zzzz
At least for my own purposes, Lion sounds like a yawner. Some of its most highly touted features are stuff I've been doing for years using third-party software (for inst., DropCopy to move files between Macs on a LAN, Overflow to give me a tiled launching app., and I know there are auto-save utilities if I cared to use one). One new feature even manages to scare me a little (what are continual archived backups going to do to my hard disk space?). On the other hand, what seems to be conspicuously missing is any new "under the hood" innovation such as would make my Mac work better or faster. Even at the cheap price, weighing the advantages, such as they are, against the hassles inevitably involved in a system upgrade, since some third-party software developers take weeks or even months to come out with a new version, I seriously have to ask myself if this upgrade is worth it. This is a question Apple has never made me ask before.
At least for my own purposes, Lion sounds like a yawner. Some of its most highly touted features are stuff I've been doing for years using third-party software (for inst., DropCopy to move files between Macs on a LAN, Overflow to give me a tiled launching app., and I know there are auto-save utilities if I cared to use one). One new feature even manages to scare me a little (what are continual archived backups going to do to my hard disk space?). On the other hand, what seems to be conspicuously missing is any new "under the hood" innovation such as would make my Mac work better or faster. Even at the cheap price, weighing the advantages, such as they are, against the hassles inevitably involved in a system upgrade, since some third-party software developers take weeks or even months to come out with a new version, I seriously have to ask myself if this upgrade is worth it. This is a question Apple has never made me ask before.