They will implode also, chain reaction.Samsung doesn't need Apple.
They will implode also, chain reaction.Samsung doesn't need Apple.
They will implode also, chain reaction.
"After time, however, many customers usually learn to adapt. Google even removed the headphone jack on the Pixel 2 this year."
Forcing your customers to adapt rather than meeting and exceeding their needs is policy that leads to failure. Ive's attitude always strikes me as arrogant.
FaceID across the board, probably not just next year but years to come. That's why it baffles me why add TouchID on a MacBook when you know you already have this tech in-house? Why not just wait till it's featured THEN introduce it to all your product line that can be accessed securely via FaceID (iPhone, iPad, MacBook)?
Their household appliances are exploding , and if Apple loses Samsung loses. Their mobile phone division is still trying to recoup 8 billion in losses.Samsung has their household aplianfee, PC components, display division etc etc to fall back on.
Their household appliances are exploding , and if Apple loses Samsung loses. Their mobile phone division is still trying to recoup 8 billion in losses.
You like your square corner content being cutoff by the curves?
Notch iconic? It's been out for 2 weeks
I'm saying that I don't agree nor disagree, it could be done either way. But considering Apple has used widgets going way, way back you'd expect they'd have leveraged them. Regardless, they absolutely had to have tried them and did not like them.
[doublepost=1510920803][/doublepost]
And yet Apple is heading up to 1 trillion dollars despite the bevy of naysayers that Tim Cook will drive Apple into the ground. As far as your Samsung appliances you can search yourself for recall information in the us government websites. You are lucky your Samsung appliances haven’t exploded; I have all LG appliances.And yet they haven't folded and are the most profitable manufacturer on Android. Amazing eh?
None of my Samsung appliances have exploded though and I own a lot of em
Like getting rid of magsafe?...Like turning something OFF but it's not really off but on?![]()
They will implode also, chain reaction.
Samsung has their household aplianfee, PC components, display division etc etc to fall back on.
nonsense. the X is an amazing selling with off the charts numbers. the notion that it’s not is just hater fantasy narrative.Apple PR machine out in full force today. Wonder if the waning sales of the iPhone X are a cause.
To big to fail? If anything in the last few years should be lessons learned, there is no “too big to fail”.Implode? Not likely. Samsung is far too big for that to occur.
(SAMSUNG)
To big to fail? If anything in the last few years should be lessons learned, there is no “too big to fail”.
Well the same applies to Apple. If sales went to zero tomorrow, Apple could still be in business for 10+ years. However while highly unlikely either company would fail, it’s not outstanding any realm of possiblility a catastrophe could befall Samsung and they could be out of business.If you looked t the link you would see what I mean. Samsung is far to diverse to fail as a company. A division could take a hit. The company itself? No.
iPad mini 4 in the lineup is probably to get rid of the rest of the stock. Someone who has a Plus or X probably wouldn’t want the mini.
That doesn't make any sense. You could just as easily say someone who has the iPhone 4.7" probably wouldn't want the Plus. Someone who has a 21" display probably wouldn't want a 24" display. Someone who has a 5 seat SUV probably wouldn't want an 8 seat SUV. All statements are equally devoid of reason.
Well the same applies to Apple. If sales went to zero tomorrow, Apple could still be in business for 10+ years. However while highly unlikely either company would fail, it’s not outstanding any realm of possiblility a catastrophe could befall Samsung and they could be out of business.
Being diverse does not guarantee catastrophe. is it possible for Apple or Samsung or both to go out of business; the answer is yes. Probable? No.Yes and no. Apple would survive for a while based on cash reserves and licensing.
Samsung on the other hand is too diverse.
Products: Apparel, chemicals, consumer electronics, electronic components, medical equipment, semiconductors, solid state drives, DRAM, ships, telecommunications equipment, home appliances
Services: Advertising, construction, entertainment, financial services, hospitality, information and communications technology, medical and health care services, retail, shipbuilding
Samsung has a global diversity that Apple cannot match.
It’s kind of complicated. You’re not turning off WiFi, your disconnecting from the access point. When the blue icon goes grey, the text at the top says “disconnected from blah blah”.
It will probably take 4 or 5 years for people to understand this, but then they’ll probably stop complaining about it.
Exactly. Apple does what they do... because they can.It's certainly worked for Apple in the past.
Removed floppy from the original iMac in 1998. People claimed it'd kill it but it was the product that brought Apple back from the brink of failure.
Put USB on iMac. People claimed it was a horridly stupid move but it ended up being the catalyst for the entire market that later moved to USB, thanks largely to the popularity of the iMac which drove peripheral makers to adopt USB.
Removed DVD-ROM from laptops and desktops. Again people claimed it'd kill them and again it worked just fine.
Removed headphone jack. People went crazy but over a year later it seems nearly everyone is perfectly fine with it and most haven't been impacted by the lack of a headphone jack.
I actually like the new way, because usually I’m just wanting to disconnect from a slow access point, I’d rather use LTE for the moment. The old way, I’d have to remember to turn WiFi back on.sorry. i understand. but its not what want. its silly. not this way. wrong way. apple should perhaps implement force touch for different states.
Well yes they do. We’re not talking'nearly edge to edge'
Pretty funny. Other manufacturers have been making phones with edge-to-edge displays for years, yet Apple gets respect for almost getting there.
Not incorrect at all. Look at their lineup now. Why refresh a product that isn’t selling as much? The mini had never sold in droves like it’s bigger brother. Same goes with the iPod Touch.I interpreted his statement as in: wanting to purchase with their money, given that they already have a large phone. Or is that incorrect?
Let's see. Hypothetically, let's iPhone sales went to 0. What's Apple's fall back?Being diverse does not guarantee catastrophe. is it possible for Apple or Samsung or both to go out of business; the answer is yes. Probable? No.