Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
While I am just as excited (ok not as much) as the next person, is it really wise/right/sane to make this news when someone openly said he downloaded an illegal copy of the software but feels validated in doing so since he pre-ordred a family pack? Just curious but clearly it's ok or it wouldn't be here.

Leopard appears cool and it is great that the person who downloaded it finds mail to be blazing fast. RSS fees in Mail is indeed a cool feature. Not a must have but it will become a great to have in no time at all.
 
how to do clean install???

i want to do a clean install, but i want to keep my data and settings. how can i do that? i have Backup from .mac and an external hard drive, but is there a better way?
 
I call BS on this so-called "report"

Not to piss on the parade, but why is MacRumors glorifying software piracy,
even if this "report" is for real (which I highly doubt; most likely he's describing
a previously pirated Leopard build).
 
TimeMachine network

Hi.

Does timemachine works in a network? I mean, can u have an external disk on one iMac and the rest of the network backingup on the some one?

Thanks, and thanks for the first impressions!

Afonso Santos,
Portuguese Mac User
 
I will believe speed when I see it.

Someone saying something is fast is completely relative.
The rest of the stuff was good.
 
Not to piss on the parade, but why is MacRumors glorifying software piracy,
even if this "report" is for real (which I highly doubt; most likely he's describing
a previously pirated Leopard build).

Check the original thread for pictures.
 
Does Apple have any way of tracking pirated copies of Leopard (like how Windows makes you register as specific ID number for each copy)?

I've never had to enter a code or anything with any of my previous (legal) copies of operating systems so I guess I've never thought of what would happen when people stole it.
 
Crap, sorry!

If that's the case though, why is this page 1 news?

I assume it has to do with the law. They are allowed to report 3rd party information but not allowed to assist in obtaining that information. Not that i know anything about law, so don't take my word on it.
 
While I am just as excited (ok not as much) as the next person, is it really wise/right/sane to make this news when someone openly said he downloaded an illegal copy of the software but feels validated in doing so since he pre-ordred a family pack? Just curious but clearly it's ok or it wouldn't be here.

Jessica, I agree with you. This post will just encourage illegal file sharing. Which I think has two problems...

1. Lost of revenue for Apple. I don't want to lose Apple because of that and I don't want Apple to have to start with "Activation" to protect their product. They trust us, we should repay that trust by buying the product.

2. It just gives ammunition to the Music and Movie industries. I can hear the "I told you iPod owners steal music; that's why we need DRM" already.
:(
 
Wirelessly posted (Mozilla/5.0 (iPhone; U; CPU like Mac OS X; en) AppleWebKit/420+ (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/3.0 Mobile/1C28 Safari/419.3)

First impressions of the final version of Leoard is newsworthy.

You think AppleInsider had a "legal" copy of leopard to do their leopard series?

I do not condone piracy and we will ban anyone trying to distribute or facilitate piracy here. But if someone is honest/stupid enough to post first impressions of the final build of Leopard in a public forum, it is of interest.

arn
 
Was about to ask this question. If the user is reporting "blazing" speed increases on a dual core MacBook Pro, I'm looking forward to seeing what it produces on my quad core Mac Pro.

The Mac Pro is in line for the biggest improvements...

For me, the main changes should come in a speedier final Safari, as that is the app I use most...
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.