to Chief Design Officer on July 1 and turn over his day-to-day management of the company's design teams to Richard Howarth and Alan Dye, who have both been elevated to vice president positions. Ive will remain responsible for all of Apple's design, with a focus on redesigning Apple Stores and other larger projects.Apple has also added executive profile pages for design vice presidents Howarth and Dye.
![]()
Ive spoke with The Telegraph journalist Stephen Fry last month about his decision to relinquish some of his control, stating that he is still in charge of Apple's design departments without needing to focus on administrative and management work, responsibilities that will now fall under his lieutenants Howarth and Dye. The move had been widely expected for several years.Ive has been a full-time Apple employee since 1992, and rumors about him scaling back at the company have gained momentum over the years. Ive in the past has expressed his desire to spend more time in his native England, where he grew up, and his promotion will enable him to travel more often and possibly work remotely at times. Ive and his family currently live in an upscale neighborhood in San Francisco.
Article Link: Jony Ive Officially Takes 'Chief Design Officer' Title at Apple
Rule #1 for moving up in Design at Apple - you aren't allowed to shave
Rule #2, you can't grow a beard
If the result of hiring and promotion is a not very diverse group, maybe it wasn't pure meritocracy guiding it?Meritocracy should be the only criteria for hiring and promotion. And as far as that statement by Tim Cook... well, it's the sort of crap that you come up when the politically correct gangsters put a gun to your head. Those shakedown artists need to disappear.
Except that shake to undo was introduced under the supposedly very computer scientist Scott Forstall.I find it telling that the new VP of User Interface design has a background in Communication Design and Packaging, a fundamentally different type of background then the type of computer scientsists they had doing this type of work before (see Jef Raskin, Bill Atkinson, Scott Forstall, ...). Usability testing is something quite different then minimalistic design, and I fear this guy's instincts will push the balance between usability and simplicity too far towards the latter.
Already today, Apple's software is full of "secret" features which lead to a clean interface but require the user to known some random gesture to trigger a key feature because they didn't want to pollute the screen with it (I'm looking at you, "shake to undo").
Except you forget. (Deliberately?), What Ive is doing is like a football manager. He takes talent and chooses the best and makes it work well together. If you think that he by his own hand is the best designer you're dreaming.
You mean that if you stop paying for Apple Music you won't be able to play the music downloaded from the cloud anymore, the same way you couldn't download your music anymore when you stopped paying for iTunes Match?What Apple needs is a Chief Quality Officer. One who reports directly to Tim Cook, with no dotted-line reporting to anyone else. So this type of **** doesn't continue to happen:
http://www.mcelhearn.com/the-real-difference-between-itunes-match-and-icloud-music-library-drm/
Nice feature that it is.Except that shake to undo was introduced under the supposedly very computer scientist Scott Forstall.
And that is the exact reason for this appointment. He wants and needs more time to devote to design.
In addition we should not assume that he is the only person drawing pictures at Apple and that some of the things that we see on the devices are a compromise between aesthetics and technical requirements.
And to get back to your initial statement about Jobs: with the size that Apple has grown to now, he would have no time to discuss little bands on a phone either. It shows quite an amount of misunderstanding how a business works, when you demand a CEO to curate design decisions and simultanrously criticise the appointment of a design executive to a position where he can devote more time to do exactly that curation of design.
Sure they would. Nothing really wrong with it.…and hardware. No good designer would have deliberately left that camera like that.