Apple (or any other company) faces an impossibility of keeping 100% of it's customers happy, 100% of the time. Not going to happen. This board is evidence of that. From all indications though, apple is keeping the right customers happy at this point.If customers are Apple's most important assets, then Apple has an odd way of showing it. Over the last several years, Apple has "courageously" been quite adept at offending a large segment of its customer base.
So in that vein, what does the company name "Apple" have to do with mobile phones? As far as the statement that "Macs go away", I don't want macs to go away, there are three in this household. The entire headphone jack is a non-issue, at least to me.It has changed its focus from Macintosh laptops and desktops to being a luxury mobile device manufacturer, primarily iOS oriented. That this Apple focused forum still calls itself "Macrumors" has become anachronistic. "Applerumors" or "iPhoneTrends" would be more apropos. In reading through posts on this forum it is clear that a substantial number of Apple's current iOS-centric customers would prefer Macs to go away, being disdainful of the general computer line as a whole as being "old fashioned" and out of sync with the times. I mean, good grief, Macs still incorporate old timey headphone jacks.
I too believe that an employer with a top down approach to good employee management reaps a lot of benefit and get's paid back in spades for those efforts. But that has no relationship to that there are always "bad apples" in the bunch. I flat out disagree that an employer who treats employees well has no problems with "loyalty". There are always those who have moral, personal or ethical issues, no matter how well they are treated by their employers, are loose cannons who can be swayed to believe they can do whatever with the information their employer has entrusted to them.I still maintain that a company that treats its employees well will generally have no problem with "loyalty" issues. A trend, since the turn of the century, has been suppression of wages and benefits for workers, resulting in frequent employee turnover, and yes, not so much company loyalty. You get what you pay for in this regard.
The entire piece is an opinion and ends with the "downfall has already started". Based on what? Is that the way one ends an article trying to establish some credibility?I would hardly consider reading that article as proof of the fall of Apple - it's dreadful; poorly written, lots of grammatical and syntax errors etc.. It reads like a fanatical teenager would rant.
Not the ones that violate the law, ethos of the company. But your most important assets are your customers and keeping them good is a job for the most important resource. But good job deflecting.
[doublepost=1523710739][/doublepost]
Except it’s not sinking.
In reading through posts on this forum it is clear that a substantial number of Apple's current iOS-centric customers would prefer Macs to go away, being disdainful of the general computer line as a whole as being "old fashioned" and out of sync with the times. I mean, good grief, Macs still incorporate old timey headphone jacks.
Right, the difference is 60 vs 90 days. It was 73 daysThat’s not getting “technical” at all.There’s a big difference between 2 to 3 months ago and your exact statement: “last month.”
What is the line in the sand for that comment? To me, the apple of today is not "sailing away" from my expectations of quality and care. Could things be better? Surely, but this is not a new thing under Cook, things could always have been better starting from Sculley.Not sinking, just seems to be sailing away from customers’ expectations of quality and care for products (the trade Apple used to be known for)
Right, the difference is 60 vs 90 days. It was 73 days![]()
Right, the difference is 60 vs 90 days. It was 73 days![]()
Oh, I thought I originally said 2 months ago. That’s what I meant to say at least. ApologiesLOL… Thank you for confirming I am correct. I think you must have forgotten what you said. You stated a January rumor came from last month. I pointed out last month wasn’t February. So you’re wrong, and I’m glad you recognized it.![]()
It’s a bit embarrassing for a report to come out that says they’re delaying features to fix performance issues
Apple told employees that leaking information about an unreleased product can impact sales of current models, lead to fewer sales when the product is released, ....
Then why was the Homepod announced officially, far before it was ready for sale? In the words of Apple, did they "get played" by their own hands?Leaked information about a new product can negatively impact sales of the current model; give rival companies more time to begin on a competitive response; and lead to fewer sales of that new product when it arrives.
The irony of this leak
The irony of this leak
The irony of this leak
The touchbar doesn’t appeal to me either. But it makes much more ergonomic sense to build the Touch components into the horizontal part of the notebook. Touch screen notebooks are an ergonomic nightmare.If you know that Apple is going to release a new iPhone in 6 months, will you possibly buy a competing phone that releases before the new iPhone comes out? I am sorry, but this is an ancient way of thinking for an industry leading company. To add to the irony, Apple has been last on everything except for in the category of unneeded and unwanted, like a freaking Touch Bar on a laptop and not a touchscreen.
The flip side is events become boring when all those who would tune in know what’s going to be announced beforehand and nothing is a surprise. Also how many companies are really transparent about their future products? I would argue most aren’t, especially not with consumer products.I feel like Apple benefits from the leaks as well. Since it builds hype to upcoming products without them officially announcing them. If they don’t want leaks, they should be more transparent with their customers and shareholders about there roadmaps.
Imagine you’re the unfortunate soul who loses his job over leaking a memo about leaking.
Oh yes, we can't have leaks building hype, that would be bad..
If customers are Apple's most important assets, then Apple has an odd way of showing it. Over the last several years, Apple has "courageously" been quite adept at offending a large segment of its customer base. It has changed its focus from Macintosh laptops and desktops to being a luxury mobile device manufacturer, primarily iOS oriented. That this Apple focused forum still calls itself "Macrumors" has become anachronistic. "Applerumors" or "iPhoneTrends" would be more apropos. In reading through posts on this forum it is clear that a substantial number of Apple's current iOS-centric customers would prefer Macs to go away, being disdainful of the general computer line as a whole as being "old fashioned" and out of sync with the times. I mean, good grief, Macs still incorporate old timey headphone jacks.
What is the line in the sand for that comment? To me, the apple of today is not "sailing away" from my expectations of quality and care. Could things be better? Surely, but this is not a new thing under Cook, things could always have been better starting from Sculley.
Apple will never be able to please 100% of it's customers, 100% of the time.
There was no legacy Apple product that would lose market share/sales by letting the Speaker’s future release be fully understood. But other competitive products could lose sales by letting the consumer know that there was an Apple speaker option in the pipeline. Very different than the impact of having major leaks about the next iPhone come out 5 months before it hits the market.Then why was the Homepod announced officially, far before it was ready for sale? In the words of Apple, did they "get played" by their own hands?