So if camera manufactures can pack >18M pixels in an ares the size of my fingernail, Apple should be able to pack 3M pixels in a 9" area.
Oooof.
So if camera manufactures can pack >18M pixels in an ares the size of my fingernail, Apple should be able to pack 3M pixels in a 9" area.
Not the same thing, is it? Cameras just have digital sensors that send the image data to files on the memory card. They don't have to display perfect pictures at that resolution for the human eye to see.
The 18MP image that is stored on the memory card has to be perfect. You may not be aware of the complexity of the circuitry that captures the image. But if the raw data is bad, it looks bad on all displays. Plus many images are zoomed and cropped. So even a single bad pixel out of 18M will be very visible and color inaccuracies are very noticeable.
Hopefully from all this, Apple realizes the defects in their screens, even though to the regular consumer it's unnoticeable they shouldn't be "sneaking" this past us
Played around with the iPad more today - at least for me it's definitely not a white point issue. My iPad seems slightly pink or slightly green depending on the angle
Obviously, all TFT screens vary in colour balance/saturation depending on the angle you view them at.
Consider the iPad in this regard: It can be looked at straight-on, but more frequently it's held at a slight 15-30 degree angle to the line of sight. Think about the Smart Cover -- this is designed to place the iPad at this kind of angle when it's on a surface.
With the iPad I returned right at the beginning of this thread the pinkish/rosy tint to whites actually went away if I used it at a 15-30 degree angle. It was only visible when the iPad was viewed straight-on.
So, I wonder if quality control dictates that iPads are only supposed to have perfect white balance at saturation if viewed at this slight angle. I doubt it, but I thought I'd put it out there as a theory.
Sounds to me like it was fine and you should of just kept it... at best you will buy again in a few months time and be lucky to end up with something similar to what you previously had, most likely you will encounter screens that are not uniform in tint, have dark patches, yellowing or dust etc, in the mean time everyone else is getting on with life and enjoying their iPad. Once you get into the returns game, expect to go through many iPads all with different quirks or problems of their own, and seeing as you have returned once, you will most likely return again even more easily than before as you set yourself a higher bar for acceptance each time...
Keep these posts coming eventually apple will have to reply to Screengate! What is going on? I think apple employees don't admit to much unless it's official, or worse utterly disinterested when I returned mine and pointed out the thousands of posts online.
It's unprecedented for a screen to be so hit and miss with apple, all my other devices have been perfect.
This is a long thread, I know, but I already mentioned myself all these issues, and said that the whole point of making the return was that I'm prepared to take this risk. Personally I think the next one I get will probably be the same, or slightly better. Let's wait and see what happens when the new screen manufacturers come online mainstream.
I like the iPad but I don't need it. It pushed aside my Macbook Pro while I had it, but now it's gone I can do the same stuff in the same locations with my Macbook. I just have something heavier to lug around!
----------
None of the sane people here expect Apple to be reading any of this. We're discussing and sharing our experiences as part of a community of like-minded people. I don't know how one officially complains to Apple. I'll do some research now.
Fair enough. I guess if you plan to buy 5 like you said you will accelerate the whole process. But if you do end up with basically the same as you had oringially deciding that that is indeed the best it will have all been for nothing.
I went into the regent street store and they had some with different tints, so some slightly pink and some which looked white, but we all know they could have been yellow or had multiple tinted patches and you can't tell under those lights... The main thing I noticed was the iPad 2 was a lot brighter in terms of LED strength than the new iPad, but I have heard the new iPad requires 2.5 times the power to light the retina screen, so it doesn't seem surprising when you think of it like that.
I think the main thing to aim for is a uniform screen... When I had my numerous iMacs all I wanted was a uniform screen, be it a blue tint or slightly pink tint, what killed it for me was when one half of the screen was pink and the other was blue... I would add that colours looked better when viewing them in the pink areas, the blue areas made them looked washed out and not as vibrant, but yes whites did look more white in the blue tinted areas... I do hope apple give us some kind of colour control in the next release of OS on the ipad... You also should remember IPS is different to what you may be used to and things like viewing angles are different and you do have things like colour shift and even IPS glow on large monitors... This is not a fault but a fact of life with the technology...
Does anyone know the process if you return in say 11 months time and get a refurb and the refurb is no good, can you keep returning refurbs or is it a one time swap and you have to live with it?
At max brightness, my new iPad is a lot brighter than my iPad 2 when displaying a white page. At min brightness, the new iPad is actually even darker which helps with nighttime reading without bothering my girl.
Notmsure though if that's what most people see. Perhaps my iPad 2 is just dimmer thsn most, I never noticed the difference.
Fair enough. I guess if you plan to buy 5 like you said you will accelerate the whole process. But if you do end up with basically the same as you had oringially deciding that that is indeed the best it will have all been for nothing.
I think the main thing to aim for is a uniform screen... When I had my numerous iMacs all I wanted was a uniform screen, be it a blue tint or slightly pink tint, what killed it for me was when one half of the screen was pink and the other was blue... I would add that colours looked better when viewing them in the pink areas, the blue areas made them looked washed out and not as vibrant, but yes whites did look more white in the blue tinted areas...
Does anyone know the process if you return in say 11 months time and get a refurb and the refurb is no good, can you keep returning refurbs or is it a one time swap and you have to live with it?
Obviously, all TFT screens vary in colour balance/saturation depending on the angle you view them at.
Consider the iPad in this regard: It can be looked at straight-on, but more frequently it's held at a slight 15-30 degree angle to the line of sight. Think about the Smart Cover -- this is designed to place the iPad at this kind of angle when it's on a surface.
With the iPad I returned right at the beginning of this thread the pinkish/rosy tint to whites actually went away if I used it at a 15-30 degree angle. It was only visible when the iPad was viewed straight-on.
So, I wonder if quality control dictates that iPads are only supposed to have perfect white balance at saturation if viewed at this slight angle. I doubt it, but I thought I'd put it out there as a theory.
iPad = IPS, not TFT
You are getting a premium screen as a premium price.
http://www.macworld.com/article/1146028/inplaneswitching.html
That would mean your new iPad is INSANELY bright then, because the iPad 2's i have seen are very very bright when on max.
Yes, you're getting a premium screen as a premium price. Name one other than iPad that has 9.7inch screen with that resolution. NONE.
It's no perfect as a new technology, but that doesn't make it a cheap tech. Frankly, it's not bad at all in normal light situation.
Obviously, all TFT screens vary in colour balance/saturation depending on the angle you view them at.
Consider the iPad in this regard: It can be looked at straight-on, but more frequently it's held at a slight 15-30 degree angle to the line of sight. Think about the Smart Cover -- this is designed to place the iPad at this kind of angle when it's on a surface.
With the iPad I returned right at the beginning of this thread the pinkish/rosy tint to whites actually went away if I used it at a 15-30 degree angle. It was only visible when the iPad was viewed straight-on.
So, I wonder if quality control dictates that iPads are only supposed to have perfect white balance at saturation if viewed at this slight angle. I doubt it, but I thought I'd put it out there as a theory.
iPad = IPS, not TFT
You are getting a premium screen as a premium price.
http://www.macworld.com/article/1146028/inplaneswitching.html
From posts I've read, I don't think people vote down people just because they return due to color that is obviously off; they do so either because either they claim b/c their iPad was off there must be a systematic defect in most iPads or that everyone else claiming they have a good screen is merely willing to accept garbage.
The iPad is not inexpensive, but in a way that a BMW > Chevrolet. But it seems a lot of people barking about screen quality are looking for Rolls Royce quality at a BMW price. (BMW owns Rolls BTW so it's not about the company). But the cost to produce a flawless component of impeccable quality, as is what Rolls orders is exponentially more expensive than the cost to produce a nearly flawless, "lower quality" material that goes into a BMW.
The same is true of Apple. It makes great products like BMW, but not Rolls. There will be flaws - even large batches, but Apple always makes good on those units that make it into the wild as long as the consumer doesn't expect 100% flawless. That's not going to happen in a mass produced consumer good. That is when people get voted down from what I'v read.