Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
the gpu will draw around 16W instead of 12W from M1 but 35% increase
I assume that's at load rather than idle? Could you share your source?

(Not doubting you, just curious to better understand the differences)
 
It looks like the majority of the target audience for Airs are better off with the original Air. They won’t benefit much from the M2 since single core performance is what really matters for them, and that’s only 12% faster, but you need at least a 20% increase to see a real world difference.
 
It is a nice improvement and the chip was probably ready for months, most likely issues with the supply stuff. I do hope for a much bigger gain with M3 as Intel’s next step will be big too.
 
Seems like the gains are largely (9% of the 11.6%) GHz related though? That’s great, but suggests little structural improvement in the cores themselves? I ask as it would indicate that further improvements would rely on the 3 nm process to manage power consumption?
To a point yes. Faster clock rating of the CPU will certainly speed things up; however, that also adds more power consumption which is something the M2 is already doing.
 
That is actually insane. If you follow other mainstream CPU. They do not get a 20% increase per generation
Alder lake was more than 20 % over rocket lake. In some instances Intel nearly doubled multithreading performance. Albeit at many watts of power but the 12700k is a good part that doesn't overheat and is very potent in gaming.

AMD Zen 4, Intel raptor lake, and then Intel meteor lake are coming. Then Zen 5 and arrow lake will drop. x86 is not standing pat at all. 2023-24 will be insane years in the cpu wars...

But Apple is doing excellent things. I'm looking forward to Apple 3nm with cores based on a16.
 
Those Max Tech clickbaiters strike again with cherry picking results. If comparing M2 MBP to M1 MBP it's only 9.5% for ST and 14.9% for MT so minor bump credited to TSMC improved 5nm node.

1655317028130.png


1655317044643.png
 
And speakers, display quality and so forth. I upgraded from a M1 MBA to a base 14" MBP not for the CPU but for the GPU, XDR screen and extra ports. The fact the 14" can use two monitors out of the box was a big factor as well.

I already felt the CPU speed of the base M1 MBA was more than good enough for 95% of uses and I edit 4k video, create 3D animation, develop mobile apps, edit raw photography and did graphic design with it.
The speakers were a big upgrade for me going to the 14" as well. It's simply amazing the kind of sound they are able to put out. No other laptop comes close, none of the pc laptops with audio brands slapped on them even compare to the regular 13"!
 
  • Like
Reactions: DeepIn2U
I'm willing to bet one of the most impressive improvements, other than this, will be power efficiency. I'm very curious to see real-world battery life comparisons between the M1 and M2.
It’s most definitely going to be worse. The M2 is physically larger, has more transistors and is clocked higher, whilst using the same 5NM process as M1 series.
 
I'm willing to bet one of the most impressive improvements, other than this, will be power efficiency. I'm very curious to see real-world battery life comparisons between the M1 and M2.
Battery life will be worse than the M1. You will see equal on Apple's webpage due to the fact that Apple increased the battery size to make up for the loss.

Why? The M2 is more power hungry already and that's according to Apple's own keynote graphs.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.