Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
They both report directly to Cook so unless your claiming Cook has gone over their advice, a man without the technical qualifications,

Given Cook has an engineering degree and has experience across Apple and IBM, I would say one thing he does not lack is technical qualifications needed to make a final decision.
 
sucks for those who beta tested the buggy keyboard. gonna have to shell out another $1k+ to "replace" it with a new laptop.
 
Yes he did. Here’s the video:

Plus he was the one showing it off to Tim Cook in the hands on area at WWDC.

Everything you wrote is what you want to believe, not what’s going on at Apple.

Ok, I stand corrected on the fact that he did not do a video. He obviously did, but only as a small part of the product video and not standalone as a in previous years.

I still stand by my assertion that he was overruled on the design and did not like it. I'm sure he was told he had to support it. Why can I say this without any other knowledge, because the new Mac Pro is not the Trash Can Mac Pro and puts function over form. Something we know Ive is not good at.
 
Well according to Apple themselves you can claim Ive and Dan Riccio decide what goes into the Mac as that’s their jobs! They both report directly to Cook so unless your claiming Cook has gone over their advice, a man without the technical qualifications, like the report in the WSJ states, then your blaming one man instead of the three it is.

http://www.apple.com/uk/leadership/jonathan-ive/

http://www.apple.com/uk/leadership/dan-riccio/

So you either claim others have the final say, or you just blame Ive for everything, so which is it? You can’t have both ad that literally would make no sense in the argument.
You forgot Jeff Williams who runs operations. He’s responsible for ensuring these products can be made at scale. Are we supposed to believe both Dan Riccio and Jeff Williams knew this keyboard would be defective but signed off on it because Ive said this is the way it has to be? Because Ive is perfectly happy shipping defective products?
 
Ok, I stand corrected on the fact that he did not do a video. He obviously did, but only as a small part of the product video and not standalone as a in previous years.

I still stand by my assertion that he was overruled on the design and did not like it. I'm sure he was told he had to support it. Why can I say this without any other knowledge, because the new Mac Pro is not the Trash Can Mac Pro and puts function over form. Something we know Ive is not good at.
Stand by it if you want but it’s not based on fact. It’s based on your opinion that Ive puts form over function. Anyway there are lots of Apple product videos over the years that have featured more than Ive. And some like iPad 3 and iPhone 4s that didn’t feature him at all.
 
Most likely because they were persuing two solutions in somewhat in parallel. The revised materials solution that recently launched did not require a redesign of the case. Extremely, likely it has the same physical dimensions of the old keyboard subsystem. That means the case doesn't have to be redesigned and all the infrastructure and logistics of getting out a new case.

The report seems to indicate that the new keyboard is only coming to a case that they just finished relatively recently. That case may have been designed with option A or B for the keyboard in the first place. Or that it is such a fresh design that they are not as committed to the "sunk costs" on that case and could iterate on it quickly because they designers had just finished touching it. ( It is extremely hard to believe that all during the development of this new MBA retina case that they did not know that the keyboard had some major FUBAR issues and didn't either didn't have a keyboard A/B plan or an alternative design that got waved off that had a switch back to different keyboard foundation. (The latter waved off on some tap dancing that just a few more tweaks would 'fix' the butterfly problem) . )

That it will take another year to get a revised MBP case(s) out the door ... also not particularly surprising in Apple's limited ability to "walk and chew gum at the same time" in the Mac space. If revising 1-2 Mac models then can't do the others is a repeating pattern over the last 3-4 years. They put the money into an incrementally better keyboard because it will actually probably save them money over the additional year they spend iterating to a better foundation. I suspect the latest iteration is substantially better than the first generation butterfly. However, Apple has taken so long to fix the problems that at this point the whole butteryfly approach is just about as much a public relations (PR) disaster as much as it is a technical problem. Even if fix the technical failure issues it is still won't get over the reputation. ( And frankly being 'too low' in key travel is an issue that Apple didn't put a priority on while the technical failures were more pressing. there are a substantive number of folks who didn't like the travel any; the key failures were only additional gasoline on the fire. )

And it isn't just the keyboard. The whole move to make keyboard replacement drag in many other parts so that the cost is very expensive. It seems doubtful anyone put prudent thought into how that would go over for consumers ( or Apple) over the extended term. [ other than being a hustle for extra dollars. ]




I'm not so sure they "saved" any butterfly R&D costs. This last fix may have been developed 2-3 years ago but didn't make the "Scrooge McDuck" cut of being cost effective enough. So the actual cost is already a sunk cost. That "membrane" fix that came out last year Apple filed a patent for that in 2016. http://pdfaiw.uspto.gov/.aiw?docid=20180068808 . If they filed in 2016 someone was doing the R&D before that ( unless they were just spitballing something quick in 2016 ). They didn't deploy it until 2018; two years later. .

In short, I think Apple had some of this stuff before. They just didn't opt to use it previously.


The stuff that Apple did in 2019 has a good chance of being worked on ( incurring costs ) way back in 2016-7. So perhaps also 2-3 years of making it out the door. Someone may have waved it off because heat , materials , and lower costs weren't the "core problem". (and later the membrane thing would be 'enough' ).

I also don't think Apple took seriously enough the depth and breath of the root cause issues. Until they deploy the extended warrantee for the keyboard that they didn't have a firm grip on the scope of the problem. Once that scope became clear, the PR aspects got clearer. ( Maybe also unexpected number of folks still buying older version of MBA with non butteryfly keyboard also brought some clarity. )
Finally someone with good thinking and not just spitting out nonsense. I agree with what you said. A lot has gone into it. We still don’t know if the 2019’s will have issues or if the new parts fixed what was causing it. I still think the 2019’s are the safest buy for this generation. We’ll see what happens with the new keyboards in the new machines. I don’t expect any new MacBook Pro model this year either.
 
I’m a little bummed that Kuo didn’t mention the 16” MBP rumored for this fall as a candidate for the new keyboard. I’ve had my eye on that one as a replacement for my 2013 original retina MBP for a while. Not sure how much longer I can hold out!
 
  • Like
Reactions: ascender
Given Cook has an engineering degree and has experience across Apple and IBM, I would say one thing he does not lack is technical qualifications needed to make a final decision.

Cooks degree is in Industrial Engineering, that is not related to usability, technology, software, printed circuit boards, electrical design, or chips. It is related to production processes, quality, and cost. One can see that in how he makes decisions.
 
No big deal to me because I have no problem with the butterfly-type keyboard at all. None. Do I like using it as much as the old-style scissors keyboard? No. But I have no problem whatsoever in using the new style.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Totemsflare
This is exactly why I am waiting on the 2021 MacBook Pro instead. Thank goodness I never bought any from this generation. Looks like things are going back to normal, but it’s a shame users who bought this generation had to be beta testers.
 
What is the issue with touchbar? Never encountered any (apart from the initial cost) I love it! Probably its most useful when filling up forms.

Of all the extra stuff the tb-MBP carries compared to the nontb-MBP, the touchbar is the one I'd want the least.

Better thermals yes, faster components yes, touch Id yes, more ports yes. Touchbar? Nah.

Not saying it's useless for everyone, but for me and likely for 90% of use cases.
 
Well, I actually love my butterfly keyboard. So far, I haven't faced any reliability issues (knock on wood) and I honestly prefer typing on it over any other keyboard. I hope the feel isn't too different on the new keyboards.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Totemsflare
There is not a single report of keyboard failure for 2019 versions. I'll take this over a first gen product if you don't mind the keyboard feel.
 
Nice to see Apple finally decided to start with a new design. I wonder if we will ever get the whole story of what the issue or issues were fully -- I wonder if they even entirely figured it out, as they seemed to keep trying different things. Maybe the class-action lawsuits will reveal the actual failure rates.

AppleInsider's coverage of this mentions that the cost of the keyboard was high because it had a higher than average failure rate during manufacturing. Watching that video tear-down of the design, it did seem like it would be difficult to assemble. Maybe Quality Assurance let a lot of iffy assemblies through because of the low-turnout. The article also said Apple went with a new company for assembly.

Having used my 2016 MBP daily for over 30 months, I have to say, I hope I don't have to go back to mushy-feel of the old keyboards... I find the low-travel to be quite productive once I adjusted to it. But it will be nice to put this issue to bed... assuming the new designs are fine...
 
Time for physics to bend people into its will. Good job. Apple has failed to defy physics.
But even so, because of Catalina... I am not sure whether I will buy those MacBooks or not.
 
Back in the day I would have said voice and VR were the future.
Now that I'm in the future I'm thinking we go retro, back to cherry keyboards and matte finish lcd panels.
It was so nice.
 
My initial reaction was elation and that I would buy this new Air, top configuration, on Day 1.

But here’s the problem.

Apple destroyed a lot of trust. Brand eroding trust. Too many years denying it was a problem. Only ‘Impacting a small number of users and most users loved it.’ Too many years claiming to have fixed the problem, even while denying it was a problem.And yet, year after year, they clearly did not fix the problem and kept shipping defective designs at a significant cost premium..

Apple behaved like Zuck and Samberg, knowing one thing, saying another. Even the last releases, where they only spoke on background on keyboard improvements—again, while publicly claiming it was a minor issue and customers loved it—was right out of the Facebook playbook.

This is not Tim Cook’s Apple. He may not be a product guy, but he is one of the few in Silicon Valley with a strong moral compass. He leads Apple with this compass.

But back to lost trust. How do we know this new design is better? Won’t fail? How can we trust Apple’s claims after they were so deceptive for years and years? These are tools we need to make a living. And for students to do schoolwork.

No, I can’t buy a new MacBook on Day 1. Because of Apple’s actions, the loss of brand equity and trust, I will wait a year just to be safe.

(And yes, here’s hoping The touchbar is dead too. Glad Apple tried, but it simply is a terrible idea in practice.)
 
Last edited:
Mind to read the report? The scissors keyboard costs less and that's why Apple is adopting it.

I did thanks and it doesn't say that at all. It says it is believed it will "benefit Apple's profits".

Of course not having to replace top case after top case on thousands of MacBook and MacBook Pro machines has the chance of improving profit.
 
  • Like
Reactions: PC_tech and apolloa
I wonder if we will ever get the whole story of what the issue or issues were fully

Least hypothesis: they tried to make the keyboard thinner and cheaper - they should have picked one (or, preferably, neither) - very short travel needs very tight tolerances, durable materials that won't distort/wear with heat or regular use and aggressive protection against dust. They've had 3 goes at fixing it, so the design (which can't really be separated from the cost of manufacture) is probably fundamentally flawed.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.