What about:
3.5" iPhone Mini to replace the 4s
4.2" iPhone Air to replace the 5s
4.9" iPhone Pro
You do know what "pro" stands for, right?
What about:
3.5" iPhone Mini to replace the 4s
4.2" iPhone Air to replace the 5s
4.9" iPhone Pro
Used an S4 last night. Just terrible. Could not operate it with one hand. Couldn't reach notification center. Nearly dropped it a few times just trying to navigate one handed. I hope Apple keeps it down towards 4.3-4.7. I haven't had a chance to try a Moto X yet.
true.
Besides, how many of you people actually owned a bigger screen phone so you can say "i dont want it because i dont like it". Truthfully i havent met not one person that would say "oh man this screen is too big its just HORRIBLE!". Everybody loves bigger screens wether its a TV or a phone and thats a fact![]()
lol...yes it is
I've always thought that around 4.7" was ideal, especially if they can narrow the bezels around the device. Just make it wider instead of taller. I don't see the point of 16:9 on a phone aside from video, but worse case scenario video is the same size it is now with bars top and bottom.
Same sentiment over and over and over again.
Go back to when all iPhones had 3.5" screens and THAT was "the ONE and ONLY perfect size", "nobody wants a screen any bigger than 3.5", "it's stupid to want any other size", "how could we fit that abomination in our pockets?" (when the actual physical dimensions sometimes differed by only a few millimeters), etc. Even right into the launch of an iPhone with a bigger screen, that sentiment continued to dominate.
Then, Apple went with a bigger screen and bam: "shut up and take my money", "best iPhone ever", etc.
Recall all the Android bashing built upon fragmentation arguments and the monumental burdens for programmers having to support a variety of screen resolutions.
Then, the rumors pick up steam, making it look like Apple is going larger screen so that the vocal majority of "3.5" is the perfect size" start hedging their statements into "wait & see". There was a strong "if then" argument that if Apple dared to increase the screen size, they would maintain the same aspect ratio to avoid "stupid" Android fragmentation and so on.
Apple rolls out a taller but not wider screen resulting in black bars until the "strained" developers could adapt and bam: "shut up and take my money", "best iPhone ever", etc.
Now go through this thread. A chunk are making the same old argument again in support of Apple's current choice of screen size as the one and only "perfect" size. Another segment is showing interest in buying a bigger-screen iPhone only to get bashed about how "stupid" such a desire is because the "as is" as handed down by the Almighty is the ONE and ONLY screen size that anyone should want.
Cue a few posts starting off with "99% of people want" (only what Apple has available for sale right now), "Apple (sometimes the biggest company in the world) can't support having more than a line or two of iPhone models", etc
Then Apple rolls out a bigger screen iPhone in the next round and bam: "Shut up and take my money", "best iPhone ever", "how did we ever get by on screen sizes smaller than this (new) ONE and ONLY best size?", etc. Do we never tire of this circle?
Those happy with the "as is" are unaffected by the "maybe next". If you like what you have, you'll still have it. Those coveting "maybe next" could simply get what they want too. In doing so, they give Apple their money so that "our" favorite company becomes even more prosperous than they already are.
Same sentiment over and over and over again.
Go back to when all iPhones had 3.5" screens and THAT was "the ONE and ONLY perfect size", "nobody wants a screen any bigger than 3.5", "it's stupid to want any other size", "how could we fit that abomination in our pockets?" (when the actual physical dimensions sometimes differed by only a few millimeters), etc. Even right into the launch of an iPhone with a bigger screen, that sentiment continued to dominate.
No.... the bigger screen is NOT needed.
Just because you have tiny girl hands doesn't mean everyone else has.
No.... the bigger screen is NOT needed.
I think the Moto X is the perfect size for a large screened phone... now if we could just put iOS 7 on that phone![]()
Just to educate you here. I work for AT&T as a sales consultant and I listen to customers and yes, most leave apple to android for mainly the screen size.
I feel apple missed the boat this year , they should of came up with 3 sizes of iPhones ... iPhone 5s for Small. iPhone 5m for med screen and 5 L for larger, this way everyone gets what they want. The 5C was a flop , we all know it .
One size phone does not fit every persons needs. .it's like jeans. No bodies are all alike . For anyone here to be that narrow minded to think ONE SIZE PHONE fits all.. it's not good marketing for anyone. Look at HTC/SAMSUNG They have mini a s4 a Note and Mega ... Samsung was smart they went after a area apple lags in but I know the 6 will have a few models . I think there should be 3 .. Just like most.... small , med and large this way everyone is happy
----------
I work for At&t .. Some not all people want larger screens . I work with the public, so you better open your mind. Not everyone is like you .. People have different needs. If you are so narrow minded , you won't get anywhere in life.
Oh shut up and please leave if you only came to troll. These comments don't add anything if they are about Samsung copying Apple or the other way around.I wonder if Samsung will try to sue Apple over copying Samsung's products...
To me it's a foregone conclusion that a larger phone will emerge. I'm more interested in the dimension they will choose. iOS 7's resolution independence opens the door to other options. For a number of reasons (first of which being manufacturing) I honestly don't believe they would take a step back in pixel density as has been suggested so I think 326 remains the number.
The question is, will they return to 3:2 or keep the 16:9? My preference would be a return to 3:2, probably keeping the pixel height close to its current dimension. Photos remains among the most popular of use cases, and going back to 3:2 optimizes for that specific experience.
So just to pick a number, 1140x760, which translates to a ~4.2" screen, or a little less than 3/8" width of the current screen size. Keeps it from becoming too unwieldily for the pocket, and more importantly, for one hand use.
Would be curious to hear others' thoughts specifically on dimension.
No.... the bigger screen is NOT needed.