bjjp2 said:
This is a sincere question, not a troll. What am I missing?
Well, I have compared the Mini to few Dells and the like, and I noticed few things (these observations apply to low-end Dells and the like):
Dell and the like have a big and ugly case made from plastic. Mini has a small and gorgerous case made from adonized aluminium
Dell and the like use crappy integrated vid-card, whereas the Mini has a discrete vid-card
Dell and the like have several fans. Mini has one fan. So the Mini is more silent
Dell and the like ship with regural CD-ROM-drives, mini ships with CD-RW/DVD
Software-suite on the Mini is ALOT better than on the Dell, not to mention the OS
😉.
But seriously: does the Mini _really_ compete with some Dell full-tower? Of course you can use the Mini for same things as you could use the Dell, so in that sense it does. But if you are in the market for a machine like the Mini, obviously Dell is not an alternative. Also, if you value the features of the Dell, the Mini is not an alternative. For example, I want a small and silent computer with nice case that I could keep on my desk right next to my display. Expendability is not required. I had been looking at some Mini-ITX-machines, and they cost about the same as Mini does, while offering alot less performance. SFF-PC might do, but those are too big and too noisy. Some el-cheapo Dell tower NEVER crossed my mind as an alternative!
If you want "yet another computer", the Dell is as good choice as ever. But the Mini is something different. Of course you CAN buy the Mini as dime a dozen computer, but it's design is so clean and gorgerous that it's hard to view it as a "yet another computer". Comparing it to some generic Dell misses the point IMO.