Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Note re: the 45" 5k/2k OLED. It's due out later this year in 39" which makes it a much more productivity-friendly 140ppi, which is the same as the current Dell and LG used by many. It's *also* due in 34" which will have an even higher PPI though I'm too lazy to do the math right now.

5120x2160:

45" - 123.5 ppi - Minimum retina seating distance 27.8"
39" - 142.5 ppi - Minimum retina seating distance 24.1"
34" - 163.4 ppi - Minimum retina seating distance 21.0"
30" - 185.3 ppi - Minimum retina seating distance 18.6"
27" - 205.8 ppi - Minimum retina seating distance 16.7"

The first two sizes are non-starters for me. The 34" at 163 ppi would be OK, but I want an upgrade from my current 163 ppi monitor. As mentioned earlier, a hypothetical 30" monitor at 185 ppi would be great, but it's not on the roadmap.

I sit at around 22-25" away from the screen, which is why that 34" 5K2K monitor would work, with its minimum recommended seating distance of 21", but nonetheless with 163 ppi I still do notice text isn't quite perfectly crisp when non-integer scaling is used.

Thus, I will stick with the plan of getting a 5-6K 31.5-32" monitor.

5120x2880 31.5" - 186.5 ppi - Minimum retina seating distance 18.4"
6016x3384 31.5" - 219.1 ppi - Minimum retina seating distance 15.7"
6144x3456 32.0" - 220.3 ppi - Minimum retina seating distance 15.6"

BTW, here are the Asus 6K specs. Technically it says 218 ppi (like Apple's monitors). Rounding error above, but close enough.

Screenshot 2025-04-02 at 3.27.31 PM.png
 
Last edited:
5120x2160:

45" - 123.5 ppi - Minimum retina seating distance 27.8"
39" - 142.5 ppi - Minimum retina seating distance 24.1"
34" - 163.4 ppi - Minimum retina seating distance 21.0"
30" - 185.3 ppi - Minimum retina seating distance 18.6"
27" - 205.8 ppi - Minimum retina seating distance 16.7"

The first two sizes are non-starters for me. The 34" at 163 ppi would be OK, but I want an upgrade from my current 163 ppi monitor. As mentioned earlier, a hypothetical 30" monitor at 185 ppi would be great, but it's not on the roadmap.

I sit at around 22-25" away from the screen, which is why that 34" 5K2K monitor would work, with its minimum recommended seating distance of 21", but nonetheless with 163 ppi I still do notice text isn't quite perfectly crisp when non-integer scaling is used.

Thus, I will stick with the plan of getting a 5-6K 31.5-32" monitor.

5120x2880 31.5" - 186.5 ppi - Minimum retina seating distance 18.4"
6016x3384 31.5" - 219.1 ppi - Minimum retina seating distance 15.7"
6144x3456 32.0" - 220.3 ppi - Minimum retina seating distance 15.6"

BTW, here are the Asus 6K specs. Technically it says 218 ppi (like Apple's monitors). Rounding error above, but close enough.
Thanks for doing the math! I'm on the current/old 40" LG so the 39" would be a cross grade in PPI but obviously a massive improvement in other specs.

I wonder for the 6K under discussion here what the HiDPI resolutions are? I use 3840 x 1620 on the 40" I have and get 3 columns which I consider to be full width for my needs. Just guessing but based on physical real estate a 32" 6K may function more like a 2-column screen. That would be tough for me to accept after getting so used to 3.


Sorry EugW not sure how this quote got here and I can't figure out how to delete it.
 
Note re: the 45" 5k/2k OLED. It's due out later this year in 39" which makes it a much more productivity-friendly 140ppi, which is the same as the current Dell and LG used by many. It's *also* due in 34" which will have an even higher PPI though I'm too lazy to do the math right now.

That slide refers to panel production. The displays wont be out on the market until spring 2026.
 
  • Like
Reactions: DaveOP and EugW
As LG's stunning new 45" curved 5K OLED has been priced at 2000, would it be safe the say the new 6K Ultrafine will be around this price too?

 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.