Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Ijustin did a great review. the Verge is just in a negative all the time.
waiting on MKHD review now.

When watching reviews just noticed the ratio of product showing on screen vs someone just sitting and talking.
 
  • Like
Reactions: planteater
Except for the absurd price, slower SSD, ugly huge notch, no FaceID, and several other major issues that have been mentioned, it's pretty good. I'm sure many people will be satisfied with it.
Absurd price: the 2018 MacBook Air redesign, the one that every negative person in these comments says is worth the money instead, also started at $1199.
It wasn’t until a year later that it got back down to that $999 price point, which I expect to happen here as well.
Face ID: without any button press confirmation like there is on the iPhone and iPad, Face ID on the Mac would be a disaster. And if I’m already having to press a button to confirm a purchase or whatever, why not just scan my finger while it’s there?
All of your other complaints are complete personal preference, so I don’t agree or disagree. The slower SSD thing is meh, but anyone who really cares clearly wasn’t gonna live off of 256 GB of storage anyway.
 
I don't even need to watch the reviews or look at the benchmarks. Gimped hardware for the sake of saving pennies and pushing customers to more expensive models.

-No multi-monitor support (something a bargain bin chromebook can do)
-Gimped Storage at a higher price (storage is always a bottleneck so who cares about the rest)

I could maybe argue the gimped storage if it was a huge cost difference but lets be serious at scale it was a rounding error on the books. Multi monitor is just a sales tactic zero technical reason to gimp it. If it can drive a 6k montior it can drive a couple 2K monitors. But they want either the monitor sale or the upgrade in their pockets.
 
Say what you want about Windows laptops, but if you buy the right one, you can upgrade the hell out of it. A while back, I bought an HP gaming laptop with modest specs, (8 core i7, 512GB SSD, 16GB RAM, Ti 1070 video with 6GB, Thunderbolt 3 port for $999) and converted it easily (8 screws, back cover pops right off) into 64GB RAM and 2+8 TB storage (2 SSD M.2 slots).

And its pretty thin too, so I don't buy that whole "if you want it to be thin, everything has to be soldered" nonsense. Total cost: $2,800. My Macbook Pro (8 core i9, 64GB RAM, 8TB SSD) was $5500 back in 2019. Built an equally powerful Windows laptop (more if you consider 10TB storage vs 8TB) for half the price. (I do a lot of video stuff, so I need a lot of storage and external drives are too cumbersome.)
And you can cook a meal at home for 10% of what it would cost in a restaurant. Not exactly a new concept.
 
It's definitely a lie to state the iPhone 13 WRT shallow depth-of-field completely equals a large-sensor, expensive movie camera.

Which… he didn’t really state.

Is “it’s just like a pro camera” an exaggeration? Maybe. Maybe not. Plenty of pros use one these days.

Nobody at Apple is pretending that iPhone cameras have similar optics as high-end cameras.
 
Imagine they could get the price down to like $799 in the US and under $999 or under in most other countries whose dollar is lower like Canada. This thing could seriously eat into Microsoft's market share.
For Apple, profit is king over market share. If they cared about market share, they'd lower prices to compete. They don't.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Menneisyys2
Which… he didn’t really state.

Is “it’s just like a pro camera” an exaggeration? Maybe. Maybe not. Plenty of pros use one these days.

Nobody at Apple is pretending that iPhone cameras have similar optics as high-end cameras.
You're factually wrong. He did state they're equivalent. There's no word "almost" in his statement or anything that would convey the meaning 'it's ALMOST like a pro camera'. Tim Cook stated in his iJustine "interview" (
at 3:54) the following: "it [Cinematic Mode] is like having a Hollywood rig in your pocket".

And no, I didn't misinterpret this statement as even MacRumors interpreted ( https://www.macrumors.com/2021/09/15/tim-cook-apple-event-interview/ ) this statement as "In the nearly 15 minutes' long interview, Cook describes the new camera features of the ‌iPhone 13‌, specifically Cinematic Mode, as a "mindblowing" addition to the iPhone that places it on par with professional high-end video equipment."

Again, no "almost" in the MacRumors interpretation either. They did interpret Cook's words as above: iPhone 13 Pros ' Cinematic Mode is the same, shallow DoF quality-wise, than high-end cameras.
 

You can see the smudges in this one real well I think. I think I'm leaning over to getting the space grey one.
 
The second I see anything reviewed by so called "tech expert" iJustine I switch off, I mean where was she when Apple first started gathering momentum in the iMac G3 days?

To echo my previous thoughts the real long standing Apple users should get these review units, we pay enough to buy them and care about using them, plus it'd be real world case studies not one of the "tech experts for hire"
 
I like the MBA-M2 and can see how it fills the needs of a majority of consumers so I expect it to sell very well.

I needed a new portable computer so I considered the MBA2 but decided for as often as I need to take a laptop somewhere I'll go with a MBPro.
 
I guess I may be standing alone in left field without a glove, but man am I looking forward to getting one of these. It ticks all the boxes for my usages and expectations! Love the midnight.
You are not the only one getting one, far from it!
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.