Works fineAnybody installed 1 or 2 2TB Samsung NvME SSD on the X1E? Does it work well?
Works fineAnybody installed 1 or 2 2TB Samsung NvME SSD on the X1E? Does it work well?
Anybody installed 1 or 2 2TB Samsung NvME SSD on the X1E? Does it work well?
On my Yoga C930, it could handle Office work well but when I tried to test its performance by flipping the image upside-down (a simple task?) using Photoshop, I saw lag in performance. In other tasks, I could see the program processing blocks of images on the screen before the tasks were completed. I don't recall seeing lag on the X1E.
On my L390Y I just went into Photoshop and I opened a 57.7M RAW photo (5184x3888 pixels) and I flipped and rotated it in various ways - it was absolutely instant. No lag whatsoever. I then upscaled and doubled the size of the picture to 10,000 pixels across and repeated the process - still instant. I then did some liquify filter work on the same picture and it was very fast. I then made 7 adjustment layers and worked on those, and flipped it again - virtually instant.
On my X1E there was a bit of lag doing anything graphical in 4K resolution, but never 'very slow' or blocky. When I switched it down to 1080p it was faster. Maybe you should try that on your C930 to see if it makes a difference, but if you're seeing blocks on the screen then that sounds very odd.
I've explained the situation with my X1E in this thread - there may have been something wrong with it which is why I am going to re-order. Or the slowness could simply be down to having the 4k version. I'll soon find out.
What do u use to benchmark and test how stable your underclock is?It's all in this thread, these questions have been answered several times. Plenty of tips and experiences have been shared so if you re-read everything you can make a list of things you can try if you need to.
There is no 'recommended value' for undervolting. As has been said already - all chips are cut differently to they will respond a little differently. Personally I would start at -0.110v and then go up on 0.005v increments till you hit your limit, then drop down by 0.005 and retest, until stable. There are lots of guides online for both XTU and Throttlestop, whichever you choose. You can undervolt the GPU as well.
I just used cinebench and used the computer. If the computer crashes, then the underclock setting is over zealous. I found that a setting in the -1.6 range didn't crash the computer immediately, it booted up, but after a few hours of usage, or even the next day it would crashWhat do u use to benchmark and test how stable your underclock is?
I just used cinebench and used the computer. If the computer crashes, then the underclock setting is over zealous. I found that a setting in the -1.6 range didn't crash the computer immediately, it booted up, but after a few hours of usage, or even the next day it would crash
I just went on my own experience and confirming my settings, I have it set to -1.40. Mostly, because I don't want to deal with any instabilities and the computer is fast.From Reddit, the consensus seems to be -150mV. They have taken a tolerance of 10% into consideration.
What do u use to benchmark and test how stable your underclock is?
Ok I'm using handbreak instead to bench by encoding a mkv movie 1080p to mp4 on my main pc which I'm overclocking nowThrottleStop has it's own self-test routine built into it, TS Bench any errors the Offset Voltage needs to be raised as the CPU is unstable.
As for a default undervolt value none exists as each CPU is unique. Computer needs to be monitored for stability on and off load, and battery etc. My own notebook with 8750H can go as deep as -170mV, equally to ensure stability across the full operating range including TDP Down I typically run it at -140mV.
Q-6
Ok I'm using handbreak instead to bench by encoding a mkv movie 1080p to mp4 on my main pc which I'm overclocking now
Quite the opposite. Handbreak is more valid then ts bench.Handbreak wont show if the CPU is stable, TS Bench will as that's it's purpose. Once your certain stability is solid, I'd then just get on with using the system.
Q-6
Quite the opposite. Handbreak is more valid then ts bench.
Ts bench always passes yet when I use lr or play games it will crash randomly.
I then started using handbreak to test and since its passed that my system has been stable for everything
So how come it crashes on full load and not in ts benchmark? I don't just browser the Internet on my computers. I make them work!Min are fine, no lock ups. Like I said your only achieving stability under full load there's a lot more variables with modern CPU's.
Q-6
So how come it crashes on full load and not in ts benchmark? I don't just browser the Internet on my computers. I make them work!
If I change my undervolt to -1.6, it will pass under benchmarks, but will eventually crash. As noted, the benchmarks cannot fully exercise all aspects of the computer and the overly aggressive undervolt will hit a situation that crashes it. I've seen some people offer a prime95 test for 24 hours, but that seems a little extreme. For the X1E, I have mine set to -1.40 and I'm happy. Its a nice balance of power and temperature. I've said this before, I'm not looking to squeeze out every ounce of performance. I've largely stopped monkeying with my system at this point, its running exactly how I need it to run.So how come it crashes on full load and not in ts benchmark? I don't just browser the Internet on my computers. I make them work!
If I change my undervolt to -1.6, it will pass under benchmarks, but will eventually crash. As noted, the benchmarks cannot fully exercise all aspects of the computer and the overly aggressive undervolt will hit a situation that crashes it. I've seen some people offer a prime95 test for 24 hours, but that seems a little extreme. For the X1E, I have mine set to -1.40 and I'm happy. Its a nice balance of power and temperature. I've said this before, I'm not looking to squeeze out every ounce of performance. I've largely stopped monkeying with my system at this point, its running exactly how I need it to run.
If I change my undervolt to -1.6, it will pass under benchmarks, but will eventually crash. As noted, the benchmarks cannot fully exercise all aspects of the computer and the overly aggressive undervolt will hit a situation that crashes it. I've seen some people offer a prime95 test for 24 hours, but that seems a little extreme. For the X1E, I have mine set to -1.40 and I'm happy. Its a nice balance of power and temperature. I've said this before, I'm not looking to squeeze out every ounce of performance. I've largely stopped monkeying with my system at this point, its running exactly how I need it to run.