Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
THINNER

For ****s sakes Apple. The current MacBook Pro is thin enough. Like seriously what the actual ****. How many compromises is this "Pro" laptop going to have in order to shave off a few mm?

I'm glad I jumped ship on Apple when I did. I would hate to be further stuck in this ridiculous ecosystem.

Actually, I think laptops could be a lot thinner and lighter. I miss my MacBook Air (I now have a "Pro").
 
I often consider a PC, but whenever I stand in the shop trying them out, PCs feel a lot more plasticy and cheap. The design is more 'in your face' than Apple's understated class.

And even the highest res screen still looks a bit rubbish - Windows graphics seem blocky and look cheap.

And PCs can be just as expensive.

My lenovo laptop has an aluminum body thats just as solid as any MacBook, and at 1500$ out performs a 3000$ MacBook Pro.

Theres literally no excuse left to buy a Mac over a PC anymore.
 
My lenovo laptop has an aluminum body thats just as solid as any MacBook, and at 1500$ out performs a 3000$ MacBook Pro.

Theres literally no excuse left to buy a Mac over a PC anymore.
What model is that? I was Android for six years and the whole time wanted to move to PC but nothing tempted me.

Is it the 13 Windows or the E560 (which I assume also runs Windows) or the P40 Yoga or the X1 Carbon or the X1 Yoga or the P50 or P70 or Yoga 260 or Yoga 11e....? Colour me confused.
 
  • Like
Reactions: dotnet and brendu
Completely beside the point. Idgaf what Intel has been doing. There are around a thousand people on the Mac hardware teams. What the **** have they been doing this whole time?

In the last year or so?

R&D?
The 2015 rMBP with super fast nVME?
The 2015 MB?
The 2016 MB? (Where suitable chips, you know, actually existed)
[doublepost=1476225686][/doublepost]
My lenovo laptop has an aluminum body thats just as solid as any MacBook, and at 1500$ out performs a 3000$ MacBook Pro

As benchmarked by...?
 
  • Like
Reactions: dotnet and brendu
Actually, I think laptops could be a lot thinner and lighter. I miss my MacBook Air (I now have a "Pro").

And there are thin and light laptops on both the Mac and PC side, but they're far from the performance workhorses that Pro laptops are. Even a ultrabook/MacBook Air with an i7 gets a severely handicapped i7 compared to a standard laptop.

As a "Pro" laptop, the MacBook Pro is impressively thin, but going any thinner is going to be a compromise somewhere, be it poor thermals, poor battery life, or poor performance. We just simply aren't at a point where you can take a quad-core i7, a load of RAM, and a dedicated GPU and cram it into an ultrabook.
 
I really made the best decision purchasing my Early 2015 MBP 13 inch last year November. Of course, if I was in a bind right now, I would be waiting indefinitely. I love mine and have no plans to upgrade for a very, very, very long time.
 
Maybe if MR didn't have "Don't buy" stickers beneath each of them, they'd sell more ;-)

That said, I bought a MB12 for work last month and I admit I did so because it was the only one recently updated. I would not have bought a Gen-1 MB12.
Though, on all other platforms, the increases in CPU and GPU power are less significant when comparing SkyLake/KabyLake and Haswell/Broadwell. So while it's two years old, the latest CPUs aren't much faster.
It's really more of a psychological problem.

Are you happy with it? Planning buying one
 
I agree with a lot of this. A lot of people pandering for an update don't appreciate that the newer Intel CPUs aren't much more powerful, if more powerful at all. Similar or lower benchmarks for the sake of a refresh would be pointless.

What could be improved is the pricing. If Apple can't justify an update, then don't charge the same cash for older tech. The current rMBPs are still very capable machines. But continuing to price them in that market is insulting to the consumer.

If Apple was to drop the price it would create an expectation going forward.

They are still estimated to have sold 5 million in the last quarter - most of these people won't know or won't care that they are buying a machine with superseded components.

A price jump when the new models are released would probably outweigh the benefit of the update for a lot of people.
 
  • Like
Reactions: brentonbrenton
My lenovo laptop has an aluminum body thats just as solid as any MacBook, and at 1500$ out performs a 3000$ MacBook Pro.

Theres literally no excuse left to buy a Mac over a PC anymore.

Yeah, unfortunately if I had to buy another laptop today - it wouldn't be a mac. This is coming from a mac user for over 10 years. Not updating your computers for 3 years means that there is added risk in investing further in the ecosystem due to uncertainty if updates are planned for the future.

Releasing a new MBP now wouldn't be enough for me. Unless if Apple makes assurances for continued releases in line with Intel's release schedule, I would probably go Dell XPS or MS Surface.
 
  • Like
Reactions: pier
Heh, good luck with that. I've said it before but i'm convinced the iMac will be the only desktop Mac going forward. Look how out of date the other two are. I think i'm right in thinking the Mini still ships with Haswell. Why didn't it get a bump to Broadwell?

As for the Mac Pro anybody relying on a machine like that is crazy, Apple just can't be trusted to keep the components up to date. I watched Macbreak Weekly earlier and Rene Ritchie (and you hardly ever hear him utter a bad word about Apple) was saying they made that computer an appliance with no upgradeable parts they needed to be updated at least the GPUs on a regular basis, but they havent bothered.

Its a chicken and egg situation with those two machines to an extent. I wonder how many of the five million Macs were Mac Pros or Mac Minis? Not many I would think.
It's unfortunate for me that I gotta stick with fcpx for editing....till I can find a replacement it really sucks to be honest. I wish I didn't know fcp series in the first place.
[doublepost=1476226383][/doublepost]
I've been waiting to buy a new Mini because the old one I gave my mom needs to be replaced.
My current Mini (2011) is still OK but I would buy a new one and give my current Mini to her but Apple just refuses to take my money
I hear you.
 
  • Like
Reactions: stevekr
My lenovo laptop has an aluminum body thats just as solid as any MacBook, and at 1500$ out performs a 3000$ MacBook Pro.

Are you planning on sharing benchmarks for this laptop, or at least saying what model it is?

Edit: beaten like a red-headed step-child :oops:
 
Are you planning on sharing benchmarks for this laptop, or at least saying what model it is?

My Lenovo y700:
2.6Ghz Quad Core i7
16GB DDR4-2400 (user upgradable)
256GB PCI-E SSD + 1TB 7200 RPM HDD (both user upgradeable)
GeForce 960M 4GB dedicated GPU
15" 1080P IPS display

Cost: 1500$ before tax

MacBook Pro:
2.5Ghz Core i7 Quad core
16GB DDR3-1600 (non replacable)
512GB PCI-E SSD (non replaceable)
Radeon R9 370X (The 960M has 76% average performance over the R9 370X)
15" 2880X1800 IPS display

Cost: 3,049$ before tax

So basically all the MacBook Pro has over my Lenovo is the retina display, which is certainly not a 1500$ upgrade (the Lenovo Y700 also has a 4K screen option for about 150$ than the model I got). The MacBook has a bigger SSD but thats offset by the fact that I have an SSD and a massive 1TB HDD, and I can easily upgrade my SSD with off the shelf parts.

There you go. My Lenovo is better in every way measurable for half the cost.
 
I've been a loyal Apple computer owner since the early 1990s but I am hating it after the last few updates. I absolutely dread them. Updates in recent years have been retrogrades that dummy down its functionality. The iPhone is one hot mess. For the first time ever, I am considering a PC for my next computer and am looking forward to returning to Android's phones. I thought I'd never think such blasphemy, much less share it publicly, but Apple does what Apple does and they're losing me.
 
  • Like
Reactions: pier and jasnw
My lenovo laptop has an aluminum body thats just as solid as any MacBook, and at 1500$ out performs a 3000$ MacBook Pro.

Theres literally no excuse left to buy a Mac over a PC anymore.


But but no mac os.....say it before a zealot does lol.

Windows has gotten better so that line wears thinner more and more. So have Linux distro's and front end options for them. And if used for intense work, well you don't even see the OS screens. You see the application's. I have had clients say I hate the company fed desktop background, how can I fix that? I say its fed via GPO so can't be "fixed". Want to also say if you open word, excel or outlook full screen and do work...you don't see the desktop but tact has me not do that lol.

Which given the very small number of mac os only applications in the mainstream that means they are ports and look the same on anything anyway.

FCP and logic pro notable exceptions here ofc. Which aren't rays of hope. If memory serves FCP devs have been shifted to projects more on the no pro side. If memory serves some social media/video project for iOS. Updates not shaking the world here in past year or 2, this probably won't help wow us with the now once a year patching it seems to get I'd wager.

I'd say where your files save to is different but I run a NAS. I open up shares on that. Once mapped and such...they open up and look and feel the same OS independent. Only thing that changes...no more apple based protocol setup for one share in use.
 
My lenovo laptop has an aluminum body thats just as solid as any MacBook, and at 1500$ out performs a 3000$ MacBook Pro.

Theres literally no excuse left to buy a Mac over a PC anymore.

PCs in general, perhaps. But I can think of a few reasons why I'd never buy a Lenovo:
There is a pattern of spyware, malware, and lying. And these are just the customer-hostile practices that we know about.

And we're not talking about obscure junk models intended for low-end customers. This affected entire lines of computers in their premium and business lines, and the popular Yoga line.
 
Last edited:
According to rumors, Apple is planning to introduce a revamped MacBook Pro as soon as next month, said to feature a redesigned, thinner body, a flatter keyboard, a wider pressure-sensitive trackpad, and most notably, an OLED display touch panel that replaces the physical function keys.

This next month that you are talking about is supposed to be this month right?
 
I'm not convinced all of the Mac lineup will get a refresh. I could see them condensing the MacBook/Air/Pro line-up, and discontinuing the Mac mini. Maybe the Pro too.
 
My Lenovo y700:
2.6Ghz Quad Core i7
16GB DDR4-2400 (user upgradable)
256GB PCI-E SSD + 1TB 7200 RPM HDD (both user upgradeable)
GeForce 960M 4GB dedicated GPU
15" 1080P IPS display

Cost: 1500$ before tax

MacBook Pro:
2.5Ghz Core i7 Quad core
16GB DDR3-1600 (non replacable)
512GB PCI-E SSD (non replaceable)
Radeon R9 370X (The 960M has 76% average performance over the R9 370X)
15" 2880X1800 IPS display

Cost: 3,049$ before tax

So basically all the MacBook Pro has over my Lenovo is the retina display, which is certainly not a 1500$ upgrade (the Lenovo Y700 also has a 4K screen option for about 150$ than the model I got). The MacBook has a bigger SSD but thats offset by the fact that I have an SSD and a massive 1TB HDD, and I can easily upgrade my SSD with off the shelf parts.

There you go. My Lenovo is better in every way measurable for half the cost.

The SSD in my y700 is SATA using M.2 NGFF connector, it is still a SATA SSD and not a true PCIe NVME SSD that has been used in MBP waay back as 2013. The MBP would be 2-4x faster in disk io.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Feenician
What can anyone do? Apple is now following the market and while I still have a Iphone 6 for work, my Samsung phones are better in most respects and the android system and evolved to a higher level. My wife, a long-time iphone user, now happily switched to a android phone as well.
2 of my 3 Macs need upgrades, but where are the new models? My son is starting to look hard at the Surface pro because there are basically no new macs and no sign of them coming. Speculation is just that and we heard they were coming for months. It's bad business for Apple and people are already spending their holiday money on other things. Either they're having a tough time getting the new stuff to market or they're just making bad decisions.
 
  • Like
Reactions: merkinmuffley
My Lenovo y700:
2.6Ghz Quad Core i7
16GB DDR4-2400 (user upgradable)
256GB PCI-E SSD + 1TB 7200 RPM HDD (both user upgradeable)
GeForce 960M 4GB dedicated GPU
15" 1080P IPS display

Cost: 1500$ before tax

MacBook Pro:
2.5Ghz Core i7 Quad core
16GB DDR3-1600 (non replacable)
512GB PCI-E SSD (non replaceable)
Radeon R9 370X (The 960M has 76% average performance over the R9 370X)
15" 2880X1800 IPS display

Cost: 3,049$ before tax

So basically all the MacBook Pro has over my Lenovo is the retina display, which is certainly not a 1500$ upgrade (the Lenovo Y700 also has a 4K screen option for about 150$ than the model I got). The MacBook has a bigger SSD but thats offset by the fact that I have an SSD and a massive 1TB HDD, and I can easily upgrade my SSD with off the shelf parts.

There you go. My Lenovo is better in every way measurable for half the cost.

Phone size 1080p display, 7lbs, dog crap SSD and you have to unironically use a machine that looks like darth vader went on pimp my ride (inb4 "it doesn't matter what it looks like hurr durr". I've got news for you). Added bonus, Windows 10. No thanks. "Better in every way measurable" - only if every way you're measuring is scales
 
  • Like
Reactions: mashkina
Mac releases are restricted by Intel updates.

That may be true for certain Intel processors for certain Macs.

But I'm pretty sure there have been suitable newer Xeon processors released in the last 3 years for the Mac Pro.

And wasn't the Xeon in the Mac Pro already a year old at its release? If so... then the Mac Pro you buy RIGHT NOW has a 4 year old processor in it.

In that case... Apple wasn't waiting for Intel in that situation.
 
That may be true for certain Intel processors for certain Macs.

But I'm pretty sure there have been suitable newer Xeon processors released in the last 3 years for the Mac Pro.

And wasn't the Xeon in the Mac Pro already a year old at its release? If so... then the Mac Pro you buy RIGHT NOW has a 4 year old processor in it.

In that case... Apple wasn't waiting for Intel in that situation.

The Mac Pro is a mystery. I think they might well have given up on the trash can
 
  • Like
Reactions: pier
My Lenovo y700:
2.6Ghz Quad Core i7
16GB DDR4-2400 (user upgradable)
256GB PCI-E SSD + 1TB 7200 RPM HDD (both user upgradeable)
GeForce 960M 4GB dedicated GPU
15" 1080P IPS display

Cost: 1500$ before tax

MacBook Pro:
2.5Ghz Core i7 Quad core
16GB DDR3-1600 (non replacable)
512GB PCI-E SSD (non replaceable)
Radeon R9 370X (The 960M has 76% average performance over the R9 370X)
15" 2880X1800 IPS display

Cost: 3,049$ before tax

So basically all the MacBook Pro has over my Lenovo is the retina display, which is certainly not a 1500$ upgrade (the Lenovo Y700 also has a 4K screen option for about 150$ than the model I got). The MacBook has a bigger SSD but thats offset by the fact that I have an SSD and a massive 1TB HDD, and I can easily upgrade my SSD with off the shelf parts.

There you go. My Lenovo is better in every way measurable for half the cost.


Are they both the same generation Core i7? Looks like we can see the raw clock speed, but what about power efficiency? SSD read/write speeds? Display color accuracy? Weight? Available ports?
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.