Apple is so slow with Mac hardware and software development. Why another 13" when they want to go 14" anyway?
14" is only a rumour and just sounds like speculation based on the 15-16" switch. As is this 13" rumour of course - although a MBP update around now (with the scissor keyboard) would hardly be a case for Mulder and Scully.
13.3" to 14.0" would be a bigger size jump (especially in terms of proportional increase) than 15.4 to 16".
...but yes, it does defy reason that the #4 largest PC maker with a high 9-digit market cap and a gold-filled swimming pool forever has a lame duck in their range because they can only squeeze out one new model every 6 months.
Makes sense. If you upgrade the Air to a quad core i5 and 16gb of RAM it cost the same as the entry MacBook Pro, but has better specs.
Yeah, I'm not sure what the entry-level Mac Pro (the one with lower-power processors and only 2 ports) is there for since they Retina-d the Air.
Not sure if it's a good idea to buy the last Intel MacBook Pro, or buy the first Apple CPU MacBook Pro. On the one hand, I won't have to worry about potential issues if I buy the last one.
Well, the switch to ARM is also only a rumour so far. My
guess is that if they're going to release ARM Macs in 2021 they'll have to announce a developer program at virtual!WWDC this year (as happened with the Intel switch) so you'll have fair warning.
Also - it depends on what sort of software you use: I'd expect Apple apps, and most "modern" Xcode-era apps to go native very rapidly, but big "pro" apps nit so much,
especially if you have a lot of third-party plugins. Windows virtualisation/BootCamp is going to be a dead duck on ARM of course, Linux/docker not so much a problem, since they're already well developed on ARM and founded on source-level rather than binary compatibility.
I'm kinda "for" a switch to ARM, but Apple have to make sure that the 'last' Intel Macs are bang up-to-date, allow a decent transition period and not use it as an excuse to dumb-down MacOS.