I have only some wishes:
- A new file system would be nice (ZFS?)
- I would like, if I could change the overall font size and windows color
Actually, you can change the system font. And you can also change the system skin.
I have only some wishes:
- A new file system would be nice (ZFS?)
- I would like, if I could change the overall font size and windows color
Operating System developer may be developing a new version of their Operating System, which is rumoured to have some kind of difference to their current release, and may be released some time in the future
What exactly does "Marble" look like, what are the features of it? Does anyone have any links to information?
I realise this is a rumours site, but even so how is this worthy of an article. What you've essentially said is
I mean really? Do ya think so? How long did it take to work that one out?
I have only some wishes:
- A new file system would be nice (ZFS?)
- I would like, if I could change the overall font size and windows color
- build in file overwrite/merge, similar to Windows/Linux
Hopefully they will bring out TRIM support for the SSDs !
Oh and a shortcut to maximise windows please..
10.6 is probably the worst 10.x since 10.0. Lots of problems and unhappy people.
People want things to "just work" again, not new eye candy and rearranging of the GUI.
WHY DON'T YOU FIX WHAT YOU STARTED/BROKE BEFORE STARTING SOMETHING NEW????!!!!!!!
I have been a Mac user for 18 years. The Mac experience used to be far superior and things truly did "just work".
Not any more.
My patience with Apple is wearing thin....
Well, it's called 'make a living on the dumb masses'. Can spew out anything you want as a rumor/article/whatever, we (the dumb masses) are still here commenting about it, thus making the site stay alive.
- some of the window features from Win7
But then why didn't Apple kill support for the first generation x86-only Core Duo/Solo systems? And
why isn't x64 supported on all systems with x64 CPUs?
iPhoneOS if deployed on a narrower range of hardware will be cheaper to sell since the QA process doesn't have to run over as wide a range of equipment and configurations. MacOS X will be more more robust in the hardware it is interacts with, but will be more expensive to buy.
So there are business and technical reasons not to merge the two. Makes lots of sense to share distinct components where advantageous; not merge .
Searching is still a disaster, sorting doesn't work, no column view, and I can't migrate over my Spotlight comments. Fun!
.
I want PPC support
10.6 is probably the worst 10.x since 10.0. Lots of problems and unhappy people.
People want things to "just work" again, not new eye candy and rearranging of the GUI.
WHY DON'T YOU FIX WHAT YOU STARTED/BROKE BEFORE STARTING SOMETHING NEW????!!!!!!!
I have been a Mac user for 18 years. The Mac experience used to be far superior and things truly did "just work".
Not any more.
My patience with Apple is wearing thin....
Aiden. I'm surprised man. An educated man like yourself can't understand the word "transition" ?![]()
I like it but the one problem is it interferes with Spaces. dragging a window to the right of the screen to snap it into place sometimes results in it moving to the next space if you don't release the mouse/trackpad quick enough. And this error is costly to undo.For those wanting the snap to maximise a screen fully, or snap to maximise to half screen size to do a side by side - I'd recommend Cinch.
I think that we'll see a new interface at the same time as we'll see resolution independence, as both are closely related.
Apple introduced in Leopard a new native UI framework called CoreUI. It can handle vector based interface widgets, and it does include the assets needed to recreate a vectorized Aqua interface.
The thing is, this feature hasn't been turned on in either 10.5 nor 10.6. You can see the vectorized interface by changing the resolution scale using developers tool to something other than 1.0x, or by using some commands that forces OS X to use the vectorized UI at 1.0x (I'm the guy that found these commands awhile ago...), but the result buggy and incomplete even when using Apple's own apps.
Normally in 10.5 and 10.6, at 1.0x scale, Aqua is rendered by a messy mix of the old HIToolBox Extras.rsrc file and some intermediary bitmap-based part of CoreUI from a file called SArtFile.bin.
So currently in 10.6, the Aqua interface framework is a patchy hack that's somewhere in between the old and the new UI framework. Before Apple decides to implement a brand new interface to replace Aqua, it will have to complete the transition to full CoreUI, which will be resolution independent.
A new interface, along with a complete transition to CoreUI doesn't guarantee that resolution independence will be in 10.7, but it's a required step before developers can really start to adapt their apps for RI.
And that's the bad side of a transition to resolution independence, apps have to be modified so they don't glitch when used at different scaling factors. At least, that was the case the last time Apple urged devs to prepare for RI (which was supposed to happen somewhere in 2008). Maybe Apple has decided to find a way so that unmodified apps will run in some special bitmap zoom mode, making the transition much easier for users.
While we did see some noticeable interface changes in Snow Leopard, I think that it's obvious that Apple decided to put all their efforts into rewriting a lot of the OS foundations and putting aside all the major interface changes until 10.7. Apple must have some eye-popping stuff planned for 10.7, they won't do what they did with Snow Leopard twice in a row...
heh. I wouldn't be surprised if they drop support for single-core machines.
And they should put floppy drives in their next Mac Pro, as well.