Even if a Mac Pro does not arrive? NO! It must!
If the Mac Pro does not come Jan. 15, will it hold some sort of a record for being the product that has gone the longest without an update?
The eMac hasn't had an update in a loooong time either.
Even if a Mac Pro does not arrive? NO! It must!
If the Mac Pro does not come Jan. 15, will it hold some sort of a record for being the product that has gone the longest without an update?
Darth, resist the darkside you must. Easy, is the path to the darkside. Clear your mind. Focus your mind, your path has been chosen. 8 Core knight become you will.
I updated the drive in mine last year, I now have all three bays full. 360GB, what a massive amount of storage.
1st as bootable,
2nd for storage
3rd as my own time machine. Nothing wrong with doing it manually if you ask me.
I hope the old thing lasts, i'm going to keep it as an extra form of back up.
According to this poll, not really![]()
Sounds like one of the most reasonable theories we've heard so far. Nothing too outlandish, but all plausible.
The eMac hasn't had an update in a loooong time either.![]()
The eMac hasn't had an update in a loooong time either.![]()
I have this slight feeling that you know what's going to happen. If I remember correctly, you've stated your "opinion" before and it came out to be true. You must have sources![]()
10.5.0 was a public beta as I have said for a year or so, turned out to be all too true.
WHO GIVES A POO ABOUT A ULTRA PORTABLE!. YOU CAN'T ACTUALLY DO ANY SERIOUS WORK ON A SCREEN THAT'S 13", SO WHY THE HELL DO YOU WANT SOMETHING SMALLER. WHY IS IT TOO BIG? IS IT TOO HEAVY FOR YOU TO CARRY. WELL BE A MAN AND GROW SOME. GOD GAVE YOU MUSCLES FOR A REASON. SO GET OF YOUR LARD A$$'$ AND USE THEM.
I updated the drive in mine last year, I now have all three bays full. 360GB, what a massive amount of storage.
WHO GIVES A POO ABOUT A ULTRA PORTABLE!. YOU CAN'T ACTUALLY DO ANY SERIOUS WORK ON A SCREEN THAT'S 13", SO WHY THE HELL DO YOU WANT SOMETHING SMALLER. WHY IS IT TOO BIG? IS IT TOO HEAVY FOR YOU TO CARRY. WELL BE A MAN AND GROW SOME. GOD GAVE YOU MUSCLES FOR A REASON. SO GET OF YOUR LARD A$$'$ AND USE THEM.
Eh.. Page 2??
Wouldn't this rumor be about the most anticipated hardware update since August 2006?
But.... I am waiting for this baby!!![]()
I know, right? It's like it disappeared off the grid.
I've been thinking this too.
I hear people crying for a 'professional' sub-notebook. What kind of serious professional can be done on a 12" screen with no optical drive?
So pretty much another, stating the bleeding obvious "rumor"
seriously though if apple doesn't release a update to the mac pro will there be any professional people left who will actually take apple seriously?!
Apple should also rename DVD Studio Pro, as the January expected update should bring support for playing and burning BD media; the name could be Disk Studio Pro.
Hopefully 10.5.2 will include an updated DVD Player with HD DVD playback support.
Seriously! I can't understand the weird fetish some people have with a "sub-ultra think notebook". Like they seriously orgasm at the thought of a tablet. No optical drive? Less than 12" screen? And you want it to be "professional" too?? HA. What the crap do you intend to do with it? I mean is the 13" MacBook not small enough?? What's the point? It's not like you'd get a dedicated graphics card with it. If anything the specs would be lower than the MacBook's.
I get the feeling that it's these same people that get a hard at SSD and think a 64GB SSD would be "plenty". "Professional" and "64GB" should not be put in the same sentence.
Bull. Apple doesn't use the Intel compiler. They use GCC. They haven't stopped using GCC. They need to build PowerPC binaries too, and you can make a universal mach-o image out of a ICC-built x86_64 binary and GCC-built PPC one. No way they've stopped using XCode or change Xcode up this much post-release, either. GCC can support SSE4 just fine on its own.
Xcode supports multiple compiler backends. You can install Intel compilers and have Xcode use it. Xcode is not a compiler, it's an IDE. The advantage of Intel compilers are obvious, they produce faster binaries than GCC.Bull. Apple doesn't use the Intel compiler. They use GCC. They haven't stopped using GCC. They need to build PowerPC binaries too, and you can make a universal mach-o image out of a ICC-built x86_64 binary and GCC-built PPC one. No way they've stopped using XCode or change Xcode up this much post-release, either. GCC can support SSE4 just fine on its own.