I was intelligent enough not to even contemplate purchasing one in the first place. Considering this product's pricepoint and claims for what it can do and potentially do, I think updating it after a year with little content released is taking the pee a bit. When you've got iPads, Macs, AirPods and HomePods going multiple years without an update, I think they could offer this with what is supposedly a flagship product. A more positive release would be a mainstream Apple Vision that has a much wider market reach IMO.What do you suggest Apple do instead? Send out consent forms to all the early adopters and ask if they'd mind terribly giving Apple permission to release version 2? If you bought a v1 and are surprised a v2 is on the horizon I would question your intelligence.
But the outer display isn't "see thru". It has cameras to let you see the real world. With out that, it is just a VR ski mask now. Apple was going for spatial computing.Maybe remove the idiotic outside display to reduce cost and weight?
Apple no longer has the appetite for this type of long term investment. Look at the car. If anything the AVP will disappear in a couple of years because it does not make enough quarterly profit. Thank you very much Mr. Cook.I know everyone makes fun of VisionPro (and even the name itself is awful, IMO) but I really hope Apple double down here and just swallow their pride at the muted reception and continue to pour R&D into this and ultimately end up making something truly astonishing in the next five years. And by 'truly astonishing' I mean 'really useful' and technologically mind-blowing.
I don’t think it’s the M2 that is responsible for most of the battery usage on the AVP.Lets hope there's a greatly increased runtime for battery with this M5 vision pro. With each M iteration, I'm more interested in the power efficiency and battery life, especially with a headset.
this is probably true, but this has always been Apple’s strategy. with such a complex and unique product like this I think it was more wise for them to start out super high end and expensive to test the waters / gauge interest.The price of this is ridiculous. It could have been so much more popular and successful.
I agree entirely but hope that this product can be an exception to the rule. Everyone knows what they released was basically a crazy-priced prototype. There is still hope with this I think. Maybe it needs a different Exec in charge.Apple no longer has the appetite for this type of long term investment. Look at the car. If anything the AVP will disappear in a couple of years because it does not make enough quarterly profit. Thank you very much Mr. Cook.
The price isn’t its main problem.The price of this is ridiculous. It could have been so much more popular and successful.
People keep saying this but it’s such a cheap display it can’t even be fraction of the cost and the glass is to dissipate heatMaybe remove the idiotic outside display to reduce cost and weight?
Why does Apple feel increasingly like the Android/Intel/Microsoft that they have mocked for years.That's a big "if", and whether or not that happens will have little to do with whatever CPU Apple uses.
Not on visionOS there aren’t.But now there are alternatives store![]()
Yeah, that never happens with technology.So they've released the first version and charged consumers £3500-£4000, barely released any content for it, and theres now rumours a second version is coming out with updated hardware already?? Sorry what? Talk about hanging their customers out to dry.
“Entering mass production” doesn’t mean launch. Based on the present rumor, I would expect the AVP 2 to launch in January 2026, two years after the first model.Beyond the story with AVP, if an M5 Processor is going to be ready for AVP in Fall 2025- would M5 Max and Ultras be ready sooner for a Mac Studio? It seems a bit odd to release a Mac Studio in Spring 2025 with an M4 Max/Ultra when the M5 would be just around the corner.
Glass has very low thermal conductivity, you don’t use it to dissipate heat.People keep saying this but it’s such a cheap display it can’t even be fraction of the cost and the glass is to dissipate heat
The Quest 3 doesn't deserve that hate, as it is actually quite impressive hardware, and even more impressive if you factor in the price. As much as I'm not a fan of Facebook, my soul did at least provide a pretty good price, though I guess I should have held out another 9 months to get the 512 GB for the same cost 😀.I was close to buying one but then thought that M2 is rather outdated - no ray tracing etc. will be a problem in the future
I think they could lower the price by getting rid of the outer EyeSight display
I now bought the quest 3 512 GB at the new reduced price - having tried AVP I already know I’m going to mostly hate the Quest - it will be just an interim device until 2nd Gen AVP
Very true, although I think the wider market are a bit more tech aware these days and know what they expect, rather than be told what they should expect. Then again with Vision Pro, I don't think Apple aimed it as mainstream consumers.Yeah, that never happens with technology.
Apple introduced the Lisa in 1983 for $9995, which would the equivalent of $31,590 in 2024 dollars. The Macintosh came out a year later at $2495. The Lisa had much more RAM at 1MB, a bigger 12 inch black and white screen, and even a 5MB hard drive, so it certainly isn't a perfect comparison.
But Apple did introduce a Lisa 2 in 1984, as well, for $3495. I believe that $3495 got you a 400KB floppy, 512 KB RAM, a 5 MB hard drive, and that fabulous 12 inch black and white screen, which suddenly makes the $3499 AVP sound not so bad to me when I think back to the 1980s.
I find the Vision Pro as interesting as the polishing cloth. I have no idea where this product is going. I think its price needs to be reduced by 60% to become popular... It also needs a killer feature and more regular features.