Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
This story seems to go back and forth. The latest video from this guy attempts to swap modules across different systems and performing the documented DFU procedure.

It didn't work.

Apparently replacing the SSD with a different sized one requires a Genius Bar software tool.
 
This story seems to go back and forth. The latest video from this guy attempts to swap modules across different systems and performing the documented DFU procedure.

It didn't work.

Apparently replacing the SSD with a different sized one requires a Genius Bar software tool.
For the moment it needs to be serialized.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Killroy
A TPM is typically not built-in to the CPU on x86 machines. It's typically an i2c bus peripheral.

The implementation of iTPM or PTT on certain CPU has been available as old as Intel 6th gen CPU. It boils down if the OEM has the UEFI settings to toggle it. I have a couple of Lenovo and Acer workstations here have i5-6600 and I installed Windows 11 without a dedicated TPM module. I flipped the TPM setting in the UEFI to PTT and the installer just install away and passed the Windows 11 PC Health Check.
 
  • Like
Reactions: bobcomer
I’m sure macrumors will admit to spreading anti-Apple FUD and promptly apologize for its false headline.

Apple Configurator can successfully set this up if they are both the same size. The SSDs can be replaced, just not upgraded. It won't work if you try to put a larger SSD into the machine than it was sold with.
 
The Apple support document seems to assume you are still using the original storage board that came with the original Mac purchase, thus does not talk about serialization in MCU etc?
(I am referring to what is laid out by another poster here, the MCU is not supposed to be publicly accessible anyway)

What's interesting is that Luke Miani could not get the 512GB module to pair with the Studio that he originally pulled from. Judging by how iFixit succeeded in exchanging two 512GB modules between two different Studio Max, it seems Miani again did not try all available options there.
 
Last edited:
The supply chain is bottlenecked, covid is raging, there are barely enough chips to build the computers themselves and of course everyone at MR is losing it that they can't run to Amazon and load up their base model Mac Studio with 8 TB of storage for $200 and a 5 min swap job.

obi-wan-kenobi-says-move-along-o.gif
 
Apple Configurator can successfully set this up if they are both the same size. The SSDs can be replaced, just not upgraded. It won't work if you try to put a larger SSD into the machine than it was sold with.
If this is true, That sucks, and Apple is being #@¥&#& for doing that to its customers. I want the right to upgrade my own stuff just as much as I want the right to repair it.

why was it OK for Apple to give that to us in 2012, but not in 2022? It’s just greed.
 
Last edited:
"Yes, we could make the storage upgradable, but we really think it'd be better if you spent more money."

"Well I don't mind spending a fair price for storage"

"Ooh, erm. Well, we could price storage fairly but we really think it'd be better if you spent more money."
 
So now that word slowly spreads it seems like Apple is getting bashed for pairing specific memory-chips to specific machines. Because of that I would like to inform everyone, that Lenovo (a very non-Apple company) recently decided to permanently pair CPUs to Lenovo motherboards. So if you happen to buy a Lenovo computer (with a very user-accessible AMD CPU or APU) you will not be able to use this CPU or APU in any non-Lenovo system ever, even though it is a standard AMD-chip and you bought it and it is really just yours. There is also no way to re-pair the CPU. just sayin...
 
So now that word slowly spreads it seems like Apple is getting bashed for pairing specific memory-chips to specific machines. Because of that I would like to inform everyone, that Lenovo (a very non-Apple company) recently decided to permanently pair CPUs to Lenovo motherboards. So if you happen to buy a Lenovo computer (with a very user-accessible AMD CPU or APU) you will not be able to use this CPU or APU in any non-Lenovo system ever, even though it is a standard AMD-chip and you bought it and it is really just yours. There is also no way to re-pair the CPU. just sayin...
So they all suck then.
 
One of the biggest reasons why macs from the 2009 to 2012 are still usable now and not in the landfill is because they were upgradable. Easily upgradable. That plus DOSdude1 patches and OCLP extended the usable life of tens of thousands of Macs all around the worLd.

so if companies, other companies aside from Apple, are doing similar things to restrict upgrades and repairs, they all suck in my opinion, and they are doing it to make us buy their products again more quickly than we might want to. Why was it okay for Apple to let us upgrade our stuff in 2012 but not in 2022? The answer: the boundless greed of the 2 trillion dollar mega company, that pushes us to buy new stuff faster than we might want to.
 
Last edited:
One of the biggest reasons why macs from the 2009 to 2012 are still usable now and not in the landfill is because they were upgradable. Easily upgradable. That plus DOSdude1 patches and OCLP extended the usable life of tens of thousands of Macs all around the worLd.

so if companies, other companies aside from Apple, are doing similar things to restrict upgrades and repairs, they all suck in my opinion, and they are doing it to make us buy their products again more quickly than we might want to. GREED.
might i add: ...so that other people can sell people like us fonds-based insurance products that will make us more money if we buy more stuff from those companies that keep trying to make us buy even more stuff that we actually don't need.

it's just the way things are and to change it you'd have to change our entire, worldwide society.

noone has to like or approve what they are doing. i remember the peak of the hackintosh movement when people really craved the macos experience but didn't want to shelf out the money for notoriously expensive apple hardware. nowadays it seems people are more interested in the hardware (m-chips in particular) so a hackintosh is not an option anymore. people still can decide not to buy one though, if they are not happy with the terms offered.

apple has always made it especially difficult to upgrade storage on its products. i'm typing this on a 2014 5k iMac that would require me to take off the display to get to the fusion drive and most current products have the nand-chips soldered in anyways, giving you the choice of buying what they offer, using external storage or not buying their products.

i wrote it some pages earlier - it might be that the user-upgradability of storage is going to be the differentiator between the mac pro and the mac studio and the modularity refers to repairability and environmental effects of that.

not trying to defend anyone here. i'm building my windows-pcs usually from scratch, sourcing components i deem suitable for the task on hand and i would love to at least have the possibility to upgrade components if it turns out that i need more. but apple (probably mostly for reasons listed above) is currently not offering that so anyone has decide for themselves if the product offered is worth the trade-off.
 
  • Like
Reactions: TimmuJapan
Why don’t people just get the machine repaired instead of throwing it into landfill?
I imagine it's mostly because of unreasonable costs, but also because manufacturers set limits on the age of the machines they will repair. You could go to a third party repair shop if your machine allows parts to be replaced, but I don't personally know of one that I could go to.

Things will get worse with parts being coded together. In a few years time, if your storage fails on your laptop and the machine won't accept a replacement, and apple decide it's obsolete - even if you were happy using it the day before - then nobody will be able to replace the storage, meaning the whole thing gets scrapped.

Companies are making the choice to make their machines difficult or impossible to repair while simultaneously paying lip service to being green by saying they use recycled materials etc. Repairing is greener than recycling in every situation AFAIK.
 
Why don’t people just get the machine repaired instead of throwing it into landfill?
Um, because in recent time, they are being designed in such a way that makes them not repairable. When everything is soldered together on the motherboard, when one part goes, the whole thing goes. Could you imagine having a car, where if one part broke, you couldn’t replace it and had to throw the whole car away because all the parts were welded together inside? That’s what they are doing with computers these days…..
 
Um, because in recent time, they are being designed in such a way that makes them not repairable. When everything is soldered together on the motherboard, when one part goes, the whole thing goes. Could you imagine having a car, where if one part broke, you couldn’t replace it and had to throw the whole car away because all the parts were welded together inside? That’s what they are doing with computers these days…..
Would Apple not fix that?
 
I imagine it's mostly because of unreasonable costs, but also because manufacturers set limits on the age of the machines they will repair. You could go to a third party repair shop if your machine allows parts to be replaced, but I don't personally know of one that I could go to.

Things will get worse with parts being coded together. In a few years time, if your storage fails on your laptop and the machine won't accept a replacement, and apple decide it's obsolete - even if you were happy using it the day before - then nobody will be able to replace the storage, meaning the whole thing gets scrapped.

Companies are making the choice to make their machines difficult or impossible to repair while simultaneously paying lip service to being green by saying they use recycled materials etc. Repairing is greener than recycling in every situation AFAIK.
How long, on average, does Apple obsolete a product and no longer provide repair services?
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.