Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
I can not see this be useful and taking off we have already been through the flip phone stage.
 
Regardless of the skepticism and complaints from everybody I'm quite excited to experience this launch event for first-of-its-kind breakthrough technology even if it is not inherently perfect from the get-go.

I've been waiting to see this technology launch for years. Even if I don't end up buying it (that $1800 price tag....) I have a strongly invested interest in this and will certainly be as giddy as a schoolgirl during the event.

Also.... I'm VERY interested to find out what Apple has in store for this technology.
 
Comments are salty as hell. I can't even imagine how loved would be Apple for doing this. It's a breakthrough tech and it's just sad some of you can't accept that.

Apple would require at least another 2 years of testing and design before they'd release something like this. You haven't even seen if this thing works yet. And exactly what is "breakthrough" about this tech? We've been seeing demos of it for NINE years.
[doublepost=1550670311][/doublepost]
Funny that most companies are in the frontier of innovation (even if it’s still useless) while Apple is struggling to make a proper keyboard on the MacBooks and yet have the balls to ask $2000...

It’s our fault, it’s my personal mistake by blindly purchasing overpriced junk from this company.

View attachment 822679

That is not the frontier of innovation...
 
Samsung has the balls to make fun of apple for their notch.... look at theirs on this thing!!!! (If it’s true that is)
 
Let's jump 4 - 10 years from now... "apple waited until THEY get it right."

How much would you like to bet that this typical Samsung prototype ends up like the Galaxy Gear? We're talking about a company that will throw everything at the wall to see what sticks, without even first making sure it's a quality product. Then, if it sticks, they'll start iterating on it repeatedly across regions and you'll quickly regret having bought the first one. THAT is what Apple waits to do right. If you can't see that or why people say that, you're blind.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Totemsflare
... because Samsung created this first and did most of the heavy lifting on developing the tech?
Sure. There are patents that were posted on this for a similar looking phone 4 years ago. So, a company who would have been supplying sample screens and chips and know for copying everything, likely put together the pieces and pushed it through.
 
... because Samsung created this first and did most of the heavy lifting on developing the tech?

Wrong. DuPont developed this tech 19 years ago, they even handed over a manufacturing process. So many people have so little understanding of Samsung's role in this industry.

Microsoft of all companies patented a similar phone literally 9 years ago.
 
  • Like
Reactions: arhh and I7guy
Oh look, they copied the iPhone again. Then ran it over with a steam roller and bent it.

That being said... 4.6" you say. You have my attention, Samedung.
 
Sure. There are patents that were posted on this for a similar looking phone 4 years ago. So, a company who would have been supplying sample screens and chips and know for copying everything, likely put together the pieces and pushed it through.
Wrong. DuPont developed this tech 19 years ago, they even handed over a manufacturing process. So many people have so little understanding of Samsung's role in this industry.

Microsoft of all companies patented a similar phone literally 9 years ago.
Ah, but did they fully develop the technology, including the manufacturing of components, actually put that into a device and bring it to market? (i.e. realise an idea).
 
IMHO the future is AR (glasses), not mechanically stressed screens.


So a full screen outside and an even bigger screen on the inside - good for manufacturers, bad for device cost.


QFT!


Especially as - if it's one screen that gets actually folded and not two separate screens that align in opened state - the pixels are so small and fragile that I can't imagine how they would survive continuous mechanical stress from folding mid- to long-term.

And laptops don't fold across the display.

As I said above, I see AR glasses as a more viable solution for big (virtual) "screens" with small physical device footprint. I will closely follow the presentation and reviews of Samsungs solution, but also keep an eye on longer-term experiences. Perhaps Samsung can convince me of the robustness of their folding screen tech, but for now colour me sceptical.

AR glasses will NEVER catch on, because far too many people have to wear actual glasses and they won’t want to faff around with extra bits on them or more weight. They are a bit of a pointless idea really. Please like phones and they need to stick to those really.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Falhófnir
How much would you like to bet that this typical Samsung prototype ends up like the Galaxy Gear? We're talking about a company that will throw everything at the wall to see what sticks, without even first making sure it's a quality product. Then, if it sticks, they'll start iterating on it repeatedly across regions and you'll quickly regret having bought the first one. THAT is what Apple waits to do right. If you can't see that or why people say that, you're blind.

Ohhhh give me a break :D
 
  • Like
Reactions: ROGmaster
I could see the benefit of this, the small form factor of a flip phone, the power of a smart phone. Put a display on the outside as well for when its flipped and you have something really cool. Only thing i really question is the battery, since it has to be rigid it can't fold unless you put in 2 batteries (one for each part).
 
This seems like a classic example of ability over practicality - it exists because they wanted to make one, but doesn’t seem to serve any practical or functional reason. Phones fit the hand. Want something bigger, use a tablet.

Oh well, time will tell...

The attitude people had with phone camera's. Want to take a photo? Use your camera.

Want to use a GPS? Use your TomTom

<could continue for 100 other use cases>

In the end, I don't like watching stuff personally on a phone, but who knows, that might change if the screen could double in size. I am not saying this would definitely be a hit (3D TV definitely wasn't), but your argument does't hold merit (i.e. go buy a tablet).
 
  • Like
Reactions: arkitect
Funny that most companies are in the frontier of innovation (even if it’s still useless) while Apple is struggling to make a proper keyboard on the MacBooks and yet have the balls to ask $2000...

It’s our fault, it’s my personal mistake by blindly purchasing overpriced junk from this company.

View attachment 822679
Only a sheep would think the sheep line is deeply original.

Why do Android fanboys like to lie about their Apple purchases?
 
Game over, Apple. Time for bed. 3D TV, curved displays, and now folding displays. Apple’s downfall is all due to Steve Jobs. That useless man took Computer out of Apple Computer. Smart people jumped ship then. Real people need real computers. Thankfully Samsung is now the new Apple: computers for the rest of us.
 
I love the innovation, but in this case I would wait a couple of generations for hardware and software maturity.
 
Given that most people unlock their phones 100s of times a day, I’m super skeptical about the durability of folding designs. Besides, what a PITA instead of just picking up your phone and looking at it.
If it folded screen-outwards it might be useful. Phone for one handed use, mini tablet when you need a bit more real estate.
[doublepost=1550673541][/doublepost]
Game over, Apple. Time for bed. 3D TV, curved displays, and now folding displays. Apple’s downfall is all due to Steve Jobs. That useless man took Computer out of Apple Computer. Smart people jumped ship then. Real people need real computers. Thankfully Samsung is now the new Apple: computers for the rest of us.
I’ve never met anyone who owned a curved display.

I’ve never seen anyone actually use their tv for 3D.

I’ve yet to see anyone explain why a folded phone, particularly one that folds so the screen is on the inside, is of any use to anyone.

I’ve seen thousands of people with apple watches and iPhones. There are Apple TVs installed throughout my office building.

How is it “game over” for Apple just because Samsung continues to throw every gimmick it can at the wall? Just because something is technically possible doesnt mean anyone finds it necessary to buy.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.