Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
the servers are slowly coming back up... I still get "we'll be back" but it's quicker and more consistent
 
What's frustrating is that this happens at every single product launch. Sometimes I wonder what they're thinking. Does Apple think that no one will care and hence no one will hit the website? Or do they just not think it's worth it to beef up capacity to handle ad-hoc loads like this?
 
Post PC era... cool.

Now get past this **** Apple store era and we are gold Apple! Time to evolve
 
Woah my post got passed up by a few pages! haha. Still wondering, I do not have a Apple store near me. If I preorder will there be a option to ship to my house?
 
Tried the iPhone Apple store app. Got as far as entering my password to check out and then nothing, its gone offline again now. It may have gone through I suppose, but I've not had an email confirmation yet.
 
What's frustrating is that this happens at every single product launch. Sometimes I wonder what they're thinking. Does Apple think that no one will care and hence no one will hit the website? Or do they just not think it's worth it to beef up capacity to handle ad-hoc loads like this?

Its nearly impossible and not cost effective to beef up capacity to handle the entire internet for once a year processing. These headaches are far more economical.
 
Then I think your point is trivial and irrelevant to Apple and consumers alike (not to mention incorrect, because I doubt Siri or anything comparable is what makes people change their minds and purchase an iPhone or iPad, so you've basically said that Apple failed to meet an unreasonable standard).

Trivial and irrelevant...man you need to lay off the morning coffee or something. If you disagree with me, that's cool, but keep it respectful.

I waited for Siri myself (skipped the 4 and bought a 4s) because I like to feel like I'm buying the future, and not just a "product". Others may differ. But I think a lot of people get caught up in that excitement. Of course, Steve Jobs could somehow make even moderate updates seem like we were buying a Mr. Fusion.
 
I'm most excited about the new iPhoto, and the ability to be able to re-download iTunes movies (too bad not all the movies I used the redemption code to download the digital copy show up though, only some do)
 
now I remember why queuing up outside the stores on launch day was more appealing than trying to preorder....
 
...OK. First off how can they shock anyone when the concept of the iPad has been out for two years now...

Too many quotes for me to reply to. Some of us work, ya know.

1)Retina has been out for awhile in other Apple products...screen resolution is typically something that is enhanced every or every other product cycle at Apple and other similar product companies. Why you or anyone else thinks/thought that the 3.0 wasn't going to be retina is beyond me. Minutes after the iPad 2.0 came out, everyone was stating "well, guess we wait till 2012 to see Retina in iPad".

2)Does Cook's phrase "mind-blowing" from a few weeks ago ring a bell? He did not mention specifically the iPad 3.0 would be mind-blowing but to me, this update is far from mind-blowing. Nice new tech specs, little real-world features. This is why I was stating there was no awe-shock in this release.

I honestly can't think of a lot of mind-blowing features or ultra-cool stuff that COULD HAVE BEEN in this update...that's for Apple to produce and wow me. Overall I think this update is non-impressive other than Retina (so now I can see my 10 year old, much-higher-rez-than-ipad2-quality-1024x768-screen JPGs on a nicer screen). If you don't own an iPad yet, sure, go buy this one next week instead of the 12 month old 2.0...with the exact same features as 2.0 but with a faster CPU and a nicer screen. Tech Spec product updates like this, in a brand new market, are not a sign of "revolutionary". The competitors now have a full year to work on FEATURES that will challenge the iPad 2012 and 2013.
 
I wouldn't be surprised if they are being hit with request 100,000 times normal.

What's frustrating is that this happens at every single product launch. Sometimes I wonder what they're thinking. Does Apple think that no one will care and hence no one will hit the website? Or do they just not think it's worth it to beef up capacity to handle ad-hoc loads like this?

No body is perfect and the jump in requests must be huge relative to average usage. I said a 100,000 in the tittle but it could easily be a million times more hits than average. Apple could very well sell 10 million of these by Monday.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.