Some of the blame on that has to land on MS. Teams code just seems to be horribly bloated. Who knows when they will come out with an Apple Silicon native version - but even on my work PC it is pretty laggy. The one device it works well on is my iPhone. I really hope MS rewrites Teams from the ground up.
Got a tip for us?
Let us know
Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
'M1 Pro' and 'M1 Max' Chip Names Appear in App Log Ahead of Monday's Apple Event
- Thread starter MacRumors
- Start date
- Sort by reaction score
Good point, however next year we’re rumoured to be getting
iPhone 14
iPhone 14 Max
iPhone 14 Pro
iPhone 14 Pro Max
further adding to the confusion. Really think it needs a ‘Pro Max’ moniker if they’re going with an M1 Pro
Does anyone else ever wonder, just in passing, if MacRumors.com is actually part of Apple…
Or if Apple have a full-on writers room, delivering each latest instalment in the narrative, piecemeal to the rumour-mongers?
Only 1 external screen, also some weird bugs like blinking. (resync caused, don't really know why) Having to change what USB-c port its in to get a picture sometimes.
You don't run the same things I do, 16G is bare, annoying, minimum, and my Windows PC's have more. (my desktop has 128G, and yes, I use it, mainly for VMs) I haven't bought an 8G machine in over a decade.
I don't do any serious rendering and very little rendering at all. And no serious gaming either. I'm an IT manager in a business, totally different usage of computers..
Teams constantly crashes for me. Its seems to crash very often when I try to post some C#/SQL code in a chat window.
TheYayAreaLiving 🎗️
Suspended
Apple is controlling all the leaks. They are mastermind behind it. Of course they are spending time on MacRumors as much as we do. All of a sudden, before the event we are getting hints for the 💻. Apple has decided to distract to customer over the weekend already. It’s a game they are playing.
Oh yes. Because that would work very well.
God if there was a marketing meeting like that, but to be a fly on the wall.
“You see we have this regular chip for the MacBook Air, and I think we should call it M1.
And then for the higher end version for the MacBook pros and the higher end IMAX, I think we should call it… the M1.
And then, for the big beast, the one we’re going to put in a Mac Pro with 32 CPU cores and 128 GPU, I think we should call it… the M1.”
I forgot this part. Not happening with digital computers. As phones advance, so will computers, and their usage. physics is physics. If anything, your phone will become a remote terminal of some large computer you have back at home instead once we have fast enough wifi/cell access.
....Take a look at the Mac Pro. In fact let me help you since I know you wont.
They are all "Intel W". Apple can do the same with M1. Just list CPU and GPU core counts. What do you expect will happen when the get to the Mac Pro Apple Silicon version? M1 Pro Max Super Duper Maxed Version? No, just say M1 with 64 CPU and 128 GPU.
That's what they're doing already. The A15 in the iPhone 13 isn't quite the same A13 as the one in the iPhone 13 Pro.
Might as well call the next chip the N1, and then the O1 and the P1…
Yes, they should get the USB committee to come up with names for them.
M1/M1 Pro/M1 Max are like i5/i7/i9. There are variations within each family, just like the M1 has 7- and 8-core CPUs.
The naming convention won't work with the Mac Pro class chips. So instead of just adding to confusion where the $50,000 Mac Pro will need to have a name of M1 Pro Max Super Edition, just say M1 with X CPU and Y GPU.
Notchbook Pro. This makes sense. As Steve said during the unveiling of the Intel MBP, it's right we put into the title what it is so that everybody knows it's a Mac. Likewise we need everybody to know it's a notch. Thus.