Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.

What should be the Mac Pro form factor?

  • Go back to the PowerMac G3/G4 design! It was better!

    Votes: 19 3.8%
  • Keep the current design! It is so sleek!

    Votes: 135 26.9%
  • Revamp it, and bring us something new. I'm sick of the current design.

    Votes: 348 69.3%

  • Total voters
    502
what is the one more thing...

steve is a "product-guy" and he likes revolution not evolution. only a new macpro @ the wwdc? i see two possibilities:

1. re-designed macpro, intel and new design

or

2. new macpro of course intel (and maybe re-designed) and something else, that is completely new.

fact is, that he used the imac and the mbp as evolution products to introduce the intel processors. now that everyone accepted the intel imac and intel mbp as a "real mac" he can introduce something new. that is already noticeable with the new macbook.
I expect something, right now i am not really sure what to expect, but com'on only the expected macpro, no surprises, just a pc like "upgrade"? are you kidding me? no way!

there will be something else @ the wwdc :)
 
AidenShaw said:
You don't think that Apple believes in the Digital Hub?

Microsoft certainly does - visit some friend who has Windows Media Centre Edition and a couple of Xbox 360s as Media Centre Extenders. That's the only way that you'll realize how far behind Apple is in the digital home experience.

And shortly afterwards, you will realize how badly MS implemented it. Right now, there is no defacto standard way to 'rip' a DVD into a personal library (other than the DivX/XviD + MP3 in an AVI container, and don't get me started on that). Now I have a 360, but there are a couple flaws I have found so far:

1) You have to use Media Center Edition to play video... Well, I would love to, but there is no retail box for Media Center Edition. You have to wait for Vista if you don't want to go down the OEM disc route or buy a new system.

2) You can only playback WMV in the Windows Media container. You can do some transcoding tricks to allow other formats to play, or you can just re-encode everything into a format that only works on Windows.

Combine this with the fact that everyone's current collection is likely NOT in WMV, and most people are likely NOT using Media Center Edition... and you have a recipie for confused consumers who might honestly be interested. In my own experiments, the 360 is one of the better UPnP AV extenders out there, but it also shuts out other formats... making it hard for someone like me to actually use the extra functionality. The others I have tried all have some pretty nasty quirks and don't "Just work".

Seriously... MS may be far ahead, but they are running in place without a proper end-to-end scenario which includes letting the average joe create and manage a collection of DVDs (which may actually exist in Media Center), without OEMs which use good UI design, and with the vendor lock-out present in extenders such as the 360.

I am actually darn close to saying "To hell with it"... because nothing out there so far works WELL unless you are buying a full PC/Mini to hook up to your TV. :/
 
Krevnik said:
1) You have to use Media Center Edition to play video... Well, I would love to, but there is no retail box for Media Center Edition. You have to wait for Vista if you don't want to go down the OEM disc route or buy a new system.
Yes, how very "Apple" of Microsoft to include the media center in a hardware bundle.
(Customer: "I'd like to buy FrontRow, please." AppleStore: "Sorry.")

Krevnik said:
Right now, there is no defacto standard way to 'rip' a DVD into a personal library (other than the DivX/XviD + MP3 in an AVI container, and don't get me started on that).
Valid point - MS didn't include the tools to allow stealing DVDs in the base product. There are freeware downloads, however, to manage VIDEO_TS libraries withing MCE. (No "ripping" per se, just copy the DRM-protected files from the DVD to the hard drive.)

MCE is currently more TiVo-like, with an off-the-air focus.

Sony, however, sells MCE with a 200 disc DVD library (with double-layer burner) that handles the problem.

img_seriesimage_xl1.jpg


http://www.sonystyle.com/is-bin/INT...egoryName=tv_DigitalLivingSystem&Dept=tvvideo

The 200 disk changer
XL1B2.jpg

can be connected to any MCE PC, and can be daisy-chained to manage thousands of DVDs. (and it's much cheaper than buying hard drives to copy 200 DVDs to ;) )
 
Appleinsider re-invent warm water....

:rolleyes:

I mean, either they are blind or never read other websites than their own, but I think the subject has been deeply discussed, and at least in great details by www.hardmac.com; since months claims that at least the high end Mac Pro will be powered by WoodCrest (due to the reason of hte motherboard availability); Conroe could power entry-level Mac Pro; but Conroe could also find its way in iMacIntel.
related news by chronological order:
http://www.hardmac.com/news/2006-01-23/#5046
http://www.hardmac.com/news/2006-03-09/#5239
http://www.hardmac.com/news/2006-03-17/#5272
http://www.hardmac.com/news/2006-05-02/#5439
http://www.hardmac.com/news/2006-05-16/#5499
http://www.hardmac.com/news/2006-05-23/#5519
http://www.hardmac.com/news/2006-05-24/#5529
http://www.hardmac.com/news/2006-05-25/#5532
http://www.hardmac.com/news/2006-05-29/#5547

;)
 
AidenShaw said:
Yes, how very "Apple" of Microsoft to include the media center in a hardware bundle.
(Customer: "I'd like to buy FrontRow, please." AppleStore: "Sorry.")

Once Apple makes Front Row a requirement for Whiz-Bang Media Player TV Box(tm)... then I agree. But this is a case of a hardware bundle being used as part of vendor tie-in with another product. Front Row isn't there (yet).

Valid point - MS didn't include the tools to allow stealing DVDs in the base product. There are freeware downloads, however, to manage VIDEO_TS libraries withing MCE. (No "ripping" per se, just copy the DRM-protected files from the DVD to the hard drive.)

Thanks for the vote of confidence there... sure appreciate the assumption. Of course, MS and Apple do include the tools to allow stealing CDs (if we want to call it that, instead of the copyright infringement it is)... and yet we don't commonly refer to it as stealing, now do we? If I want a free DVD, I can just steal the disc itself and face lesser charges than copying a rental disc. Although until someone comes out and offers a legit solution for handling a video collection like iTunes/WMP/et al do for music... the commoner will download it or rip it themselves into formats like XviD + AVI.

MCE is currently more TiVo-like, with an off-the-air focus.

Which is I think one reason why Apple is shying away from the full package. IPTV is a potenially huge push in the coming decade, and would allow Apple to try to jump into the market with a combined solution which handles both streamed content, and stored content without requiring extra hardware to provide it.

Sony, however, sells MCE with a 200 disc DVD library (with double-layer burner) that handles the problem.

The 200 disk changer
XL1B2.jpg

can be connected to any MCE PC, and can be daisy-chained to manage thousands of DVDs. (and it's much cheaper than buying hard drives to copy 200 DVDs to ;) )

That is a bit of a monster, and in less space I can just do what I do now: NAS RAID-5 box which stores my DVD collection in H.264/MPEG-4, and a Mini hooked up to the TV. And my solution is a little cheaper it seems (I originally thought it was more expensive, until I saw the 3 grand price-tag, mine is under 2 grand).

Right now... there is nothing that 'just works' for the full package. MS tries to offer the full package, but falls flat thanks to crappy OEM support, and vendor tie-in on first party products. Apple provides the front-end for a single computer, and ignores the full package... but what they /do/ have works. I don't think we will see a clear solution anytime soon either, especially with hi-def disc formats potenially displacing DVDs in the next 10 years and the massive storage requirements for 1080p, and IPTV on the horizon which makes both MCE and Front Row TV solutions easier/cheaper/cleaner in the future.

Remember... Apple is NOT an innovator in new and unproven markets, at least with SJ back at the helm. If the iPod shows us anything, it is that Apple will likely wait until the market is just proven enough to show that it is viable, but still in disarray.
 
DrGruv1 said:
The title of the story that you linked to is:

Intel to launch "Core" on 26 June​

The woody has not been released, it will be released on 26 June.

It doesn't matter that everyone knows exactly what it is, or that some people already have them (I have two dual-dual Woodies), or whatever.

On 26 June it will be officially announced, and all the server and workstation manufacturers will have Woodies for sale. Maybe even Apple.
 
Bad Name!

Surely Apple won't change the name to "Mac Pro" - it's rubbish. Steve Jobs said they changed the Powerbook name because they wanted to have all thier computers with Mac in the name, surely there is nothing wrong with Powermac?!
Quad core and possibly 8 core sounds good though!
 
Yes, there is something wrong with "Powermac".

It has the word "power" in it. There is no point to use the word "power" now since they aren't going to be using the PPC processors. I'm pretty sure at this point everyone knows they are going to call it a Mac Pro. I really don't see what is so bad about it, but whatever.
 
Paranoidmarvin said:
Surely Apple won't change the name to "Mac Pro" - it's rubbish. Steve Jobs said they changed the Powerbook name because they wanted to have all thier computers with Mac in the name, surely there is nothing wrong with Powermac?!
Quad core and possibly 8 core sounds good though!

You seem to be forgetting that he also said, in reference to the name change, that "We're kinda done with 'Power'". So: it won't have Power in the name, it will have Mac, "Pro" would be in keeping with the way the laptop line's names changed, and Apple has in fact now trademarked Mac Pro in at least two countries. C'mon. What else do you need.
 
Paranoidmarvin said:
Surely Apple won't change the name to "Mac Pro" - it's rubbish. Steve Jobs said they changed the Powerbook name because they wanted to have all thier computers with Mac in the name, surely there is nothing wrong with Powermac?!
Quad core and possibly 8 core sounds good though!

Ho-hum...who cares? What's the name got to do with anything important? Do you use your computer as a status symbol? If it really bothers you, then refer to your computer as a "Macintosh Professional." That will give it a pompous sounding name that might make you happy.
 
THX1139 said:
Ho-hum...who cares? What's the name got to do with anything important? Do you use your computer as a status symbol? If it really bothers you, then refer to your computer as a "Macintosh Professional." That will give it a pompous sounding name that might make you happy.

hahahahahahaha.

Anyway, here are the top-of-the-line Mac Pro's specs:

Two dual-core 3.0Ghz Intel Core 2 Duo processors
1333Mhz frontisde bus per processor
4MB L2 cache per core
1GB of 533MHz DDR2 SDRAM (Expandable to 32GB)
500GB Serial ATA Hard drive (Expandable to 4x750GB hard drives)
16x SuperDrive (double-layer) (Expandable to 2 16x superdrives)
Four open PCI-Express expansion slots. (2 16x, 2 8x)
ATI Radeon FireGL V7300 (BTO option FireGL V7350)
 
macgeek2005 said:
Anyway, here are the top-of-the-line Mac Pro's specs:

Two dual-core 3.0Ghz Intel Core 2 Duo processors
1333Mhz frontisde bus per processor
4MB L2 cache per core
Impossible - Core 2 Duo can't be run dual socket (I assume that's what you mean by "2 processors").


macgeek2005 said:
1GB of 533MHz DDR2 SDRAM (Expandable to 32GB)
Possible for Conroe (single socket), but impossible for woodcrest dual-socket. Woodies don't support DDR2, period.
 
AidenShaw said:
Impossible - Core 2 Duo can't be run dual socket (I assume that's what you mean by "2 processors"). "Core 2 Duo" is Conroe, Woodies are "Xeon 51xx" chips.



Impossible for Conroe (single socket) - can't connect that many DIMMs. Impossible for woodcrest dual-socket. Woodies don't support DDR2, period.

My mistake. Whatever is the equivilent of what I said, is what they'll have.
 
macgeek2005 said:
My mistake. Whatever is the equivilent of what I said, is what they'll have.
Then you're talking about dual-socket Xeon 51xx chips with up to 64 GiB of FB-DIMM memory.

I haven't seen any 5000x chipset with that many PCIe lanes yet - I think you asked for 48 or 64 lanes total.

PCIe x8 is overkill for most everything (it's "xN", not "Nx"). Only multi-port SDR Infiniband or DDR InfiniBand, or multiport 10 Gbps Ethernet or 4 Gbps FC can use more than x4....

But, if someone shows me a server with eight x8 PCIe slots (64 lanes total) I'll cut a purchase order for 32 of them the same day.
 
AidenShaw said:
Then you're talking about dual-socket Xeon 51xx chips with up to 64 GiB of FB-DIMM memory.

I haven't seen any 5000x chipset with that many PCIe lanes yet - I think you asked for 48 or 64 lanes total.

PCIe x8 is overkill for most everything (it's "xN", not "Nx"). Only multi-port SDR Infiniband or DDR InfiniBand, or multiport 10 Gbps Ethernet or 4 Gbps FC can use more than x4....

But, if someone shows me a server with eight x8 PCIe slots (64 lanes total) I'll cut a purchase order for 32 of them the same day.

48 or 64 lanes? Um... no, 4 expansion slots. 2 of them will be 16x and 2 of them will be 8x.
 
macgeek2005 said:
48 or 64 lanes? Um... no, 4 expansion slots. 2 of them will be 16x and 2 of them will be 8x.
Wake up! 2 x16 = 32 lanes and 2 x8 = 16 lanes, therefore 48 lanes total. Each PCI express link uses serial connections or "lanes" and gangs those lanes up in groups of 1, 2, 4, 8, 12, 16 or 32 to make slots run at higher speeds.
 
weldon said:
Wake up! 2 x16 = 32 lanes and 2 x8 = 16 lanes, therefore 48 lanes total. Each PCI express link uses serial connections or "lanes" and gangs those lanes up in groups of 1, 2, 4, 8, 12, 16 or 32 to make slots run at higher speeds.

Oh, I was confusing lanes with slots, sorry.
 
Not to get in the way of your all might slots and lanes talk, but what about ram?

How much ram we talking about? Will the Mac Pro's still take 16gbs? Or do you all think less or more?
 
macgeek2005 said:
Why not? Those are great professional graphics cards. 512mb and 1GB.


I didn't say why not. I said what in the world? As in oh man... I'm in to deep reading this thread becuase all I see is the matrix screen when you all start talking about crazy things like the Ati what ever.... I knew it was a graphics card but usually it is not labeled like that so I was very confused to what it is exactly.

So what is it exactly? just a new name for a Vcard with 1GB? or is it something more special? don't get me wrong thats still awesome...
 
poppe said:
I didn't say why not. I said what in the world? As in oh man... I'm in to deep reading this thread becuase all I see is the matrix screen when you all start talking about crazy things like the Ati what ever.... I knew it was a graphics card but usually it is not labeled like that so I was very confused to what it is exactly.

So what is it exactly? just a new name for a Vcard with 1GB? or is it something more special? don't get me wrong thats still awesome...

Okay, now you're just sounding stupid. You obviously don't know anything about video cards.

http://www.ati.com/products/fireglv7350/index.html
 
it5five said:
Yes, there is something wrong with "Powermac".

It has the word "power" in it. There is no point to use the word "power" now since they aren't going to be using the PPC processors. I'm pretty sure at this point everyone knows they are going to call it a Mac Pro. I really don't see what is so bad about it, but whatever.

I understand the PowerPC asociation, but Mac Pro is such a rubbish name! They could still use Power to imply a Powerful computer. Just say the two names Mac Pro and Powermac - what sounds better?
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.