love my airpods. sure, the built quality could be better - the seam between the two halves of each airpod became pretty visible after the first half hour of usage - i‘m also able to feel it with my fingernail. plus the magnets in the case attract tiny metal particles in my pocket up to the point that they’re so stuck, you can‘t get rid of them anymore without scratching them off. i guess that‘s unavoidable but could be mitigated with darker colors.
some additional interface (e.g. triple tap) would be nice, especially for people who don‘t own an apple watch. sometimes i wish, siri would at least understand „volume up“ without an internet connection. the case could also have a bit more grip imho, it already slipped out of my pocket a few times. and, maybe future airpods could use both microphones at the same time for even better sound. oh, and water resistance would be nice. and better sound-quality than bluetooth of course, but that goes without saying.
still they are quite great. staying secure in my ear (but i wouldn‘t dare wear them while snowboarding), great battery life, nice charging case, switching between apple devices without disconnecting and repairing (although it could be faster) and just the freedom of not having a cable.
now they just have to not break or get lost for at least three years to justify the rather high price tag (unlike my powerbeats where the plastic of one earpiece broke after a year).
[doublepost=1512424851][/doublepost]
But they don’t have the W1 chip. The easy switching between Apple devices is the killer feature that I can’t imagine not having. Only having to use one kind of charging cable helps, too.
faster switching, even smaller and lighter, better built quality, better sound quality, different colors, better mics, an additional interface (touch stripe volume or triple-tap), water-proof, better accelerometer to give your iphone/ar device more information about your head and body movements, pulse measuring, body temperature measuring,... imho there’s still some headroom left.
[doublepost=1512425527][/doublepost]
I whish that what you’re saying would also be the case with the HomePod...
yeah, but the homepod is a speaker for audio playback first and foremost, and they already did that in 2006 with the ipod hifi. it‘s probably not going to compete with the echo or google home, because those are not very good speakers, but interfaces to much more capable voice assistants than siri.
it‘s imagineable to put echo dots or home minis in every room of your home at $29 apiece, but only a few rich people will buy more than 1-2 $349 decices that maybe won‘t work with the remote-widget on your phone five years down the line. ( e.g. like the apple-tv 3g )