Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Why does the mini need that much juice, it has all of the components of a MacBook - same drives, same processors, but NO DISPLAY. Should work just fine with a 55w supply.

It would be real easy for Apple to come up with a locking tab to prevent a MagSafe adaptor from just pulling out.

It needs it because it has 4 USB 2 ports and the power supply needs to be able to supply power to all of them if it needed to. You'll notice that some laptop ports can't supply full power to some high draw devices.

Plus it used higher power conventional fans that are quieter but use more power.
 
Completely Agree...

Yeah it is fake. Why would they have a miniDVI and a minidisplay port? That's not Apple.

5 usb ports too are a stretch. Bogus!!!

Also, I'll just bet we see a case redesign with a black top and apple to mirror the current styling of the laptops, iMac and phone. White is so last year.
 
.
.
.
---=== IT'S FAKE!!! ===---
.
.
.


http://www.9to5mac.com/mac-mini-fake

But the most damning evidence comes from Dave himself, who noticed that the Mini DisplayPort and Mini DVI aren't lined up with where the motherboard is. While Apple could have lifted the ports, that kind of setup weakens the joints. Would Apple risk this type of behavior on the back of a consumer level machine - on the monitor port, the one which will likely incur the biggest load?

Looked fake - but this does take the cake.

I worked as a Hardware Engineer and should've seen it....
 
As a photo retoucher, I'd like to mention that whenever photos like this get posted, everybody and their mother magically becomes an expert on lighting, photography and digital retouching.

You're not. For God's sake, you're not.

This is a very real photo cropped down and blown up from a larger photo taking under crap lighting conditions. If I am wrong, then whoever created this photo is ****ING AMAZING, because they successfully managed to whittle together photos of different ports taking under different lighting conditions, make it look like they were all taking under the SAME (crap) lighting conditions, and yet keep the blur, noise and even the color artifacts of the digital photo consistent and believeable throughout.

If this is fake, I will gladly buy the creator of the photo the new Mac Mini when it comes out as reward for the greatness. All they need to do is send me their source files and the PSD file of their photo retouching MASTERPIECE as proof.

I could not have said it any better myself
 
Then why would my TV manufacturer specificly state in it's owners manual a PC can only use the VGA port and not the HDMI ports to display on the TV?

Perhaps because your TV is a cheap piece of crap?

All recent (~ 1.5 years) TVs from known "quality" brands have no problem with pc input (via DVI adapter) on HDMI ports.
 
That's a good point. FrontRow is so dysfunctional on the mac that its not worth the efforts. My biggest gripe with it ( and there are more than one) is that after all this time that its been shipping on macs one cannot do simple things like categorize movies based on genres or make custom folders. How the heck or you supposed to keep track of a movie collection and use it with front row if it can't do that. I would buy the mini if it worked with frontrow like it should. Also, I can't justify buying an appleTV with the ridiculously small hard drives that they ship with only to be forced to strap on an external hard drive. Seems that apple isn't taking this whole digital hub thing very seriously.

I use PLEX (Former XBMC) with my Mini and it does exactlty what you want it to do. Excellent piece of software and free. I love my mini hooked up to my home theatre.

I don't really see much of an upgrade for the current users of the mac mini. Maybe wireless N would be a big plus however i already added that to mine.
 
Here's my question:

Allegedly it has a 2.0 GHz Core 2 Duo with 1066 MHz RAM. My last gen MacBook has a 2.4 GHz Core 2 Duo, but with 667 MHz RAM.

Which is going to be faster? Processor is faster in the MacBook, but the memory speed is almost half that of the mini's. Just curious which would win out in a compute-off. Thanks.
 
As a photo retoucher, I'd like to mention that whenever photos like this get posted, everybody and their mother magically becomes an expert on lighting, photography and digital retouching.

You're not. For God's sake, you're not.

This is a very real photo cropped down and blown up from a larger photo taking under crap lighting conditions. If I am wrong, then whoever created this photo is ****ING AMAZING, because they successfully managed to whittle together photos of different ports taking under different lighting conditions, make it look like they were all taking under the SAME (crap) lighting conditions, and yet keep the blur, noise and even the color artifacts of the digital photo consistent and believeable throughout.

If this is fake, I will gladly buy the creator of the photo the new Mac Mini when it comes out as reward for the greatness. All they need to do is send me their source files and the PSD file of their photo retouching MASTERPIECE as proof.


You took the words right out of my mouth! Manipulating high-resolution, taken under studio-condition pictures is much more easier then making a such a perfect looking one which has really crap lightning conditions.

THERE'S ALSO a report from appleinsider where they claim to have a picture since late 2008 on which the mini just look like the released one which is going around the world (even local newspaper websites are reporting it).
 
Yeah it is fake. Why would they have a miniDVI and a minidisplay port? That's not Apple.

5 usb ports too are a stretch. Bogus!!!

What would make me make the jump is simply a superdrive in the $599 dollar model. I am OK with what ports I have and I wouldn't need two display/monitor ports.
 
Perhaps because your TV is a cheap piece of crap?

All recent (~ 1.5 years) TVs from known "quality" brands have no problem with pc input (via DVI adapter) on HDMI ports.

That's a little harsh. Not everyone buys a new TV every 1.5 years. My new big screen has no issue with PC connectivity (DVI or HDMI), but I bought one only 4 years ago with a DVI input(!) that specifically said it would not work with a PC.

Neither unit was a piece of crap. The older one simply didn't have the decoder hardware necessary to deal with the input that comes from a PC. At the time, it was a "luxury" feature that most purchasers simply didn't care about.
 
I use PLEX (Former XBMC) with my Mini and it does exactlty what you want it to do. Excellent piece of software and free. I love my mini hooked up to my home theatre.

I don't really see much of an upgrade for the current users of the mac mini. Maybe wireless N would be a big plus however i already added that to mine.

I've not tried PLEX directly. I've used Boxee (which has its own version of XBMC installed in it), but now that I won't have Hulu content on it, I'm not sure if my next purchase will be centered around it or not.

Does PLEX work with the Apple remote currently? That's really the thing for my next purchase. My wife will not mess with a keyboard and mouse in order to watch TV. It simply won't happen. If I can get some kind of remote that can control the thing, however, that's a different thing.

I'm hoping that the next :apple:TV supports HDMI-CEC standards. If I could hack Netflix and Hulu support into it, I'd be golden.
 
Let's hope it comes out soon as I REALLY need to replace this :apple: Powermac G4. It is on it's last legs.
also ,10.5 to me doesn't run any slower then 10.4 did
 
I've not tried PLEX directly. I've used Boxee (which has its own version of XBMC installed in it), but now that I won't have Hulu content on it, I'm not sure if my next purchase will be centered around it or not.

Does PLEX work with the Apple remote currently? That's really the thing for my next purchase. My wife will not mess with a keyboard and mouse in order to watch TV. It simply won't happen. If I can get some kind of remote that can control the thing, however, that's a different thing.

I'm hoping that the next :apple:TV supports HDMI-CEC standards. If I could hack Netflix and Hulu support into it, I'd be golden.

Yes PLEX supports the apple remote and the Logitech Harmony remotes which is what i use. I also use remote Buddy for full control of the Mini without the need for the keyboard and mouse. Mini connects to HD TV via HDMI and Sound is optical out to 5.1 receiver. Plex upconverts video to near HD and outputs 5.1 sound.
 
I'd call this a shopped picture, the angels are off, look at the vent holes and the powercable they don't line up.

I hope they bring it out soon so i can decide wether to upgrade my current MM or stay with it.
 
Connectors don't work that way!

Connectors are generally mounted on a flat circuit board, then holes are cut in the back plastic to let the connector poke through to the outside. This means that on one side (the side soldered onto the circuit board) EVERY connector on the back of the machine is lined up.

So if you have a thinner connector such as a mini display port then the bottom side of it will be aligned with the bottom side of the USB and Power ports. The photoshopper did not understand this mechanical issue and instead aligned the two new ports so that their CENTERs matches the USB center.

For an example of this phenomena, check out the images of the back of todays Mac Mini where the DVI port is aligned with all the other ports on the bottom edge. But because the DVI is not as tall as the USB, the tops of the connectors do not align.

This is the first intelligent thing I have heard all day, though I still think its real. because modifications can be made.
 
Perhaps because your TV is a cheap piece of crap?

All recent (~ 1.5 years) TVs from known "quality" brands have no problem with pc input (via DVI adapter) on HDMI ports.

Care to source your claim?

My Samsung HDTV (that's less than 1 year old) does not technically support a PC connection over HDMI either. In fact, the manual warns against it.

There are probably a few things that go into this:

1. If you have 720p HDTV, it's actual resolution is likely 1366x768. For whatever reason, most PCs and all Macs don't support this resolution natively. Additionally, if you try setting the resolution at 1280x720 you'll likely get overscan issues. The only way to truly get the correct resolution is to create a custom resolution with something like DisplayConfigX or SwitchResX. This is tedious and will take an ample amount of time as custom resolutions vary per TV.

I've read that this has something to do with 1366x768 not being divisible by 8.

If you want to avoid this issue, purchase a 1080p HDTV.

2. HDTVs are designed to scale and process images over the HDMI port. Many don't include options to turn image processing off. Therefore, if you decide to go against the manufacturer's suggestion (with something like a DVI to HDMI cable) your TV will continue to color balance, sharpen and scale the output from your computer.

For video content, this is absolutely fine. However, many manufacturers assume you're going to use your HDTV as an actual display with your PC or Mac, not just as media center screen (Front Row, Boxee, WMC, etc.)

If you use the DVI or VGA port, this usually doesn't happen. The TV will just display the input unprocessed. The computer will then have full control over all processing (on Windows, the ATI and NVIDIA control panels will allow you do color balancing, etc). This is why you see complaints from people who say their picture is "muddy" or "dark" when using the VGA port. Additionally, 1366x768 is generally not supported over VGA or DVI either (although most TVs get close, you'll likely lose a strand of vertical pixels along the edge of your screen).

There is something that can be done in software to fix issue one. For example, Windows Vista does not support 1366x768. However, if you launch Windows Media Center within Vista and select your HDTV as 720p, the screen resolution changes to be compatible (using DVI to HDMI) filling the full frame.

If you just select 1280x720 within the Windows display control panel, this does not happen (centered frame, no scaling up to 1366x768 occurs).

I don't know for sure (as I've never seen it discussed officially) but Media Center must be doing something to emulate a video signal. At that point, your HDTV knows it's OK to scale up 1366x768.

Manufacturers could easily fix issue two by allowing the ability to turn off all image processing (this is usually only available via complicated service menus). Then, consumers could decide how they want to their HDTVs to scale and process inputs.
 
its a damn fake!!!

http://i.gizmodo.com/5157263/mac-mini-2009-leak-analyzed-declared-fake


fake-mini.jpg
 
Faker than fake. No way will there be mini DVI AND displayport. Makes no sense.
It makes perfect sense. The mini DVI is there to support legacy hardware and Apple has plenty of adapters for this type of connection. The mini DisplayPort is for Apple's updated displays. Hopefully, we will be able to use two monitors with the updated Mac mini.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.